What role does Satan play in Judas' actions in Luke 22:4? Immediate Narrative Context Luke places Satan’s incursion (v. 3) immediately before Judas’ negotiation (v. 4). The sequence is deliberate: the evangelist attributes the initiative behind the plot to a personal, external malign intelligence—Satan—while recording Judas’ own calculated participation (“he went and conferred”). Luke 4:13 says Satan looked for an “opportune time”; Luke 22 is that time. Biblical Portrait of Satanic Influence 1 Chron 21:1 shows Satan “standing up against Israel” by inciting David. Job 1–2 depicts Satan agitating circumstances but God upholding limits. In the New Testament Satan “puts” betrayal into Judas’ heart (John 13:2) and subsequently “enters” him again at the supper (John 13:27). The pattern: satanic instigation, human assent, ensuing action. Parallel Gospel Testimony Matthew 26:14-16 emphasizes Judas’ greed (30 pieces of silver). Mark 14:10-11 highlights Judas’ timely approach after the anointing at Bethany. John adds Satanic agency in two stages (13:2, 27). All agree Judas is morally culpable, while John and Luke supply the invisible dimension. Prophetic Fulfillment and Divine Sovereignty Psalm 41:9—“Even my close friend…has lifted up his heel against me”—is cited in John 13:18. Zechariah 11:12-13 foreshadows the thirty shekels and the potter’s field (Matthew 27:9-10). Acts 1:16-20, quoting Psalm 69 and 109, views Judas’ betrayal as foreseen and folded into God’s redemptive plan. Thus Satan’s scheme paradoxically advances the very atonement he opposes (1 Corinthians 2:8). Human Responsibility and Satanic Agency Luke later records Jesus saying, “The Son of Man goes as it has been determined, but woe to that man who betrays Him” (22:22). Determinism does not annul culpability; the “woe” affirms moral accountability. Judas chooses to act, yet Scripture insists the impulse is satanically energized. Psychological and Behavioral Considerations Greed (John 12:6), disillusionment with a non-militant Messiah, and wounded pride after the rebuke at Bethany (Matthew 26:8-10) create cognitive dissonance that Satan exploits. Contemporary behavioral science recognizes that external suggestion gains traction where internal appetite already leans (James 1:14-15). Historical-Archaeological Notes 1. The chief priests’ meeting likely occurred in the palace complex excavated south-west of the Temple Mount, matching Josephus’ descriptions. 2. Thirty Tyrian shekels from the first century, discovered in Jerusalem’s Herodian strata, match the silver pieces Judas received, illustrating the historicity of the monetary detail. Pastoral and Apologetic Application 1. No one drifts into apostasy overnight; incremental compromise invites satanic leverage. 2. Divine foreknowledge and sovereignty coexist with human choice, nullifying objections that Scripture teaches fatalism. 3. The unanimous manuscript tradition and multiple-attested Gospel narrative counter claims that Judas’ betrayal is legendary. Summary Answer In Luke 22:4 Satan functions as the instigator who “enters” Judas, energizing and guiding his decision to seek out the priests. The devil supplies malignant impetus, yet Judas willingly cooperates, acting from his own motives of greed and disappointment. Scripture presents their roles as concurrent: Satan’s agency fulfills prophecy and propels redemptive history, while Judas bears personal responsibility for his treachery. |
    |