What are the high places mentioned in 1 Kings 15:14? Definition and Terminology The phrase “high places” translates the Hebrew בָּמוֹת (bāmôṯ; singular, bāmāh). In the Ancient Near East this word denoted an elevated or prominent site—whether a natural hill, man-made platform, or walled terrace—used for religious rites. While elevation often aided visibility and symbolism, “high place” could also describe ground-level precincts inside cities (e.g., the “high place that was in the gate of Joshua” in 2 Kings 23:8). A bāmāh typically featured an altar, standing stones (maṣṣēbôt), carved or planted poles (’ăšērîm), and sometimes small sanctuaries or “houses of the high places” (1 Kings 12:31). Biblical References and Immediate Context 1 Kings 15:14 : “The high places were not removed, but Asa’s heart was fully devoted to the LORD all his days.” The parallel text, 2 Chronicles 15:17, repeats the note. Throughout Kings and Chronicles the narrator uses high places as a spiritual barometer: faithful kings are commended for removing them; compromising kings are rebuked for tolerating or building them (e.g., Solomon, Jeroboam I, Jehoram, Ahaz). Historical Background of High Places in Canaan Before Israel entered Canaan, hilltop shrines were standard fixtures of Canaanite religion. Ugaritic tablets (Ras Shamra, 14th–13th c. BC) refer to sacrifices and cultic meals on “summits” dedicated to Baal and Anat. Yahweh’s instructions to Israel were unequivocal: Deuteronomy 12:2-3 : “You must utterly destroy all the places where the nations you dispossess worshipped their gods—on the high mountains, on the hills, and under every green tree. Tear down their altars…” Centralization of worship at the chosen place (first Shiloh, later Jerusalem) was meant to preserve doctrinal purity and covenant unity (Deuteronomy 12:13-14). Religious Function and Activities 1. Burnt offerings and peace offerings (1 Kings 3:2-4). 2. Incense burning (2 Kings 16:4). 3. Votive and agricultural festivals. 4. Oracular consultation (2 Kings 23:24 hints at mediums associated with bāmâ practice). While some high-place worshipers claimed loyalty to Yahweh (e.g., Samuel at Ramah before the temple stood, 1 Samuel 9:11-25), once the temple was built God regarded any competing shrine as illicit (1 Kings 9:3-9). Development across Israel’s Monarchy • Solomon: built lawful temple in Jerusalem but also erected high places for Chemosh and Molech (1 Kings 11:7). • Jeroboam I: established royal shrines at Dan and Bethel with golden calves (1 Kings 12:28-33). Tel Dan’s monumental podium, altar, and cult objects (10th c. BC) correlate with this narrative. • Asa: purged images and deposed the queen mother for an Asherah image (1 Kings 15:12-13) yet left the people’s high places standing (15:14). • Hezekiah: “removed the high places, smashed the pillars” (2 Kings 18:4). Lachish reliefs and the dismantled four-horned altar from Beersheba (reassembled by archaeologists) reflect such reforms. • Josiah: launched the most sweeping purge (2 Kings 23). Archaeological evidence at Arad shows his likely closure of the fortress shrine (two standing stones were buried and the incense altars dismantled). High Places during King Asa’s Reign Asa (911–870 BC) trusted Yahweh, expelled male cult prostitutes, and renewed the covenant (2 Chron 15). Nevertheless, “the high places were not removed.” Possible reasons: 1. Popular pressure—grass-roots shrines served local communities. 2. Political calculus—destroying every bāmāh required military force Asa lacked amid wars with Baasha (1 Kings 15:16). 3. Incomplete understanding—Asa may have distinguished between blatantly idolatrous sites (which he targeted) and ostensibly Yahwistic ones (temporarily tolerated). Archaeological Corroboration • Tel Dan: a massive stone platform (c. 48 × 18 m) and a large altar base align with Jeroboam’s “great high place” (1 Kings 12:31). • Megiddo: Level IV altar and tripartite shrine (Early Iron II) illustrate multi-room high-place architecture. • Beersheba: disassembled four-horned altar stones (Iron II) reused in later structures, indicating deliberate dismantlement—consistent with Hezekiah or Josiah’s reforms. • Tel Arad: twin standing stones and incense altars discovered in the Judahite fortress shrine; buried in stratified debris, matching Josiah’s purge. These finds reinforce the biblical pattern: proliferation, periodic toleration, and dramatic waves of destruction. Theological Significance 1. Exclusivity of Worship: Yahweh alone chooses the means, mediator, and place of meeting. Unauthorized worship—even if directed nominally to Him—is disobedience (Leviticus 10:1-3; Deuteronomy 12). 2. “Heart” versus Practice: Scripture commends Asa’s heart yet records his failure to complete reform, spotlighting the tension between personal devotion and systemic obedience. 3. Progressive Revelation: The move from tabernacle to temple foreshadows Christ, the ultimate meeting place between God and man (John 2:19-21). High places symbolize rival claims that the gospel answers once for all at the cross—history’s climactic “high place” (Luke 23:33). Messianic Foreshadowing The prophets envisioned an eschatological reversal: elevated geography becomes a metaphor for the preeminence of God’s appointed site and Person. Isaiah 2:2 : “In the last days, the mountain of the house of the LORD will be established as the chief of the mountains.” This “mountain” is realized in Christ, who declared, “a time is coming when you will worship the Father neither on this mountain nor in Jerusalem… true worshipers will worship in spirit and truth” (John 4:21-24). Practical Application for Believers Modern “high places” surface as self-designed spirituality, selective obedience, or syncretistic blends of biblical language with secular ideologies. The call remains: “Little children, keep yourselves from idols” (1 John 5:21). Genuine devotion requires dismantling every rival altar of the heart, submitting to the Lordship of Christ, and gathering with His people as Scripture prescribes (Hebrews 10:25). Key Cross-References Deut 12:2-14; Joshua 22; 1 Samuel 9:12-25; 1 Kings 3:2; 11:7-10; 12:28-33; 14:23; 2 Kings 17:9-11; 18:4; 22–23; 2 Chron 14–16; Psalm 78:58; Jeremiah 7:31; Hosea 10:8. Summary The “high places” of 1 Kings 15:14 were locally beloved but divinely forbidden shrines whose presence revealed Israel’s chronic temptation to syncretism. King Asa’s incomplete purge is a cautionary tale: wholehearted devotion must translate into comprehensive obedience. Archaeology substantiates Scripture’s portrait of these sites; theology clarifies their danger; and the gospel proclaims the ultimate, once-for-all sacrifice that renders every other altar obsolete. |
    |