Acts 18:7: Jews-Gentiles early church ties?
How does Acts 18:7 reflect the relationship between Jews and Gentiles in the early church?

Historical Context of Acts 18:7

Acts 18 opens in A.D. 50–52, when Paul arrives in Corinth during the proconsulship of Gallio. The Delphi inscription naming Gallio (IG IV², 1 898) synchronizes secular chronology with the Lucan account, confirming the historical setting and dating the events to within a single biennium. Corinth, rebuilt by Julius Caesar in 44 B.C., was a bustling Roman colony whose cosmopolitan population included a sizable Jewish community evidenced by multiple synagogue inscriptions recovered near the Lechaion Road basilica excavations (late 19th century).


Socio-Religious Landscape of Corinth

Jews secured legal protection for synagogue worship under Roman law (cf. Josephus, Ant. 14.10.17). Gentiles attracted to monotheism attended services but remained outside covenantal boundaries (Acts 13:43). In Corinth, synagogue and marketplace sat in contiguous urban sectors; Paul’s move next-door underscores geographic proximity yet growing ideological tension between Christ-believing Jews/Gentiles and non-believing Jews.


God-Fearers as a Bridge Community

God-fearers appear throughout Acts—Cornelius (10:2), Lydia (16:14)—functioning as liminal figures who eased Gospel transmission from synagogue to broader Gentile society. Their familiarity with Tanakh reduced cultural friction, fulfilling Isaiah 56:6–7’s expectation that “foreigners who join themselves to the LORD” would be welcomed.


Paul’s Missiological Strategy: ‘To the Jew First’

Paul consistently begins evangelism in a synagogue (Acts 13:5; 17:1–2). When hardened opposition arises, he repositions but remains accessible. Romans 1:16 frames the pattern: “first to the Jew, then to the Greek.” Acts 18:7 exemplifies the tactical shift: physical separation without abandoning Jews—Crispus the synagogue ruler converts the very next verse (v. 8).


Spatial Symbolism: A House Beside the Synagogue

The juxtaposition of Justus’s house and the synagogue encapsulates the emergent ecclesial reality: one wall apart, yet separated by confession of Jesus as Messiah. The house becomes an embryonic ecclesia (cf. 1 Corinthians 16:19) demonstrating that sacred space is no longer nation-bound but Christ-centered (John 4:21–24).


Theological Implications for Unity in Christ

Ephesians 2:14–16 teaches that Christ “has made both one … having abolished in His flesh the law of commandments in ordinances.” Paul’s relocation enacts this truth—Jewish and Gentile believers gather under one roof, prefiguring Galatians 3:28 equality while respecting individual cultural identities (1 Corinthians 7:18–20).


Corroborating New Testament Evidence

Acts 14:1—“a great number of both Jews and Greeks believed.”

Acts 19:9—Paul separates disciples into the lecture hall of Tyrannus, repeating the synagogue-plus-adjacent-Gentile model.

Romans 16 lists mixed Jewish-Gentile house-churches, mirroring the Justus scenario.


Early Extra-Biblical Witnesses

The Didache (c. A.D. 50–70) implies mixed congregations observing both “prophets” and “teachers,” likely Jew-Gentile composites. 1 Clement 40–44 (A.D. 96) references Corinthian church order, assuming ongoing integration initiated in Acts 18.


Archaeological and Epigraphic Corroborations

• Synagogue lintel with menorah, lulav, and shofar found at Corinth (late 19th c.) locates Jewish worship near Roman forum.

• Erastus inscription (CIL X 696) verifies a high-ranking Gentile convert mentioned in Romans 16:23, affirming social diversity in the Corinthian church.

• Oxyrhynchus papyri (e.g., P⁴⁵, mid-3rd c.) preserve Acts with negligible variants in 18:7, attesting textual stability.


Application for Early Church Identity Formation

Acts 18:7 portrays a fluid yet respectful recalibration of communal space, illustrating:

1. Evangelistic persistence amid rejection.

2. Preservation of Jewish heritage within a Christ-centered framework.

3. Establishment of inclusive worship without coercive assimilation.


Continuity and Modern Implications

The verse challenges contemporary assemblies to maintain gospel fidelity while positioning ministry “next door” to resistant cultures, offering hospitality and dialogue grounded in scriptural authority (1 Peter 3:15).


Conclusion

Acts 18:7 encapsulates the transitional chemistry of the nascent church: physical proximity, theological divergence, and ultimate unity in Messiah. By relocating to a God-fearing Gentile’s house adjoining the synagogue, Paul affirms Israel’s priority, extends salvation to the nations, and models the reconciliatory architecture of the body of Christ—“one flock, one Shepherd” (John 10:16).

What significance does Acts 18:7 have in the spread of early Christianity?
Top of Page
Top of Page