Why does Pharaoh mention evil in Exodus 10:10, and what does it signify? Text and Setting “Then Pharaoh said to them, ‘May the LORD be with you if I ever let you and your little ones go! Clearly you are bent on evil.’” (Exodus 10:10) This statement is uttered at the turning point between the seventh and eighth plagues, after Moses has requested that every Israelite—“young and old … sons and daughters … flocks and herds” (10:9)—be released for a festival to Yahweh in the wilderness. Pharaoh’s response is both a curse and an accusation, revealing his hardened heart and his mistrust of Israel’s intentions. Historical-Cultural Background 1. Political Suspicion Egypt depended on a vast slave-labor force for monumental building. An exodus of hundreds of thousands would cripple the economy (cf. archaeological evidence for labor-camps at Tell el-Daba and pyramidal complexes). Pharaoh therefore interprets the request as an insurrection. 2. Astrological Omen Ancient Egyptian texts (e.g., the “Coffin Texts,” spell 1130) personify the malevolent star “Raʿ” (literally “the evil one”) that brings doom. Jewish midrash (Exod. R. 13.3) notes that Pharaoh might be referring to this star: “The star Raʿ is rising against you.” If so, Pharaoh taunts that a divine omen of catastrophe attends Israel’s plan. 3. Divine Irony By invoking “evil,” Pharaoh unwittingly prophesies the plagues that will soon devastate Egypt, culminating in the death of the firstborn. His curse rebounds on himself, illustrating Proverbs 26:27, “He who digs a pit will fall into it.” Literary Function in the Plague Narrative 1. Escalation of Conflict Each plague widens the rift between Yahweh’s sovereignty and Pharaoh’s obstinacy. The accusation of “evil” frames Israel’s worship—as commanded by God—as sedition, highlighting Pharaoh’s inversion of moral order (cf. Isaiah 5:20). 2. Foreshadowing of Deliverance Pharaoh’s refusal sets the stage for the Passover. The “evil” he predicts for Israel actually becomes the “great deliverance” (Genesis 50:20) God effects through judgment on Egypt. Canonical and Theological Connections 1. Hardness of Heart Exodus reiterates that Pharaoh “hardened his heart” (10:1, 20, 27). His mislabeling of Yahweh’s worship as “evil” exposes sin’s blinding effect (Romans 1:21-22). 2. Good vs. Evil Motif Scripture repeatedly contrasts true worship with idolatrous oppression (Joshua 24:15; 1 Kings 18:17-18). Pharaoh embodies the archetypal tyrant calling good “evil” and evil “good,” fulfilled ultimately in the Antichrist figure (2 Thessalonians 2:4). 3. Typology of Salvation The Exodus prefigures Christ’s redemptive act (1 Corinthians 5:7). As Pharaoh calls Israel’s departure “evil,” so later authorities brand Jesus “a deceiver” (Matthew 27:63). God overturns both verdicts by miraculous deliverance and resurrection power. Archaeological and Extra-Biblical Corroboration 1. Ipuwer Papyrus (Leiden 344) records “plague throughout the land” and servants fleeing their masters, echoing the social upheaval Exodus describes. 2. Grave stelae from the 13th-century BC tombs at Saqqara contain curses against slaves who “plot evil” by running away—parallels Pharaoh’s fear. 3. Astronomical ceilings in Karnak list a malevolent star “Apedemak-Raʿ,” demonstrating Egypt’s belief in ominous celestial portents. Practical and Devotional Implications 1. Discernment Believers must evaluate accusations in light of God’s revealed will. Worship and obedience may be mischaracterized by hostile cultures. 2. Assurance When the world predicts “evil” for those who follow the Lord, God turns it to good (Romans 8:28). The Exodus and the Resurrection are twin pillars proving His faithfulness. 3. Evangelistic Point Just as Pharaoh’s words betrayed his own rebellion, unbelief today often projects its moral state onto God’s people. The remedy is repentance and faith in the risen Christ, who conquers both moral evil and calamity. Summary Pharaoh’s reference to “evil” in Exodus 10:10 reveals a mixture of political paranoia, astrological superstition, and moral inversion. Textually secure and contextually coherent, the verse underscores the broader biblical theme that human rulers who oppose God inevitably mislabel righteousness as wickedness—an error God overturns by mighty acts, climaxing in the ultimate deliverance through Jesus Christ. |
    |