What is the meaning of 1 Kings 16:20? As for the rest of the acts of Zimri • This opening clause signals that Zimri’s brief reign (1 Kings 16:15–19) contained more events than the writer details here. • Scripture often gives a concise overview of a king’s life, then points the reader to further records (compare 1 Kings 14:19; 15:31). • Zimri’s story illustrates how swiftly a life rooted in rebellion can rise and fall. In just seven days he moved from palace coup to fiery death, mirroring Proverbs 10:27, which observes that “the years of the wicked are cut short.” • God’s Word treats even the wicked rulers of Israel as real historical figures; their deeds are recorded because they matter to the divine storyline (cf. 2 Kings 15:14–15). and the treason he committed • The writer highlights Zimri’s defining act: assassinating King Elah and slaughtering the royal family (1 Kings 16:9–12). • Treason is presented not merely as a political crime but as moral offense against God-ordained authority (Romans 13:1–2). • Other coups—such as Jehu’s against Jehoram (2 Kings 9:14–26) or Pekah’s against Pekahiah (2 Kings 15:25)—echo Zimri’s sin and its consequences, underscoring that “those who live by the sword will die by the sword” (Matthew 26:52). • Zimri’s treason shows how unchecked ambition destroys both perpetrator and people, fulfilling Hosea 8:7, “For they sow the wind, and they reap the whirlwind.” are they not written in the Book of the Chronicles of the Kings of Israel? • This rhetorical formula points to an official royal archive, now lost, that validated the inspired writer’s account (1 Kings 22:39; 2 Kings 1:18). • By directing readers to that source, the text affirms its own historical reliability while keeping the focus on God’s evaluative verdict rather than exhaustive detail. • The statement also hints at divine record-keeping: every deed is noted, whether or not humans still possess the documents (Malachi 3:16; Revelation 20:12). • The mention of an external chronicle underscores that God works within real history, inviting trust in both His providence and the accuracy of the biblical narrative. summary 1 Kings 16:20 is more than a passing editorial note. It reminds readers that Zimri’s short, violent reign had additional details, all faithfully chronicled. His defining treason stands as a cautionary tale against rebellion and bloodshed, while the reference to the royal archives underscores Scripture’s dependability and God’s thorough accounting of human actions. |
    |