Matthew 21:30's take on faith obedience?
How does Matthew 21:30 challenge the concept of obedience in faith?

Context of the Parable of the Two Sons

Matthew places the parable during Jesus’ final week, after the triumphal entry and before the Olivet Discourse. The Lord addresses chief priests and elders who question His authority (Matthew 21:23). By employing a simple family vignette, Jesus exposes their disobedience masked by religious rhetoric. The vineyard imagery recalls Isaiah 5, signaling Israel as God’s planting and the leaders’ covenant duty to work faithfully.


The Text

Matthew 21:28-30 :

“‘But what do you think? A man had two sons; he went to the first and said, “Son, go and work today in the vineyard.”

‘I will not,’ he replied. But later he changed his mind and went.

Then the father went to the second son and said the same thing. He answered, “I will, sir,” but he did not go.’”


Verbal Profession vs. Active Obedience

The second son’s “I will, sir” illustrates compliance in words alone. Jesus presses that lip service does not equal obedience. This squares with James 2:17,26—“faith without deeds is dead.” Scripture unites genuine belief with responsive action (John 14:15; 1 John 2:3-4). The verse therefore challenges any concept of faith that stops at intellectual assent or polite religiosity.


Repentance and Change of Mind

The first son “changed his mind” (Greek: metamelētheis), paralleling biblical repentance: a reversal of will that issues in new behavior (Acts 3:19). True obedience flows from repentant faith, not initial promises. Jesus positions repentance—not pedigree or ritual—as the decisive divide between the obedient and disobedient.


Faith Demonstrated Through Works

Paul writes, “The only thing that counts is faith expressing itself through love” (Galatians 5:6). Matthew 21:30 illustrates the converse: confessed faith that fails to express itself. While salvation is by grace alone (Ephesians 2:8-9), the accompanying verse 10 shows believers “created in Christ Jesus to do good works.” The parable underscores that saving faith is intrinsically productive.


Theological Implications for Justification and Sanctification

1. Forensic justification rests on Christ’s finished work (Romans 5:1).

2. Sanctification evidences that justification (Hebrews 12:14).

The second son personifies the one who seeks justification by verbal orthodoxy without undergoing sanctifying transformation. Jesus’ verdict (v. 31) condemns such inconsistency.


Exposure of Religious Hypocrisy

Jesus aims at the religious elite who loudly affirm Torah yet reject the Messiah. Their pious phrases mirror the son’s “sir,” but their refusal to “go” echoes their resistance to John’s baptism (21:32). The verse thus unmasks hypocrisy: external religiosity minus interior submission (cf. Isaiah 29:13).


Old Testament Echoes and Vineyard Imagery

Israel as vineyard: Isaiah 5; Psalm 80:8-16. The owner’s expectation of fruit typifies God’s demand for covenant obedience (Deuteronomy 10:12-13). By refusing to work, the second son recapitulates Israel’s recurring pattern of professing loyalty while neglecting obedience (Ezekiel 33:31-32).


Contemporary Application: The Church and Cultural Christianity

Many today affirm Christian identity—church membership, doctrinal assent—yet resist Christ’s lordship in vocation, sexuality, stewardship, and evangelism. Matthew 21:30 presses each hearer: Do my actions corroborate my creed? It warns that sacramental participation or verbal liturgy cannot substitute for obedient faith.


Evangelistic Appeal: Responding Today

Jesus’ question, “Which of the two did the will of his father?” (v. 31), demands a personal answer. The tax collectors and prostitutes “believed” (21:32) and were saved; religious authorities did not. The risen Christ still calls, “Follow Me” (John 21:22). Repent, believe the gospel (Mark 1:15), and let obedience authenticate faith.


Conclusion

Matthew 21:30 challenges the concept of obedience in faith by exposing the insufficiency of words detached from works, elevating repentance-formed action as the hallmark of true belief, unmasking religious pretense, and calling every generation to a faith that goes to the vineyard and labors for the Father’s glory.

What is the significance of the second son's change of mind in Matthew 21:30?
Top of Page
Top of Page