Does Romans 13:2 imply blind obedience to all laws? Text of Romans 13:2 “Consequently, the one who resists authority is opposing what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves.” Immediate Context (Romans 13:1–7) Paul’s argument flows from the call in 12:1–2 to present our bodies as living sacrifices and to avoid being “conformed to this world.” Chapter 13 applies that transformed life to the civil sphere. Government is portrayed as “God’s servant for your good” (13:4), its delegated task being to restrain evil and reward good. Obedience, in this context, is framed by two motives: to avoid wrath (13:4) and “for the sake of conscience” (13:5). Biblical Theology of Authority Scripture presents a hierarchy: God → Christ → human authorities → citizens (1 Corinthians 11:3; Colossians 1:16–17). Because authority is derived, it is never absolute (John 19:11). Therefore Romans 13 cannot override God’s moral law revealed in both Testaments. Limits Demonstrated in Scripture 1. Hebrew midwives disobeyed Pharaoh’s infanticide decree and were blessed (Exodus 1:17–21). 2. Rahab hid the spies; Hebrews 11:31 commends her faith. 3. Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego refused Nebuchadnezzar’s idolatry (Daniel 3). 4. Daniel defied the prayer ban (Daniel 6). 5. Peter and the apostles answered, “We must obey God rather than men” (Acts 5:29). These inspired narratives show that Romans 13:2 does not require blind compliance when human law contradicts divine command. Apostolic Practice Paul himself appealed to Roman law (Acts 25:11) yet broke laws forbidding certain preaching (Acts 17:6–7). John wrote Revelation from exile for non-compliance. Neither apostle viewed obedience as absolute; they honored authority insofar as it remained within God-ordained bounds. Purpose of Government Government is “not a terror to good conduct, but to bad” (Romans 13:3). When a regime reverses this purpose—punishing righteousness and rewarding evil—it forfeits moral legitimacy, though it may retain power temporarily (Isaiah 10:1–2; Habakkuk 1:13). Conscience and Witness Romans 13:5 roots obedience in conscience. Yet conscience itself is recalibrated by Scripture (Hebrews 5:14). When obedience would sear conscience—e.g., coerced participation in abortion or idolatry—believers must accept civil penalty while remaining faithful, thereby bearing witness (1 Peter 2:12, 19-20). Harmony with 1 Peter 2:13–17 Peter likewise commands submission “for the Lord’s sake,” yet in the same letter praises those who suffer for doing good (2:20) and implicitly sanctions civil disobedience when righteousness demands it (3:14-17). Both apostles agree: submission is the default; disobedience is exceptional, principled, and nonviolent. Historical Illustrations • Early Christians rescued abandoned infants, violating Roman exposure laws, a fact attested by the Epistle to Diognetus (5.6). • The Magdeburg Confession (1550) argued that lower magistrates must oppose higher ones who command ungodliness, influencing Reformed political thought and the American founders’ appeal to “the laws of nature and of nature’s God.” • Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s resistance to Nazism rested on Romans 13 rightly limited by Acts 5:29. • Civil-rights leader Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. cited Augustine: “An unjust law is no law at all,” aligning with biblical precedent. Practical Guidelines for Believers Today 1. Evaluate laws against explicit Scripture. 2. Exhaust lawful avenues of appeal (Acts 25:11). 3. Disobey only when obedience would be sin. 4. Accept consequences without violence (Matthew 5:39-45). 5. Continue to pray for rulers (1 Timothy 2:1-2) and seek their good (Jeremiah 29:7). Conclusion Romans 13:2 warns against a rebellious spirit that seeks autonomy from God-appointed order. It does not mandate blind obedience. When civil authority commands what God forbids or forbids what God commands, the believer, with reverence and readiness to suffer, must obey the higher throne. |
    |