Why is the empty tomb significant in Matthew 28:6? Matthew 28:6—Exact Text and Narrative Setting “He is not here; He has risen, just as He said. Come, see the place where He lay.” The declaration is made by the angel to Mary Magdalene and “the other Mary” at the garden tomb just after dawn on the first day of the week (Matthew 28:1-5). The angel’s three-part proclamation—absence, resurrection, invitation—drives every subsequent theme. Immediate Literary Emphasis • “He is not here” affirms bodily absence, not mere spiritual survival. • “Has risen” translates the perfect passive ἠγέρθη, emphasizing a completed act with continuing results carried out by the Father’s power (cf. Romans 6:4). • “Just as He said” anchors the event in Jesus’ repeated predictions (Matthew 12:40; 16:21; 20:18-19), underscoring prophetic fulfillment and divine reliability. • “Come, see” provides empirical invitation; eyewitness verification is encouraged, not suppressed (cf. 1 John 1:1-3). Historical Reliability of the Empty Tomb a. Early, independent attestation: Matthew, Mark 16:6, Luke 24:6, John 20, and the pre-Pauline creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3-5 (dated within five years of the event) converge on bodily resurrection and an empty tomb. b. Criterion of embarrassment: First witnesses are women—socially low-ranked and legally restricted as witnesses in first-century Judaism—bolstering authenticity. c. Enemy acknowledgment: Matthew records the chief priests’ bribery of guards to spread the theft story (Matthew 28:11-15), implying the tomb was, in fact, empty. d. Public location: Jesus was buried in Joseph of Arimathea’s known, rock-hewn family tomb; no rival tomb tradition emerged. e. Early preaching in Jerusalem: Proclamation of resurrection flourished in the city where validation or refutation was easiest (Acts 2–4). Archaeological and Extrabiblical Corroboration • First-century rolling-stone tombs around Jerusalem (e.g., Tomb 15 in the Second Temple necropolis) match the Gospel descriptions. • The Nazareth Inscription (mid-1st century imperial edict against grave robbing) reflects Roman concern over claims of bodies “being taken” from Jewish tombs. • The crucified man Yehohanan’s ankle spiked with an iron nail (Giv’at ha-Mivtar, 1968) corroborates Roman crucifixion practices consistent with the Gospel Passion accounts. • Ossuaries bearing names of contemporaries (e.g., Caiaphas, 1990 find) affirm the historical backdrop of the Sanhedrin protagonists. • Early patristic citations—Ignatius (A.D. 107, Smyrn. 1-2) and Justin Martyr (Dial. 108)—assume an empty tomb and bodily resurrection as public knowledge. Fulfillment of Scriptural Prophecy Psalm 16:10: “For You will not abandon my soul to Sheol, nor will You let Your Holy One see decay.” (cf. Acts 2:27). Isaiah 53:10-11 speaks of the Servant “seeing His offspring” after making his soul an offering. Jonah 1:17 becomes the typological “sign of Jonah” (Matthew 12:40). Jesus’ predictions: Matthew 17:23; 26:32; John 2:19-22. Theological Significance • Vindication of Christ’s deity and messiahship (Romans 1:4). • Confirmation of substitutionary atonement; payment accepted (Hebrews 10:12-14). • Firstfruits pledge of believers’ future bodily resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:20-23). • Inauguration of new-creation order (2 Corinthians 5:17; Colossians 1:18). • Demonstration of Christ’s authority over all creation, aligning with intelligent design claims that the universe is contingent on the Logos (John 1:3; Colossians 1:16-17). Practical and Ecclesial Ramifications • Lord’s-day worship: Pattern moved from Sabbath to Sunday because that is “the first day of the week” when the tomb was found empty (Acts 20:7; Revelation 1:10). • Baptism depicts burial and resurrection with Christ (Romans 6:3-5). • Communion proclaims the Lord’s death “until He comes” (1 Corinthians 11:26), predicated on a living Lord. Miraculous Continuity Modern medically documented healings (e.g., Lourdes Medical Bureau files; reports in the peer-reviewed Southern Medical Journal 1984, 2011) testify that the same resurrection power still intervenes, consistent with Mark 16:20’s claim of confirming signs. Cosmological Coherence Resurrection power validates theism and undermines materialistic closure. If the dead can be raised, the Creator can also superintend origins. Observed fine-tuning (e.g., physicist Luke Barnes, 2020) and information-rich DNA echo the Logos logic (John 1:1-4). A young-world timeline harmonizes with genealogical chronologies (Genesis 5; 11; Luke 3) and catastrophic Flood geology (e.g., polystrate fossils in Carboniferous coal seams, Grand Canyon sediment megasequences), all pointing to divine intervention rather than unguided processes. Pastoral Assurance The empty tomb guarantees hope amid suffering (1 Thessalonians 4:13-14). It anchors ethical living: “Therefore… be steadfast, immovable, always excelling in the work of the Lord, knowing that your labor in the Lord is not in vain.” (1 Corinthians 15:58) Summary Statement The empty tomb in Matthew 28:6 is the linchpin of Christian faith, a historically credible, prophetically fulfilled, theologically rich, experientially transformative fact that authenticates Jesus as Lord, secures salvation, inaugurates new creation, and summons every person to repentance and faith. |
    |