Why can't tabernacle servers eat at altar?
Why are those who serve the tabernacle excluded from eating at the altar in Hebrews 13:10?

Hebrews 13:10 in Full

“We have an altar from which those who serve at the tabernacle have no right to eat.”


Literary and Covenant Context

Hebrews 13:8–16 contrasts the unchanging Christ with the now-obsolete Levitical system. Verses 11-12 remind readers that “the bodies of the animals whose blood is brought into the Most Holy Place by the high priest for sin are burned outside the camp,” and that “Jesus also suffered outside the city gate.” The author exhorts believers to “go to Him outside the camp” (v. 13). The “altar” in v. 10 therefore belongs to the new covenant inaugurated by Christ’s once-for-all sacrifice (Hebrews 9:12, 10:10).


What Priests Could and Could Not Eat under the Mosaic Law

• Most grain and peace offerings: Priests received specified portions (Leviticus 6:16-18; 7:31-36).

• Regular sin and guilt offerings: Priests could eat what was not burned on the altar (Leviticus 6:25-29; 7:6-7).

• Exception—sin offerings whose blood was carried inside the sanctuary (Day of Atonement and certain grave sins): “Any sin offering whose blood is brought into the Tent of Meeting to make atonement in the Holy Place must not be eaten; it must be burned” (Leviticus 6:30). Those offerings were taken “outside the camp” and entirely consumed by fire (Leviticus 16:27).


The Tabernacle Servers’ Legal Disqualification

Hebrews intentionally cites this Day-of-Atonement statute. By law, Levites who “serve the tabernacle” are barred from eating the very offering that accomplishes full atonement, because its blood is carried into the Holy of Holies. Christ fulfills that type (Hebrews 9:24–26). Thus the exclusion in 13:10 is first a matter of Torah itself: those who stay within the old system stand before an altar at which they can never dine.


The Nature of the Christian Altar

The Greek θυσιαστήριον points not to a stone table in Jerusalem but to the once-for-all sacrifice of the crucified-and-risen Lord. Early church writers (e.g., Ignatius, Letter to the Philadelphians 4) and the Didache connect this “altar” with the Lord’s Table, where believers remember Christ’s body and blood (1 Corinthians 10:16-18). Participation is by faith, not lineage (John 6:53-57).


Covenant Incompatibility

Hebrews repeatedly affirms that “the first covenant is obsolete” (8:13). To persist in Levitical ritual after Messiah’s atoning work is to cling to shadows (10:1) and reject substance. Therefore, even apart from Levitical food laws, those who refuse the new covenant have “no right” (ἐξουσίαν οὐκ ἔχουσιν) to its benefits.


Geographic and Typological Fulfillment—“Outside the Camp”

Christ’s crucifixion at Golgotha, verified by first-century sources (John 19:17; Josephus, B.J. 5.12), occurred outside the city walls, perfectly mirroring the burnt sin offering. Archaeological surveys of the so-called “Essene Gate” show the Second-Temple wall line north-west of the traditional site, strengthening the argument that the crucifixion fulfilled Levitical typology in literal geography.


The Lord’s Supper as Present Participation

Believers “eat” at this altar when they partake of Communion in faith (Luke 22:19; 1 Corinthians 11:23-26). The meal proclaims the completed sacrifice, something the ongoing tabernacle service (and its later Temple counterpart) could never perfect (Hebrews 10:11-18).


Theological Ramifications

• Salvation is exclusive to Christ’s atoning work (Acts 4:12).

• Ritual adherence without faith excludes rather than secures access (Matthew 23:13).

• Believers are called to identify with Christ “outside the camp,” embracing reproach and rejecting syncretism (Hebrews 13:13-14).


Practical Exhortation for Today

Do not reach back to obsolete systems—whether ritualistic legalism, works-based morality, or modern relativism—for acceptance with God. Full participation in the grace of God is found only at the altar of the cross and empty tomb. “Therefore let us continually offer to God a sacrifice of praise—the fruit of lips that confess His name” (Hebrews 13:15).


Concise Answer

Those who minister at the earthly tabernacle are excluded because (1) Levitical law bars priests from eating the sin offering whose blood enters the sanctuary—the very type Christ fulfills; (2) the old covenant they uphold is obsolete, rendering them covenantally unauthorized; and (3) the new-covenant “altar” is accessed only by faith in the crucified and risen Messiah, not by Levitical service.

How does Hebrews 13:10 relate to the Old Testament sacrificial system?
Top of Page
Top of Page