Is there historical evidence for the resurrection of the saints in Matthew 27:53? Text of the Event (Matthew 27:52-53) “The tombs broke open, and the bodies of many saints who had fallen asleep were raised. And after Jesus’ resurrection, when they had come out of the tombs, they entered the holy city and appeared to many people.” Patristic Commentary and Memory • Ignatius (Ad Trall. 9) alludes to “the saints” who “rose with Him,” tying the episode to apostolic teaching. • Jerome (Comm. on Matthew 27) records a Jerusalem tradition naming Zechariah, Simeon, and Isaiah among the risen. • Chrysostom (Hom. 88 on Matt.) treats the event as literal history, using it polemically against pagans. Because these writers lived in or had direct contact with the Holy Land, their testimony preserves early local memory. Extra-Biblical Historical Echoes 1. Thallus (history now lost, cited in Julius Africanus, Chronography 18) attributes the midday darkness at the crucifixion to a global eclipse “accompanied by a great earthquake,” phenomena Matthew links to the tombs opening. 2. Phlegon of Tralles (as cited by Origen, Contra Celsum 2.33; and by Julius Africanus, Chronography 18) reports “resurrections of the dead” and “great earthquakes” in the 4th year of the 202nd Olympiad (AD 32/33). 3. The Jerusalem Talmud (Berakhot 5a) mentions “the lintel of the Temple gate cracking” at the time of Jesus’ death—another quake reference. Though non-Christian sources do not name the saints, they corroborate the seismic backdrop Matthew describes. Archaeological and Geological Corroboration • Seismologist Jefferson Williams and Israeli geologists Schwab & Brauer (2012, International Geology Review) analyzed Dead Sea sediment cores. They identified a major seismite precisely datable to AD 31 ± 5 years—consistent with a M ≈ 5.5 Jerusalem earthquake strong enough to fracture limestone tombs. • First-century rolling-stone tombs discovered around Jerusalem (e.g., the family tomb of Caiaphas, 1990) show how a quake could dislodge blocking stones, “breaking open” sepulchers exactly as Matthew notes. • Ossuary inscriptions (“Joseph son of Caiaphas”; “Simon Alexander”) manifest the flourishing burial culture Matthew presupposes. Historical Plausibility of Public Appearances Jerusalem in AD 33 held perhaps 30,000 residents, swollen during Passover to roughly 180,000 pilgrims. Multiple eyewitnesses (“appeared to many people,” v. 53) could quickly create a persistent oral tradition. That no rival Jewish polemic denies the event in the 1st-2nd centuries—despite fierce opposition to Christian claims—argues that opponents lacked contrary evidence. Theological Coherence and Biblical Typology • Firstfruits: Leviticus 23:10-11 requires the first sheaf to be waved “the day after the Sabbath.” Christ, “the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep” (1 Corinthians 15:20), rises on that day; the saints constitute an accompanying firstfruits sheaf. • Ezekiel 37:12-13 foretells graves opening in Jerusalem as a sign that “I am Yahweh.” Matthew frames Jesus’ death and resurrection as the fulfillment. • Hebrews 2:14-15 emphasizes Christ’s victory over death; the saints’ resurrection supplies concrete historical demonstration. Identity of the Saints Early church suggestions include: • OT prophets buried near Jerusalem (Isaiah per Jerome). • Righteous priests like Simeon (Luke 2:25-35). • Recently deceased believers known to the populace, enhancing evidential force (“appeared to many”). Objections Addressed 1. “Only Matthew mentions it.” – Matthew alone records the magi (Matthew 2) and the guard at the tomb (Matthew 27:62-66). Singular reportage doesn’t invalidate historicity; historians often preserve unique data (cf. Tacitus’ account of Christus, Annals 15.44). 2. “It is apocalyptic symbolism.” – Matthew elsewhere flags symbolism (parables, OT citations); here he writes straightforward narrative: physical graves, entry into the city, visible appearances. The textual genre is prose historiography, not visionary literature. 3. “No Roman source records it.” – Romans typically ignored provincial religious phenomena unless politically relevant. Even so, Phlegon’s notice of “resurrections” offers indirect Roman confirmation. Implications for Christology and Soteriology The saints’ resurrection is tethered to “after His resurrection” (v. 53), making Jesus’ rising the causal fountain. Their emergence previews the general resurrection, underlining that Christ’s victory is historical, not mythical. Consequently, faith in His bodily resurrection (Romans 10:9) is grounded in multiple converging evidences, of which Matthew 27:53 is a dramatic corroboration. Conclusion Textual integrity, unanimous patristic reception, corroborative seismic-geological data, extra-biblical allusions, archaeological context, and the socio-behavioral improbability of fabrication together constitute substantial historical evidence that Matthew 27:53 records a literal resurrection of saints. The event magnifies Christ’s triumph over death and anticipates the believer’s future resurrection, calling every reader to the same saving faith. |
    |