What historical evidence supports the events described in Joshua 6? Canonical Context Joshua 6:27 records, “So the LORD was with Joshua, and his fame spread throughout the land.” Verses 1-26 narrate the supernatural fall of Jericho, immediately preceding Israel’s entry into Canaan in 1406 BC (cf. 1 Kings 6:1 + Judges 11:26 → Ussher 4004 BC chronology). Because Scripture presents the account as literal history (Hebrews 11:30; James 2:25), the question of corroborating evidence involves textual, geographical, archaeological, and cultural data. Site Identification: Tell es-Sultan Jericho’s mound lies 825 ft (250 m) below modern sea level near the spring ‘Ain es-Sultan. The continuous Arabic place-name, the Hellenistic form Ἱεριχώ, and Early Bronze fortifications preserved on-site provide an unbroken line of occupation matching the biblical Jericho. Major Excavations and Primary Finds 1. John Garstang (1930-1936) • Uncovered a massive double city wall and a destruction layer he dated c. 1400 BC by Cypriot bichrome ware. • Reported fallen red mud-brick debris “forming a ramp” at the base of the retaining wall—consistent with people “going up into the city, every man straight ahead” (Joshua 6:20). 2. Kathleen Kenyon (1952-1958) • Attributed the wall’s fall to an earlier Middle Bronze destruction (c. 1550 BC) because she saw no Late Bronze imported wares. • Nevertheless confirmed a violent conflagration, collapsed brick superstructure, and jars of stored grain burned in place—all elements matching Joshua 6. 3. Bryant G. Wood (1980s-1990s reassessment) • Re-examined Kenyon’s ceramic corpus; identified Late Bronze I shoulder-led lamps, Cypriot and local pottery placing destruction c. 1400 BC. • Noted scarabs from adjacent tombs bearing the names of pharaohs Hatshepsut and Thutmose III, terminating with Amenhotep III (c. 1386-1349 BC), indicating occupation until the late 15th century. Architectural Correlations • Retaining Wall (revetment) 12-15 ft high with an upper mud-brick wall 6 ft thick: exactly the kind of fortification a marching army could not breach. • Outer bricks fell outward, rare in siege warfare yet required to form a makeshift ramp—precisely what Garstang and Kenyon observed. • Northern quarter wall segment left standing; this matches the survival of Rahab’s house located “in the wall” (Joshua 2:15). Kenyon’s Field III unearthed an intact stretch of wall with domestic structures still attached. Burn Layer and Grain Caches • Three-foot ash layer covering floors; temperatures hot enough to vitrify mud-brick → indicates deliberate burning, not gradual decay. • Carbonized grain jars found in abundance; besiegers normally sequester food, but Israel was commanded “Do not take any of the devoted things” (6:18) and destroyed Jericho at harvest time (3:15). Grain still in situ corroborates a short siege followed by immediate conflagration. Chronological Synchrony with Biblical Timeline • Biblical date ≅ 1406 BC; pottery, scarabs, and radiocarbon dates (after 2010 high-precision wiggle-matching) cluster 1550-1400 BC. Calibration curve plateaus make 1400 BC statistically viable within 1σ of 14C results (~1590-1410 BC). • Destruction is followed by 600+ yrs without city walls until the time of Hiel (1 Kings 16:34), exactly as Scripture portrays Jericho lying mostly unfortified. Extra-Biblical Textual Witnesses • Late Bronze Amarna Letters EA 273-290 (c. 1350 BC) lament the loss of Canaanite strongholds to the ‘Apiru. The geopolitical vacuum fits a Jericho already fallen and Canaanite kings seeking aid. • 19th-18th cent. BC Egyptian Execration Texts list “Ruha – Jericho,” anchoring Jericho as a fortified entity compatible with the biblical framework of city-states. Miraculous Mechanics versus Natural Mechanisms While Scripture attributes the collapse to Yahweh, plausible secondary mechanisms exist: • An earthquake along the Jordan Rift (part of the Dead Sea Transform fault). Sediment trenches show seismites dating ~1400 ± 50 BC (Kanari et al., Geological Survey of Israel). A fault-triggered soil-liquefaction could account for an outward brick sprawl while preserving Rahab’s section. Miraculous timing and instructions (seven-day march, trumpet blast) remain theologically central. Responses to Common Objections 1. “Kenyon disproved Joshua.” – Kenyon’s own data, when properly dated, align with Scripture; her earlier ceramic chronology has been universally revised. 2. “Jericho was uninhabited in 1400 BC.” – Kenyon’s trench was narrow; broader Garstang and Italian-Palestinian digs (1997-2017) prove continuous Late Bronze occupation within the tell’s north-western sector. 3. “No outside chronicles record the collapse.” – Small Canaanite city-states seldom feature in Egyptian annals; lack of mention is an argument from silence, not evidence. Theological Implications The historical data do not merely validate one chapter; they reinforce the trustworthiness of the entire biblical narrative, demonstrating a God who acts in space-time. The same Lord who brought down Jericho’s walls has raised Jesus bodily from the tomb (1 Corinthians 15:3-8), offering salvation to all who believe (Romans 10:9). Summary • Tell es-Sultan is unanimously identified as ancient Jericho. • Archaeology reveals a sudden destruction, fallen outward walls, heavy fire, intact grain jars, and an occupational gap—converging precisely with Joshua 6. • Ceramic, scarab, and radiocarbon evidence fits a 15th-century BC date, in harmony with the biblical timeline. • Extra-biblical texts and seismic studies provide additional corroboration. Therefore, the cumulative, multidisciplinary evidence strongly supports the historicity of the events described in Joshua 6 and verifies Joshua 6:27’s understated conclusion: “So the LORD was with Joshua.” |
    |