How does Acts 4:6 link to Jesus' trials?
In what ways does Acts 4:6 connect to Jesus' trials before religious leaders?

Setting the Scene

Acts 4 opens with Peter and John arrested for preaching Christ after the healing of the lame man (Acts 3). Luke then records the makeup of the council that will question them:

“and Annas the high priest was there, along with Caiaphas, John, Alexander, and others of the high priest’s family.” (Acts 4:6)


Identifying the Key Players

• Annas – the former high priest, still wielding enormous influence (cf. John 18:13).

• Caiaphas – the official high priest during Jesus’ trial (Matthew 26:57).

• John and Alexander – likely sons or close relatives of Annas, part of the same power circle.

• “All of the high-priestly family” – the larger Sanhedrin leadership that had orchestrated Jesus’ condemnation.


Links to Jesus’ Trials

• Same leadership, same venue

– Jesus was led “first to Annas” and then to Caiaphas (John 18:12-24).

– Peter and John now stand before the very men who condemned Jesus only weeks earlier (Acts 4:6-7).

• Same hostility toward the name of Jesus

– Jesus: “If You are the Christ, tell us” (Luke 22:67).

– Apostles: “By what power or what name did you do this?” (Acts 4:7).

• Peter’s personal turnaround

– Courtyard of Caiaphas: Peter denied the Lord (Luke 22:54-62).

– Council chamber of Caiaphas: Peter, “filled with the Holy Spirit,” boldly proclaims the risen Lord (Acts 4:8-12).

• Fulfillment of Jesus’ words

– Jesus had warned: “They will deliver you to synagogues and prisons…This will be your opportunity to bear witness” (Luke 21:12-13).

Acts 4 shows the very first fulfillment—same religious court, same accusations, now met with Spirit-empowered testimony.


Theological Significance

• Continuity of rejection

– The Sanhedrin’s resistance moves seamlessly from Jesus to His apostles, confirming Psalm 118:22, “The stone the builders rejected has become the cornerstone,” cited by Peter in this setting (Acts 4:11).

• Validation of apostolic message

– Luke’s precise historical note roots the gospel in verifiable events. The identical leaders who crucified Jesus now hear undeniable evidence of His resurrection power through a healed beggar (Acts 4:14).

• Contrast of authority

– Human authority: Annas, Caiaphas, and their lineage seek to silence the name.

– Divine authority: “There is no other name under heaven given to men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).


Personal Takeaway

The same powerful group that once intimidated Peter could no longer do so, because the risen Christ had filled him with the Spirit. Scripture’s seamless narrative invites confidence: the historical record is accurate, the spiritual reality is living, and the name that overcame the council is the name that saves today.

How can believers today stand firm when facing opposition from authorities?
Top of Page
Top of Page