How did the saints rise and appear to many in Matthew 27:53? Passage (Berean Standard Bible, Matthew 27:50-53) “After Jesus had cried out again in a loud voice, He yielded up His spirit. And behold, the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth quaked and the rocks were split. The tombs broke open, and the bodies of many saints who had fallen asleep were raised. After His resurrection, when they had come out of the tombs, they entered the holy city and appeared to many.” Immediate Literary Setting Matthew links four signs to the crucifixion: the torn veil, the earthquake, split rocks, and opened tombs. Together they signal divine judgment on sin and the inauguration of the new covenant. First-century Jerusalem sat atop the seismically active Dead Sea Transform; Josephus (War 4.4.5) and modern geologists identify quake-induced fissures in the region, so Matthew’s report fits known conditions. Identity of the “Saints” “Saints” (ἅγιοι) here refers to Old-Covenant righteous buried near Jerusalem—patriarchs, prophets, martyrs. Second-Temple burials clustered on the Mount of Olives and the Kidron slopes; thousands of ossuaries dated 100 BC–AD 70 have been excavated (cf. Avni, Israel Antiquities Authority). Matthew’s wording presumes local, not global, graves. Nature of Their Resurrection Scripture distinguishes three categories: 1. Temporary restorations (e.g., Jairus’s daughter). 2. Christ’s unique, glorified resurrection. 3. A first-fruit cohort sharing His victory (Matthew 27:52-53; Ephesians 4:8). Because they rose “after His resurrection” and “appeared” rather than merely revived, the early church (Ignatius, Trallians 9; Augustine, City of God 18.53) treated them as receiving glorified bodies and later ascending with Christ (Acts 1:9 echoes, “a cloud received Him”—collective imagery). Theological Significance • Certification of Jesus as “firstborn from the dead” (Revelation 1:5). • Demonstration that His cross conquered Sheol (Hebrews 2:14-15). • Preview of the general resurrection promised in Daniel 12:2 and 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17. Matthew alone records the event, but unique reportage is common (only Luke mentions the Emmaus walk; only John records Lazarus’s raising). Independent accounts increase credibility, meeting the “multiple attestation” criterion (Habermas & Licona, Case for the Resurrection p. 273). Historical Plausibility Early hostile sources concede empty tomb and post-mortem phenomena: • “The disciples stole Him” circulated by the Sanhedrin (Matthew 28:13-15), implying a missing body. • Tacitus (Annals 15.44) mentions “the pernicious superstition” of Christ’s resurrection. If Jerusalem citizens witnessed resurrected saints (Matthew 27:53) their testimony would accelerate explosive church growth recorded in Acts 2-6—over 5,000 converts within weeks in the very city of the crucifixion. Answering Modern Objections 1. Legend Theory: Legends require time; Matthew writes within living memory (< 40 yrs) when eyewitnesses could falsify him. 2. Why Only Matthew? Ancient historians commonly select material suiting their theme. Matthew emphasizes fulfilled prophecy; a mass resurrection fits Ezekiel 37’s vision of dry bones coming to life—the Spirit’s inauguration. 3. Naturalistic Impossibility: Creation ex nihilo (Genesis 1:1) already commits the reader to a God who suspends ordinary processes. Documented modern healings (e.g., peer-reviewed cancer regressions studied by the Christian Medical & Dental Associations, 2016) show divine intervention continues. Archaeological and Geological Corroborations • The “Gabriel Inscription” (1st c. BC) anticipates a messianic resurrection on the third day, revealing Jewish expectation. • Seismic analysis of Dead Sea sediments (Williams, 2011, Int’l Geology Rev.) notes a significant quake circa AD 31±5 that fits the Gospel timeline. • Ossuary inscription “Alexander son of Simon of Cyrene” (Cf. Mark 15:21) ties burial customs and Gospel persons to physical artifacts. Relation to Broader Redemptive History Christ is called “the firstfruits” (1 Colossians 15:23). In Leviticus 23:10-14 the first sheaf guaranteed the coming harvest. The saints of Matthew 27 are that token harvest—concrete evidence that all who trust Christ will likewise rise. Eventual Destiny of the Raised Saints Post-ascension silence suggests they accompanied Christ heavenward (Ephesians 4:8-10: “He led captives in His train”). Their temporary earthly re-appearance parallels Moses and Elijah’s brief return on the Mount of Transfiguration—moments of divine disclosure, not permanent residency. Practical Implications 1. Assurance: The graves of God’s people are temporary habitations. 2. Evangelism: Eyewitness testimony (“appeared to many”) modeled direct proclamation demanding a response. 3. Worship: The event underscores God’s holiness—earth shakes, veil rends, saints rise; human history pivots on Calvary. Conclusion Matthew 27:53 records a literal, bodily resurrection of certain Old-Covenant believers, timed immediately after Jesus’ own triumph over death, serving as tangible evidence that His atonement inaugurates the universal resurrection to come. The passage is textually secure, historically consistent, theologically coherent, and consonant with the power of God who “gives life to the dead and calls things that are not as though they were” (Romans 4:17). |
    |