Leviticus 20:6 in OT law context?
How does Leviticus 20:6 fit into the broader context of Old Testament law?

Text of Leviticus 20:6

“Anyone who turns to mediums or spiritists and prostitutes himself with them, I will set My face against that person and cut him off from his people.”


Placement inside Leviticus 17 – 26 (“The Holiness Code”)

Chapters 17–26 form a literary unit that shows Israel how to live as a nation set apart (Leviticus 20:7–8). Chapter 19 commands positive holiness (“be holy,” Leviticus 19:2); chapter 20 enforces that holiness with specific sanctions. Verse 6 sits in a subsection (vv. 1–8) where Yahweh links idolatrous worship and sexual immorality to capital or banishment penalties, stressing that spiritual infidelity is covenant treason.


Holiness and Covenant Fidelity

1. Exclusive allegiance: The first commandment (Exodus 20:3) bans rival gods; Leviticus 20:6 bans rival spiritual channels.

2. “Prostitutes himself”: the Hebrew root זנה (zanah) elsewhere forbids literal sexual prostitution (Leviticus 19:29). Here it is applied metaphorically to spiritual unfaithfulness, underscoring that dabbling with the occult equals adultery against Yahweh (cf. Hosea 4:12).

3. Sanctifying Name theology: To “set My face against” (cf. Leviticus 17:10) evokes the covenant blessings/curses formula (Leviticus 26; Deuteronomy 28). The divine presence that blesses the obedient (Numbers 6:24-26) becomes adversarial toward the defiant.


Mediums, Spiritists, and the Ancient Near Eastern Context

Archaeological tablets from Ugarit (KTU 1.6:ii) and Mari (ARM 26.205) list šâʾilu (“inquirer”) specialists analogous to the ʾōb (“medium”) and yiddĕʿōnî (“spiritist”) of Leviticus. These practitioners attempted to consult the dead or chthonic deities for guidance—activities depicted in the Epic of Gilgamesh XI and condemned in Deuteronomy 18:9-14. Israel’s law severed such practices from the nation to guard doctrinal purity and to protect against demonic deception (cf. 1 Corinthians 10:20).


“Cut Off” versus Capital Execution

Leviticus 20 allots death by stoning for Molech worship (vv. 2-5) and certain sexual sins (vv. 10-16). Verse 6 prescribes karet (“cut off”), a sanction that may include premature death by divine hand (Numbers 17:10), infertility (Leviticus 20:21), or exile (Ezra 10:8). The contrast shows graded severity yet common purpose: remove covenant pollution.


Ethical Continuity into the New Testament

1. Jesus acknowledges Satanic kingdoms (Matthew 12:26), casts out demons (Mark 1:34), and refuses illegitimate revelation (Luke 4:12).

2. Acts 16:16-18 shows Paul confronting a πνεῦμα πύθωνα (“spirit of divination”); he expels it rather than syncretize.

3. Galatians 5:20 lists “sorcery” (φαρμακεία) as a “work of the flesh,” echoing Levitical exclusion.

4. Revelation 21:8 promises the lake of fire for “the sorcerers,” revealing eschatological continuity of the ban.


Christological and Typological Trajectory

By outlawing rival mediators, the Torah prepares Israel to recognize the true Mediator (Deuteronomy 18:15; 1 Timothy 2:5). Christ alone rises from the dead (1 Corinthians 15:3-8) and alone may reveal God’s will (Hebrews 1:1-2). Occult consultation is therefore a counterfeit resurrection and a counterfeit revelation.


Archaeological Corroboration of the Holiness Paradigm

1. Kuntillet ʿAjrud inscriptions (8th c. BC) invoke “Yahweh of Samaria,” illustrating how syncretism threatened Israel, mirroring the prohibitions.

2. The Ketef Hinnom silver scrolls (late 7th c. BC) preserve the priestly blessing of Numbers 6, establishing that “face” language (“the Lord make His face shine upon you”) was familiar and thus made the Leviticus threat more poignant.


Legal and Civil Function in Ancient Israel

Theocratic Israel lacked modern “religious freedom”; worship was public law. Mediums destabilized covenantal identity just as counterfeit currency destabilizes an economy. The civil sanction protected national vocation to birth the Messiah and Scripture itself (Romans 9:4-5).


Defending the Moral Rationale

1. Ontological truth: Only the Creator can disclose the unseen; mediums traffic in deception or demonic influence (2 Corinthians 11:14).

2. Protective love: Like prohibiting arsenic in food, God bans occultism to safeguard life (John 10:10).

3. Missional clarity: Israel was to display God’s wisdom to nations (Deuteronomy 4:6-8). Reliance on forbidden arts would blur that witness.


Contemporary Application

1. Reject “harmless” horoscopes, Ouija boards, and ancestral consultations.

2. Seek divine guidance through Scripture, prayer, and the indwelling Spirit (John 16:13).

3. Offer compassionate evangelism to those ensnared (Acts 19:19 shows public renunciation of occult paraphernalia).


Conclusion

Leviticus 20:6 functions as a linchpin in the Holiness Code, fortifying Israel’s exclusive covenant with Yahweh by outlawing occult mediation. It harmonizes with the Ten Commandments, anticipates New Testament teaching, and remains morally instructive today. By affirming God’s absolute authority over the unseen, the verse drives humanity toward the risen Christ, the only legitimate bridge between God and mankind.

What does Leviticus 20:6 reveal about God's view on consulting mediums and spiritists?
Top of Page
Top of Page