Link John 6:56 to communion concept?
How does John 6:56 relate to the concept of communion?

Text of John 6:56

“Whoever eats My flesh and drinks My blood remains in Me, and I in him.”


Immediate Context in John 6

John 6 records the feeding of the 5,000 (vv. 1-13), Jesus’ walking on the sea (vv. 16-21), and the ensuing “Bread of Life” discourse (vv. 22-71). The miraculous multiplication of bread establishes Jesus as the true Giver of bread; the discourse then moves from physical provision to spiritual nourishment. Verses 53-58 climax with an emphatic four-fold repetition of “eat…drink” and “live forever,” culminating in v. 56’s mutual indwelling: the believer “remains” (Greek μένω, menō) in Christ, and Christ in the believer. This abiding language links the chapter to John 15:4-5, where fruitfulness flows from union with the Vine.


Old Testament Foreshadowing: Passover and Manna

1. Passover lamb: Exodus 12:7, 13 required the blood-marked dwelling for deliverance; eating the roasted lamb signified identification with the covenant community.

2. Wilderness manna: Exodus 16 and Numbers 11 depict bread from heaven sustaining Israel; Psalm 78:24 calls it “grain of heaven.” Jesus explicitly compares Himself to this manna (John 6:49-51). The Passover meal and daily manna together prefigure life through consumption of the sacrificial provision of God—fulfilled in Christ’s self-offering.


Institution of the Lord’s Supper

Matthew 26:26-28; Mark 14:22-24; Luke 22:19-20; and 1 Corinthians 11:23-26 record Jesus taking bread, saying, “This is My body,” and the cup, “This is My blood of the covenant.” The imperative “do this in remembrance of Me” establishes an ongoing ordinance. John’s Gospel omits a traditional Last Supper narrative yet supplies its theological underpinnings in chapter 6; the Synoptics supply the event; Paul supplies apostolic exposition.


Union with Christ: The Core Meaning

John 6:56 stresses mutual indwelling—“remains in Me, and I in him.” The imagery transcends mere symbolism; it evokes covenant union:

1 Corinthians 10:16 — “Is not the cup of blessing…a participation in the blood of Christ?”

Colossians 1:27 — “Christ in you, the hope of glory.”

Communion (koinōnia) is thus both vertical (union with Christ) and horizontal (union with His body, the Church).


Real Presence and Memorial Dimensions

Believers historically affirm that Christ is genuinely present in the Supper, though articulations differ:

• Transubstantiation (Roman Catholic, Fourth Lateran Council 1215).

• Consubstantiation/Sacramental Union (Lutheran).

• Spiritual Presence (Reformed; Calvin, Institutes IV.17).

• Memorial View (Zwingli).

John 6:56 supports at minimum the Spiritual Presence view: the life-giving presence of Christ is received by faith through the appointed elements. The physical elements point to but do not exhaust the reality.


Covenant Renewal

“Blood of the covenant” (Luke 22:20) echoes Exodus 24:8, where Moses sprinkled blood on the people. In both testaments covenant is ratified with blood and a meal (cf. Genesis 31:54). Each communion celebration renews our covenant vows, proclaiming “the Lord’s death until He comes” (1 Corinthians 11:26).


Perseverance and Assurance

John 6:54, 56 connect eating and drinking with present eternal life and future resurrection. Communion thus becomes a God-ordained rhythm reinforcing assurance (Hebrews 10:22-25). Persistent participation evidences genuine faith (cf. Acts 2:42).


Spiritual and Physical Nourishment Parallel

Just as the divinely engineered digestive system converts bread into bodily life, so participation in Christ assimilates His life into ours. The Creator designed both processes; the material illustrates the spiritual (Romans 1:20). Intelligent design studies on irreducible complexity (e.g., the blood-clotting cascade) underscore the Creator’s wisdom behind the biblical metaphor of “blood” as life (Leviticus 17:11).


Historical Practice and Patristic Witness

• Didache 9-10 (c. A.D. 50-70) instructs the church to give thanks over cup and bread, calling it “spiritual food and drink.”

• Ignatius, Smyrnaeans 7:1 (c. A.D. 110): the Eucharist “is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ.”

• Justin Martyr, First Apology 66 (c. A.D. 155): “not as common bread and drink.”

• Irenaeus, Against Heresies IV.18.5 (c. A.D. 180): the elements “receive the Word of God” and so become the Eucharist.

The uniform testimony affirms a high view of Christ’s presence, resonating with John 6:56.


Archaeological and Extra-Biblical Corroboration

• Early Christian catacomb art (e.g., Catacomb of Priscilla, 2nd cent.) depicts a communal meal with fish and bread motifs, echoing John 6 and the Eucharist.

• The Megiddo church mosaic (c. A.D. 230) includes the inscription, “To God Jesus Christ,” with images of bread baskets, indicating established communion practice.

Such finds align with Acts 20:7’s reference to breaking bread on “the first day of the week.”


Miraculous Validation

The bodily resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:3-8) validates Jesus’ authority to institute communion. Eyewitness groups, hostile critic conversion (Paul), and empty tomb evidence form a cumulative case. Post-resurrection meal scenes (Luke 24:30-35; John 21:13) further link the risen Lord with table fellowship, prefiguring ongoing communion. Documented healings during the Lord’s Supper—e.g., increased mobility after prayer and bread-cup participation in modern missionary reports—bear experiential witness to Christ’s living presence.


Answering Common Objections

1. Cannibalism charge (cf. John 6:52): Jesus clarifies the spiritual nature (v. 63, “The Spirit gives life; the flesh profits nothing”).

2. “Purely symbolic” claim: The language of mutual indwelling surpasses bare symbolism; Paul calls it “participation” (koinōnia).

3. Chronological objection: “John lacks communion institution.” John strategically supplies theological depth complementing Synoptic chronology, a hallmark of eyewitness diversity without contradiction.


Practical Application

Approach the table with self-examination (1 Corinthians 11:28), faith (Hebrews 11:6), and unity (1 Corinthians 10:17). Regular communion cultivates gratitude, repentance, and mission: having fed on Christ, believers are sent to feed the hungry—physically and spiritually (Matthew 28:19-20).


Evangelistic Dimension

The Supper preaches: bread broken, cup poured, Savior crucified yet alive. Inviting unbelievers to witness (though not partake) can spark gospel conversations—much as the Ethiopian eunuch was drawn to Isaiah’s suffering servant (Acts 8:32-35).


Conclusion

John 6:56 anchors communion in the abiding, life-imparting union between Christ and believer. Rooted in Passover typology, vindicated by the resurrection, practiced from the apostolic era, attested textually and archaeologically, and experientially confirmed, the verse summons the church to continual, faithful participation until the day we drink anew with Him in the Father’s kingdom (Matthew 26:29).

What does 'eats My flesh and drinks My blood' mean in John 6:56?
Top of Page
Top of Page