How does Luke 22:68 reflect on the nature of divine foreknowledge? Text of Luke 22:68 “But if I were to ask, you would not answer; and if I were to question, you would not respond.” Immediate Context Luke records the illegal, night-time interrogation of Jesus before the Sanhedrin. Verses 67-70 form a literary hinge between the arrest and the formal morning verdict. In v. 67 the council demands, “If You are the Christ, tell us.” Jesus replies that they will not believe His answer. Verse 68 reinforces the point: even if He questioned them, they would refuse dialogue. The statement exposes willful unbelief, setting a backdrop for the doctrine of divine foreknowledge: God knows not only future events but the inner disposition that rejects revealed truth (cf. John 2:24-25). Key Terms and Greek Analysis • ἐρωτήσω (erōtēsō, “I were to ask”) and ἀποκριθῆτε (apokrithēte, “you would answer”) are aorist subjunctive verbs, creating a hypothetical conditional. • ἀπολύσητέ (apolysēte, “release,” v. 68 Majority Text) appears in some manuscripts but is omitted in NA28; either reading preserves the same thrust—no positive response is forthcoming. The grammatical construction implies certainty on Jesus’ part about their refusal: His knowledge is exhaustive and unerring. Divine Foreknowledge Demonstrated in the Gospel Narrative 1. Prediction of Peter’s denial (Luke 22:31-34) fulfilled precisely in vv. 56-62. 2. Prophecy of scourging, mockery, crucifixion, and resurrection (Luke 18:31-33) realized in chs. 22–24. 3. Foreknowledge reaches personal, political, and cosmic levels (Luke 21:6, 24, 27). Luke 22:68 is another micro-example—Jesus knows the council’s immediate non-response. Old Testament Foretelling of the Passion Psalm 22, Isaiah 53, and Daniel 9:26 anticipate the Messiah’s suffering centuries in advance, confirming Yahweh’s sovereign comprehension of history. The Dead Sea Scroll 1QIsaᵃ (dated ~125 BC) preserves Isaiah 53 almost verbatim, demonstrating textual stability before Christ and removing any possibility of post-event editing. Christ’s Omniscience and Trinitarian Foreknowledge Luke 22:68 depicts Jesus exercising an attribute otherwise reserved for God alone (Isaiah 46:10). Earlier in Luke, He reads hearts (5:22). This coalesces with Johannine declarations (John 13:11) and apostolic testimony (Colossians 2:3) that “all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge” dwell in Him. The Spirit likewise “searches all things, even the depths of God” (1 Corinthians 2:10). Foreknowledge, therefore, is Trinitarian—Father, Son, and Spirit act in perfect accord (Acts 2:23; 1 Peter 1:2). Philosophical Implications of Foreknowledge and Human Freedom Luke 22:68 affirms divine certainty without negating human responsibility. The council’s refusal is freely chosen yet foreknown. Classical Christian theism distinguishes certainty from necessity: God’s infallible knowledge does not coerce the will (cf. Augustine, De Libero Arbitrio III.3). Contemporary modal logic frames this as God’s knowledge of future contingents in the “actual” possible world without eliminating alternate possibilities. Historical and Archaeological Corroboration 1. Caiaphas’s ossuary (discovered 1990) confirms the historicity of the high priest named in the Passion narratives (Luke 3:2; 22:54). 2. The Pilate inscription at Caesarea (1961) validates the prefect who authorizes crucifixion (Luke 23:1-4). These finds buttress Luke’s reliability and, by extension, the accuracy of Luke 22:68. Counter-Critiques Answered • Claim: Foreknowledge is incompatible with genuine dialogue. Response: Jesus’ question in v. 68 is not for information but for moral exposure; the council’s freedom is intact, paralleling God’s interrogatives in Genesis 3:9 and Job 38:4. • Claim: Predictive elements were retrofitted. Response: Multiple independent attestation (Synoptics, Paul, early creedal formulae—1 Cor 15:3-5) predate AD 40, long before full theological development. Integration with Systematic Theology 1. Theology Proper: God is omniscient (Psalm 139:4). 2. Christology: Jesus shares divine attributes, confirming His deity. 3. Soteriology: The cross was “by God’s set purpose and foreknowledge” (Acts 2:23); Luke 22:68 participates in this motif. 4. Eschatology: If God’s knowledge of near-term events is flawless, His promises of final restoration are equally certain (Revelation 21:5). Conclusion Luke 22:68 unites textual precision, historical reliability, and theological depth to display divine foreknowledge. Jesus fully anticipates rejection, mirroring Yahweh’s timeless grasp of human response. Such knowledge magnifies God’s sovereignty, invites honest engagement, and assures believers that redemptive history unfolds exactly as foreseen “before the foundation of the world” (1 Peter 1:20). |
    |