Romans 16:6: Women's role in early Church?
How does Romans 16:6 reflect the role of women in the early Christian community?

Full Text

“Greet Mary, who has worked very hard for you.” — Romans 16:6


Immediate Literary Context

Romans 16 is a list of twenty-six named believers whom Paul commends. The list is carefully balanced between men and women (at least nine women), slaves and freedpersons, Jews and Gentiles, house-church leaders and traveling missionaries. The inclusion of Mary in v. 6, sandwiched between Prisca and Aquila (v. 3) and Andronicus and Junia (v. 7), shows that Paul sees her labor as comparable in spiritual value to that of the better-known missionary couples.


Identity of “Mary” (Maria)

The name was common among Palestinian Jews and Diaspora communities. Nothing in the text demands she be Mary Magdalene or any Mary of the Gospels. The most likely scenario is that she is a Jewish Christian then living in Rome (supported by the Semitic name and the pattern of Paul greeting several Jewish believers: vv. 7, 11). Her anonymity underscores that commendation in the early Church was based on service, not celebrity.


“Worked Very Hard” — Greek Exegesis

The phrase “has worked very hard” translates ἥτις πολλὰ ἐκοπίασεν (hētis polla ekopiasen).

• ἐκοπίασεν (kopiaō) denotes strenuous toil to the point of exhaustion (cf. 1 Corinthians 15:10; Galatians 4:11).

• πολλὰ (polla) intensifies the extent—“much, greatly.”

Paul employs the same verb for his own apostolic effort (Colossians 1:29) and for elders who “labor in preaching and teaching” (1 Timothy 5:17). By using identical vocabulary, he levels the field of honor: female service can be every bit as sacrificial and God-honoring as male apostolic labor.


Comparison with Other Commended Women in Romans 16

• Phoebe (v. 1) — called a “διάκονος of the church in Cenchrea” and likely the courier of the epistle.

• Prisca (v. 3) — a tent-maker, house-church host, and co-teacher with her husband Aquila (Acts 18).

• Junia (v. 7) — “well known among the apostles.”

• Tryphena, Tryphosa, Persis (v. 12) — also praised for “working hard in the Lord.”

Together they form a data set that demonstrates women were integral to evangelism, discipleship, hospitality, and charitable relief.


Cultural Backdrop and Counter-Cultural Elevation

Greco-Roman society limited public religious leadership to men; Jewish synagogue roles were likewise male-dominated (cf. Josephus, Against Apion 2.201). Yet Paul publicly acknowledges female labor, circulating his letter in mixed congregations. This bestows status unheard-of in either surrounding culture. Early non-Christian testimony corroborates this: Pliny the Younger’s letter to Trajan (ca. A.D. 111) mentions interrogating “two female slaves who were called deaconesses” (Ephesians 10.96).


Roles Noted Elsewhere in the New Testament

• Prophetesses: Philip’s four daughters (Acts 21:9).

• House-church hosts: Lydia in Philippi (Acts 16:15, 40); Nympha in Laodicea (Colossians 4:15).

• Prayer and intercession: Mary, mother of John Mark, opens her home for a prayer meeting (Acts 12:12).

• Evangelistic testimony: Samaritan woman (John 4), the women at the empty tomb (Matthew 28:8-10).


Complementary yet Ordered Ministry

Paul’s commendation of Mary coexists with his instructions on congregational order (1 Corinthians 14:34-35; 1 Timothy 2:12-13). The two strands are harmonious: distinctive leadership offices are limited to qualified males (1 Timothy 3:1-7; Titus 1:5-9), while the sphere of recognized service is open to all. Mary’s example shows that “labor in the Lord” is not contingent on holding an office; it is measured by faithfulness and sacrifice.


Archaeological Corroboration

• Catacomb Inscriptions: Numerous epitaphs in the Catacomb of Priscilla (2nd-3rd c.) record women identified as “matrona,” “virgo,” or “minister,” demonstrating recognized female service.

• Dura-Europos (A.D. 235): The house-church’s baptistry artwork preserves scenes of women at the empty tomb, reinforcing the early Church’s remembrance of female witness and ministry.


Historical Echoes in Patristic Writings

• Clement of Rome (1 Clem. 55) praises “worthy women” who “strengthened others’ faith.”

• Polycarp (Philippians 4.3) urges his readers to emulate the “faithful widows” who labored in prayer and good works.

These parallels indicate that the pattern visible in Romans 16 endured beyond the apostolic era.


Practical and Pastoral Implications

1. Recognition: Local churches should publicly honor faithful women whose unseen labor sustains the body.

2. Opportunity: Gift-based ministry aligns with the Spirit’s distribution, not with cultural stereotypes (1 Corinthians 12:7-11).

3. Guardrails: While Scripture reserves the teaching-elder office for men, all believers—men and women—are urged to abound in the “work of the Lord” (1 Corinthians 15:58).

4. Encouragement: Mary’s anonymity frees today’s servants from the craving for spotlight. God notices.


Conclusion

Romans 16:6 is a window into the early Church’s valuing of female disciples. Paul’s single-line greeting embodies an ethos that marries doctrinal fidelity with radical honor: women labored strenuously for the gospel, and the apostolic Church was neither hesitant nor embarrassed to say so. In every era the verse calls the Church to celebrate such labor, uphold biblical order, and remember that in Christ, “the parts of the body that seem to be weaker are indispensable” (1 Corinthians 12:22).

Why does Paul specifically commend Mary in Romans 16:6 for her hard work?
Top of Page
Top of Page