Hebrews 13:10 & OT sacrifices link?
How does Hebrews 13:10 relate to the Old Testament sacrificial system?

Text of Hebrews 13:10

“We have an altar from which those who serve at the tabernacle have no right to eat.”


Immediate Context (Hebrews 13:7–16)

The exhortations of Hebrews 13 culminate in verses 10–16, where the writer urges believers to bear the reproach of Jesus “outside the camp” (v. 13) and to offer continual sacrifices of praise (v. 15) and shared possessions (v. 16). Verse 10 introduces the contrast between the Christian “altar” and the Levitical service still practiced by some first-century Jews.


Old Testament Background: Altars and Priestly Privileges

1. Sacrificial meals pervade Leviticus. In peace offerings, worshipers and priests ate selected portions (Leviticus 7:11-18).

2. In most sin offerings, priests alone ate the remaining flesh “in a holy place” (Leviticus 6:25-30).

3. Eating communicated covenant fellowship; exclusion signified distance from God (Exodus 29:33; Leviticus 10:17-18).

4. The altar itself was the meeting-point of atonement, cleansing, and communion (Exodus 29:36-37).


The Sin Offering on the Day of Atonement

Leviticus 16 distinguishes the most significant sin offering: the carcasses of the bull and goat were burned “outside the camp” (Leviticus 16:27). No one—priest or layman—ate from this sacrifice. Hebrews elsewhere applies this very offering to Jesus’ death (Hebrews 13:11-12; cf. 9:11-14). Thus, verse 10 implicitly recalls the unique, non-edible sin offering whose blood alone secured atonement.


Priestly Eating Rights vs. Restriction

Under the Mosaic economy, only ordained Aaronic priests possessed the right to eat the sacrifice (Numbers 18:8-11). Yet they were simultaneously barred from consuming the Day-of-Atonement victim. Hebrews seizes that paradox: Old-covenant priests cannot eat from the once-for-all offering of Christ, because their system has been eclipsed (Hebrews 7:18-19; 10:1-4).


Jesus’ Cross as the Fulfillment and Superior Altar

The Christian “altar” is not a physical structure but the totality of Christ’s self-offering (Hebrews 9:24-26) accomplished on the cross. By metonymy, the cross is called an altar because:

• Blood was shed there, fulfilling typological requirements (Leviticus 17:11; Hebrews 9:22).

• It stands at the intersection of heaven and earth, replacing the bronze and golden altars (Hebrews 8:5; 10:19-20).

Believers “eat” by faith—appropriating the benefits of atonement (John 6:51, 56; 1 Corinthians 10:16).


Exclusion of Levitical Servants: Inability to Partake

Those who “serve at the tabernacle” (present tense) refers to individuals persisting in the Levitical cult after Christ’s resurrection. Because they anchor their status in obsolete rituals, they have “no right” (ou exousian) to share in Christ’s sacrifice. Rights spring from covenant; the new covenant nullifies the old (Jeremiah 31:31-34; Hebrews 8:13).


Participation for Believers: Eucharistic and Spiritual Fellowship

Early Christians expressed their access to this altar in the Lord’s Supper: “Is not the bread we break a participation in the body of Christ?” (1 Corinthians 10:16). The Supper does not repeat Calvary; it proclaims it (1 Corinthians 11:26). Hebrews reinforces that all believers—not merely clergy—possess priestly status (Hebrews 10:19-22; 1 Peter 2:9) and thus may “eat.”


“Outside the Camp”: Continuity and Discontinuity

Verses 11-13 link Christ’s death “outside the gate” with the burned sin offering “outside the camp,” urging disciples to leave the security of Judaic institutions and bear stigma for Jesus. Continuity: the pattern of atonement outside the sacred precincts. Discontinuity: believers re-enter God’s presence freely while embracing societal rejection.


Implications for Christian Worship and Ethics

1. Worship centers on the finished work of Christ, not on ritual repetition.

2. Ethical response: “the fruit of lips that confess His name” (Hebrews 13:15) and tangible generosity (v. 16) replace animal offerings.

3. Separation from worldly approval is expected; the city to come (v. 14) eclipses earthly Jerusalem.


Canonical Harmony and Consistency

Hebrews aligns perfectly with OT prophecy that anticipated a singular, sufficient sacrifice (Psalm 40:6-8; Isaiah 53:10-12). The internal coherence of Scripture affirms that the Mosaic shadows were intended to give way to the Messiah’s substance (Colossians 2:16-17).


Archaeological and Manuscript Corroboration

• Portions of Hebrews appear in Papyrus 46 (circa AD 175), demonstrating an early, stable text.

• The Levitical priestly quarters unearthed near the Temple Mount illustrate the historical reality of tabernacle-to-temple service, the very system Hebrews addresses.

• A large first-century refuse area outside Jerusalem’s northern wall provides geographical confirmation of execution sites “outside the gate,” consistent with Hebrews 13:12.


Conclusion

Hebrews 13:10 teaches that the cross of Christ supersedes the Levitical altar. Those who cling to the old priesthood cannot partake of its benefits, while all who trust in the resurrected Son freely share in the once-for-all atonement, offering continual praise and sacrificial love as their new-covenant service.

What is the significance of the altar mentioned in Hebrews 13:10 for Christians today?
Top of Page
Top of Page