2 Chronicles 28:20 on God's control?
How does 2 Chronicles 28:20 reflect on God's sovereignty over Israel's enemies?

Canon Text

“So Tiglath-pileser king of Assyria came against him and afflicted him instead of strengthening him.” (2 Chronicles 28:20)


Historical Setting: Ahaz, Judah, and the Neo-Assyrian Empire

King Ahaz of Judah (c. 735–715 BC) abandoned Yahweh’s covenant, set up pagan altars (vv. 2–4, 22–25), and even sacrificed his own son. National security collapsed. Syria (Aram) and Israel invaded (vv. 5–6), Edom and Philistia raided (v. 18), and economic pressure mounted. Ahaz sent silver and gold from the temple, palace, and his officials (v. 21) to Tiglath-pileser III (Assyria, 745–727 BC), hoping for rescue. Instead the emperor “afflicted” Judah—exacting tribute, annexing territories, and leaving Jerusalem poorer and weaker. The Chronicler frames this political humiliation as the direct hand of God.


Literary Context in Chronicles

Chronicles consistently links covenant faithfulness with protection and covenant infidelity with exposure to enemy domination (e.g., 2 Chronicles 12:1–8; 24:20–24; 26:16–21). Ahaz’s narrative is the negative counterpart to godly kings like Jehoshaphat (ch. 20) and Hezekiah (chs. 29–32). 2 Chronicles 28:20 is the pivot: the foreign “savior” becomes God’s scourge.


Theological Principle: Divine Sovereignty over Nations

1. Instruments of Judgment. Yahweh raises and lowers kingdoms (Daniel 2:21). He “summons a bird of prey from the east” (Isaiah 46:11), “takes the shepherd’s staff in His hand” (Zechariah 11:7), and “brings a nation from afar” as a rod of discipline (Deuteronomy 28:49). Assyria calls itself a conqueror, yet Isaiah labels it “the rod of My anger” (Isaiah 10:5).

2. Covenant Coherence. Deuteronomy 28:25—“The LORD will cause you to be defeated before your enemies”—materializes in Ahaz’s reign. The text reaffirms that covenant curses operate through ordinary geopolitical forces under extraordinary divine direction.

3. Absolute Freedom. “The king’s heart is a watercourse in the hand of the LORD; He directs it wherever He pleases” (Proverbs 21:1). Tiglath-pileser thought he was expanding empire; Yahweh wielded him for judicial purposes.


Cross-References Underscoring Sovereignty

2 Kings 16:7–9 – Assyrian alliance narrative parallels Chronicles.

Isaiah 7–8 – Immanuel prophecy given while Ahaz negotiates with Assyria.

Psalm 2 – Nations rage, yet Yahweh installs His King.

Acts 4:25–28 – Human rulers fulfill God’s predestined plan, a principle extending from Ahaz’s day to the crucifixion.


Archaeological and Extra-Biblical Corroboration

• Annals of Tiglath-pileser III (Iran Stele, lines 13–15) list “Jehoahaz of Judah” (the Assyrian form of Ahaz) paying heavy tribute of “…silver, gold, and precious stones.”

• Nimrud reliefs depict tribute bearers from the Levant during Tiglath-pileser’s campaigns, substantiating the Chronicler’s economic details.

• Bullae and seals unearthed in Jerusalem (e.g., the “Ahaz [son of] Yehotam, king of Judah” bulla) confirm the historicity of Ahaz and the administrative milieu implied in 2 Chronicles 28.


Philosophical and Behavioral Implications

People often misplace trust in political alliances, technology, or wealth. Ahaz’s psychological profile—fear, pragmatism, and idolatry—illustrates a perennial tendency to seek salvation horizontally rather than vertically. The narrative demonstrates that such strategies not only fail but become the very avenue through which God exerts corrective sovereignty.


Christological Trajectory

Assyria’s domination highlights Judah’s desperate need for a righteous king—fulfilled ultimately in Jesus, the Davidic heir (Isaiah 9:6–7). Whereas Ahaz bartered temple treasures, Christ embodies the temple and offers Himself (John 2:19–21; Hebrews 9:11–14). God’s sovereign use of enemies in judgment foreshadows the cross, where human hostility fulfills divine redemption (Acts 2:23).


Pastoral and Practical Lessons

• Reliance on anything other than God invites subjugation to that very thing.

• National or personal discipline is not capricious but covenantal, moving believers toward repentance (Hebrews 12:5–11).

• God’s sovereignty is never thwarted by human schemes; it co-opts them.


Conclusion

2 Chronicles 28:20 is more than a historical annotation; it is a theological assertion that God remains absolute monarch over Israel’s enemies. He wields even imperial superpowers as chisels to sculpt His covenant people, preserving the line that will culminate in the resurrected Christ, the ultimate display of His sovereign grace.

Why did the LORD allow King Ahaz to seek help from Assyria in 2 Chronicles 28:20?
Top of Page
Top of Page