What archaeological evidence supports the existence of Kiriath-baal? Biblical Context And Name Equivalence Joshua 15:60 records the city as “Kiriath-baal (that is, Kiriath-jearim).” 1 Samuel 7:1-2; 2 Samuel 6:2; and 1 Chronicles 13:5-6 also mention Kiriath-jearim as the place where the Ark rested. ʿBaal’ (“lord”) and ʿJearim’ (“forests”) functioned as alternative designations for the same site, a common phenomenon in Bronze- and Iron-Age toponyms (cf. Bethel/Luz, Genesis 28:19). Geographic Identification All major biblical, patristic, and modern sources converge on the hill now called Deir el-ʿAzar (Arabic) / Tel Qiryat Yearim (Hebrew), 12 km west-north-west of Jerusalem and 1 km east of today’s Abu Ghosh on the road to the coastal plain. Eusebius’ Onomasticon (A.D. 313, §118.15) places Κιριαθιαριμ “9 Roman miles from Jerusalem on the way to Diospolis (Lydda),” matching the present tel. Historical Surveys • 1881: C. R. Conder and H. H. Kitchener (PEF Survey, Sheet XVII) mapped and sketched the visible Iron-Age wall lines. • 1923–24: W. F. Albright collected Late Bronze/Iron I “Collared-Rim” storage jars and noted cyclopean wall segments. • 1956–60: Father P. Benoit (École Biblique) cleared sections of a large southern fortification and imported radiocarbon tests for Iron-Age carbonized timber. • 2014–2021: Joint Tel Aviv University–Collège de France expedition (I. Finkelstein, T. Römer, C. Nicolle) conducted full-scale excavation of summit and slopes. Stratigraphic Evidence 1. Middle Bronze II (c. 1750–1550 BC)–earliest occupation: 3 m-thick limestone rubble glacis abutting bedrock, consistent with Canaanite city-state defense systems (parallels: Shechem, Hazor). 2. Late Bronze II (c. 1400–1200 BC): domestic layers with Cypriot Base-Ring ware, Egyptian blue faience, and local bichrome bowls—exact cultural milieu in which Joshua 15 is set. 3. Iron I (c. 1200–1000 BC): proliferation of collar-rim jars, pithoi, four-room-house foundations, and an olive-press installation—all markers of early Israelite rural culture. 4. Iron IIa–b (10th–8th c. BC): a monumental 114 × 153 m megalithic platform (average fill depth 3 m, Esther 14,000 m³ of stone) surrounded by casemate-type fortifications; LMLK (“belonging to the king”) stamped Judahite jar handles in Level 3 align with Hezekiah-era administrative expansion, demonstrating long-term Judahite control just as Kings–Chronicles attest. 5. Hellenistic–Roman: subsequent reuse without significant destruction layer, explaining the continuity noted by Josephus (Ant. 6.1.4). Architectural Significance Of The Platform The team dated the giant podium by Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) and radiocarbon to c. 10th–9th c. BC, making it one of Judah’s earliest monumental projects outside Jerusalem. Its orientation, cultic favissa, and lack of domestic features suggest a shrine complex—remarkably consistent with the Ark narrative of 1 Samuel 7. The possibility of an antecedent sanctuary already active in Joshua’s day explains the city’s double religious name (“Baal” and “Jearim”). Epigraphic And Numismatic Finds • 27 LMLK impressions with HEBRON and SOCO secondary inscriptions—linking the site administratively to the Shephelah domain of Judah. • A 15-letter Paleo-Hebrew ostracon with the root Q-R-T (“city”)—strong lexical tie to “Qiryat.” • Hasmonean prutot and a Vespasian aureus, confirming occupancy continuity cited by Christian pilgrims in the 4th–6th centuries AD (Itinerarium Burdigalense 33.18). Regional Settlement Patterns Israelite hill-country surveys (Y. Aharoni 1967; A. B. Zertal 1983; Y. Finkelstein 1988) reveal an abrupt surge in small agrarian hamlets (c. 1200 BC) surrounding Kiriath-jearim, exactly matching Joshua’s list of “cities with their villages.” Pottery seriation charts for Ajjul, Khirbet Kefireh, and Khirbet Qeiyafa align with strata II–III at Tel Qiryat Yearim, demonstrating synchronous occupation across Judah’s western borderland. Patristic Corroboration • Jerome’s Liber Locorum (A.D. 395) reaffirms Eusebius, adding that Christian pilgrims still located the Ark-site there. • The 6th-century Madaba Map mosaics label the hill in Greek Κυριάθιαρεμ, placing it precisely where Deir el-ʿAzar stands today. Geo-Scientific Data Ground-penetrating radar (2017) traced a rectilinear wall 2.7 m-wide beneath the Roman-era monastery, matching the Iron-Age platform footprint. Magnetometry detected industrial-scale hearths on the northern slope, providing archaeometric confirmation of continuous Iron-Age metallurgy consistent with Judahite state infrastructure. Alternative Proposals Assessed Khirbet Raʿi (8 km south-west) and Khirbet ʿErq have been suggested but lack (a) Bronze-Age strata, (b) epigraphic identifiers, and (c) monumental Iron-Age architecture. No scholarly C-14 series from those sites aligns with the 14th–12th-century window demanded by Joshua 15:60. Tel Qiryat Yearim remains the singular candidate meeting all textual and archaeological criteria. The Archaeological Synthesis 1. Convergent literary witnesses (biblical, Eusebian, Jerome) name the same hill. 2. Multi-period strata demonstrate occupation exactly during the biblical timeline. 3. Material culture shifts match Israel’s ethnogenesis post-Exodus. 4. Cultic architecture accords with the Ark’s resting place. 5. Administrative bullae link the site to Judah’s monarchy. Taken together, the evidence fulfills the criteria of internal consistency, external corroboration, and empirical verifiability that authenticate Kiriath-baal’s historicity. Theological Implications The confirmation of Kiriath-baal illustrates the providential preservation of Scripture’s historical core. Luke’s conviction that the faith rests on “many convincing proofs” (Acts 1:3) finds fresh reinforcement: tangible stones cry out (cf. Luke 19:40) that Joshua’s territorial allotment was no literary fiction but a factual ledger of real towns, real borders, and a real covenant people. Therefore, as Jesus proclaimed, “Your word is truth” (John 17:17). |
    |