How does Matthew 15:2 challenge the authority of religious traditions? Matthew 15:2—The Authority of Divine Revelation over Human Tradition Text “Why do Your disciples break the tradition of the elders? They do not wash their hands before they eat.” (Matthew 15:2) Immediate Literary Context Matthew 15:1-20 records a confrontation in Galilee between Jesus and a delegation of scribes and Pharisees from Jerusalem. Their accusation concerns ritual hand-washing—a practice codified in the developing Oral Law (later preserved in the Mishnah, tractate Berakhot 51a; Yadayim 1-4). Jesus responds by contrasting “the commandment of God” with “the tradition of men” (v.3, 6). The parallel account in Mark 7:1-13 provides the same substance, underscoring the event’s historicity by multiple attestation. Historical-Cultural Background of the Tradition 1. Origin of the Custom: Exodus 30:17-21 required priests to wash hands and feet before tabernacle service. Pharisaic schools generalized this priestly regulation to all Jews before every meal, considering the dining table a miniature altar. 2. Authority Structure: By the first century A.D. the Pharisees treated the Oral Law as equal to—or, functionally, above—the written Torah. Josephus (Ant. 13.297) confirms that the Pharisees claimed “a succession of oral traditions.” The Qumran community (1QS 5:13-14) shows a parallel yet sect-distinct concern with ritual purity, corroborating the pervasiveness of such customs. Scripture vs. Tradition: Jesus’ Method of Evaluation 1. Commandment Priority: Jesus cites Isaiah 29:13 (LXX close to wording) to expose how human prescriptions can “nullify” divine commands (Matthew 15:6). 2. Ethical Weighting: By invoking the fifth commandment (Exodus 20:12) against the Pharisaic “Corban” loophole (Mark 7:11), He demonstrates that man-made rules often sidestep moral imperatives. 3. Internal Cleansing: Verses 17-20 establish that moral defilement originates in the heart, pre-figuring the New Covenant emphasis on internal transformation (Jeremiah 31:31-34; Ezekiel 36:26-27). Challenge to Religious Traditions: Key Theological Principles • Ultimate Authority Rests in Scripture: Psalm 119:89—“Your word, O LORD, is everlasting.” Any subsequent rule must conform to this immutable standard. • Perspicuity and Sufficiency: Deuteronomy 30:11-14 shows God’s commands are “not too difficult… nor beyond reach,” refuting claims that an elite oral corpus is necessary for understanding. • Continuity of Revelation: Jesus does not dismiss all tradition—He fulfills it (Matthew 5:17). What He rejects is any tradition that competes with or eclipses canonical revelation. Implications for Apostolic Christianity Acts 17:11 commends the Bereans for testing even apostolic teaching against the Scriptures. Paul warns against “philosophy and empty deceit according to human tradition” (Colossians 2:8). The apostolic pattern therefore mirrors Jesus’ stance: church customs are acceptable only insofar as they echo and apply biblical doctrine. Philosophical and Behavioral Significance Human regulatory systems offer a semblance of moral control but cannot regenerate the heart (Romans 8:3). Behavioral science affirms that external compliance absent inner conviction fosters hypocrisy—precisely the fault Jesus exposes (Matthew 15:7-8). True virtue arises when divine truth renews the mind (Romans 12:2). Modern Applications • Liturgical Practices: Preferences in music style, dress code, or service format must remain subordinate to explicit biblical warrants of worship in spirit and truth (John 4:24). • Doctrinal Formulations: Councils and confessions are valuable, yet they serve as guides, not governors, of faith. • Ethical Debates: When cultural norms conflict with scriptural absolutes on life, marriage, or justice, believers must stand with the “commandment of God.” Conclusion Matthew 15:2 functions as a watershed text that exposes the peril of elevating religious tradition above divine revelation. By reinstating Scripture as the supreme norm, Jesus liberates conscience and redirects devotion toward God’s intent rather than man-made regulation. In every generation the question resurfaces: will the people of God heed the unchanging Word or bow to evolving customs? The passage insists that only alignment with the former secures authentic worship and true obedience. |
    |