How did a new king arise who did not know Joseph in Exodus 1:8? Text of Exodus 1:8 “Then a new king, who did not know Joseph, came to power in Egypt.” Historical Context Joseph rose to power during Egypt’s Middle Kingdom, saved the nation from famine (Genesis 41), and secured favor for his family in Goshen. According to a conservative Ussher-anchored chronology: • Joseph enters Egypt c. 1728 BC. • Joseph dies c. 1635 BC. • The Exodus occurs c. 1491 BC. Roughly two centuries separate Joseph’s death and Moses’ birth, long enough for political realignment, demographic shifts, and cultural amnesia. Egyptian Dynastic Transition Egyptian records show the end of the 13th Dynasty and the rise of Hyksos rulers (15th Dynasty) in the Delta, followed by a native Egyptian “Restoration” (18th Dynasty). Either transition supplies a context in which a king could deliberately sever past alliances. Possible Identification of the New King Hyksos Theory • A foreign Semitic Hyksos ruler (c. 1650 BC) may have regarded Joseph’s people as rival Asiatics. • The Tell el-Dabʿa (Avaris) excavations reveal a large Asiatic settlement contemporaneous with Joseph’s era, including a non-Egyptian tomb containing a multicolored coat–like statue (reported by Manfred Bietak; cf. Genesis 37:3). Native Egyptian Restoration Theory • Ahmose I (c. 1539 BC) expelled Hyksos forces, unified Egypt, and could have viewed Hebrew pastoralists—who resembled Hyksos settlers—as potential collaborators with the former occupiers (Exodus 1:10). Thutmose I View (1446 BC Exodus Timing) • Many conservative scholars identify Thutmose I as the “new king” and Thutmose III as the pharaoh of the oppression, aligning the birth of Moses c. 1526 BC and the Exodus under Amenhotep II c. 1446 BC (cf. 1 Kings 6:1). Thutmose I was a military innovator, anxious to secure the eastern frontier by suppressing Semitic populations in Goshen. How Could He “Not Know” Joseph? Chronological Lapse Two centuries erode personal memory, especially amid regime changes. Monumental inscriptions focus on royal accomplishments, not foreign administrators, so later pharaohs found little incentive to honor Joseph. Political Expedience “Not knowing” reflects official policy. Ignoring Joseph’s legacy enabled a new regime to: 1. Justify forced labor (Exodus 1:11). 2. Consolidate national identity after invasion or civil strife. 3. Reassert loyalty to Egypt’s gods over a memory tied to the Hebrew God. Deliberate Ideological Erasure Egyptian king lists (e.g., the Abydos List) routinely omit disfavored rulers. A similar purge could expunge Joseph from court annals, mirroring modern regimes that rewrite history for ideological ends. Archaeological and Extra-Biblical Data Semitic Population in Goshen • Excavations at Tell el-Dabʿa reveal Asiatic housing patterns, cemeteries, and pastoral artifacts centuries before the conventional Late Bronze habitation, matching the biblical timeline. • Scarab seals bearing the name “Yaqub-har” (Semitic “Jacob-the-ruler”) surface in 14th–15th Dynasty strata, suggesting the remembrance of a patriarchal figure. Administrative Reuse of Storage Cities • Brick-by-brick archaeology at Pithom (Tell el-Maskhuta) shows massive brick stores with straw, then with chopped stubble, matching Exodus 5:7-12. Literary Parallels • Papyrus Anastasi VI describes nomadic Semites entering Egypt for pasture, echoing Genesis 47:4. • The Ipuwer Papyrus laments Nile turning to blood, death of firstborn, and social upheaval; its precise date is debated but preserves memory of calamities reminiscent of the plagues. Theological Implications Covenant Fulfillment God foretold Israel’s oppression and deliverance (Genesis 15:13-14). The rise of a king who “did not know Joseph” sets the stage for Yahweh’s redemptive power, prefiguring the greater deliverance in Christ (Luke 9:31; 1 Corinthians 5:7). Divine Sovereignty in Suffering While Egypt forgot Joseph, God remembered His covenant (Exodus 2:24). Persecution served to multiply Israel (Exodus 1:12) and manifest God’s glory over the gods of Egypt (Exodus 12:12). Typology of Christ Joseph, a savior in famine, is forgotten; Christ, the greater Savior, is ignored by many. Yet just as God vindicated His covenant through the Exodus, He vindicated His Son through the resurrection (Acts 2:24), attested by more than 500 witnesses (1 Corinthians 15:6) and documented in early creeds (e.g., 1 Corinthians 15:3-5) within five years of the event. Application for Believers Cultural Memory and Witness Societies that forget God’s past acts risk oppression and moral decay. Believers must recount God’s mighty deeds (Psalm 78:4), preserving historical faith. Trust Amid Opposition Just as Israel’s hardship preceded deliverance, present hostility toward Christian witness cannot thwart God’s purposes (Romans 8:28). The resurrection guarantees ultimate vindication. Summary The “new king who did not know Joseph” arose through a dynastic shift, political calculus, and intentional suppression of history. Archaeology corroborates a large Semitic presence, massive building projects with brick-making identical to Exodus details, and literary records of Egypt-wide catastrophes. Linguistically, “did not know” conveys covenant rejection, not mere ignorance. Historically and theologically, this verse inaugurates the Exodus narrative, demonstrating God’s sovereign orchestration of history to fulfill His redemptive promises, culminating in the resurrection of Jesus Christ. |
    |