What role do the "forces" play in Daniel 11:31? Definition and Immediate Context “His forces will rise up and desecrate the temple fortress. They will abolish the daily sacrifice and set up the abomination of desolation.” (Daniel 11:31) The Hebrew term zĕrōʿîm (“arms,” “military forces,” derived from zĕrō·aʿ, “arm” or “strength”) refers to an armed contingent acting under the authority of the contemptible king of verse 21. The “forces” function as the king’s physical means of executing the three actions named in the verse: (1) rising up against the holy place, (2) removing regular worship, and (3) installing the abominable image. Historical Fulfillment under Antiochus IV Epiphanes (c. 167 BC) 1 Maccabees 1:29-31 records that Antiochus sent a “chief collector of tribute… with a large force” who attacked Jerusalem “with great arrogance.” Josephus, Antiquities 12.5.3, says troops “polluted the temple.” These forces: • stormed the citadel (“temple fortress,” cf. Acra); • ended the tamîd (the twice-daily burnt offering; see Exodus 29:38-42); • erected a pagan altar, very likely to Zeus Olympios (1 Macc 1:54). Strategic Role of the Forces A. Military Instrument—They physically seized the Temple Mount, enforcing Hellenistic rule. B. Religious Instrument—Their presence enabled inspectors to compel worship of the king’s gods. C. Psychological Instrument—Massacres and desecration demoralized covenant-keepers, fueling either apostasy (Daniel 11:32a) or resistance (11:32b). Abolition of the Daily Sacrifice The army guarded the sanctuary entrances, preventing priests from offering the morning and evening lambs prescribed in the Torah. The suspension lasted “2,300 evenings and mornings” (Daniel 8:14), fitting the period from Kislev 167 BC to Kislev 164 BC, when Judas Maccabeus rededicated the temple. Setting Up the Abomination of Desolation The same forces installed the foreign altar and, according to 2 Maccabees 6:2, sacrificed swine upon it. The phrase “abomination of desolation” (shiqqûṣ šōmēm) designates an idolatrous object that causes spiritual and, eventually, national ruin. Typological and Prophetic Extension Jesus applies the phrase to a yet-future event (Matthew 24:15-16; Mark 13:14), indicating that Antiochus’s forces prefigure the eschatological forces of the final Antichrist. Revelation 13 depicts a ruler who likewise commands “an image” to be set up (v. 14-15) and uses armed authority to compel worship. Thus, Daniel 11:31 is both a historical anchor and a predictive paradigm. Theological Significance 1. Sovereignty: God allows hostile “forces” as instruments of judgment (cf. Habakkuk 1:6). 2. Covenant Testing: Their oppression exposes true allegiance—flattery draws the faithless, yet “the people who know their God will firmly resist” (Daniel 11:32). 3. Hope of Vindication: The limited success of the forces testifies to the temporality of evil kingdoms and anticipates Messiah’s everlasting dominion (Daniel 7:13-14). Archaeological Corroboration • Coins minted by Antiochus from 175-164 BC depict Zeus enthroned, aligning with the temple desecration. • Excavations on the Ophel (Jerusalem) uncovered evidence of Hellenistic military occupation layers, including Greek sling bullets and stamped Rhodian amphora handles from the mid-2nd century BC, consistent with an occupying force. Practical Application for Believers Today The account warns that state power can be weaponized against true worship. Believers must discern when governmental “forces” overstep by requiring idolatry or suppressing biblical practice. The historical outcome encourages steadfastness: God ultimately removes the profane army and restores pure worship. Summary The “forces” in Daniel 11:31 are the king’s armed agents who invade the sanctuary, halt Mosaic sacrifice, and install an idolatrous altar. Historically embodied in Antiochus IV’s troops, they foreshadow the militarized power of the final Antichrist. Their limited tenure underlines God’s sovereign control and the assurance of deliverance for those loyal to the covenant. |
    |