What does 2 Chronicles 28:3 mean?
What is the meaning of 2 Chronicles 28:3?

Moreover, Ahaz burned incense in the Valley of Ben-hinnom

• Burning incense was an act of worship. In Ahaz’s case, it was directed toward false gods (2 Kings 16:3–4).

• The Valley of Ben-hinnom (later called Gehenna) had become a center of idolatrous rituals (Jeremiah 7:31). By choosing this location, Ahaz openly rejected the ordained worship God had set in Jerusalem (2 Chron 6:6).

• The king’s behavior signaled more than personal rebellion; it led the nation astray (2 Chron 28:19), showing how leadership can influence a people either toward or away from God (Proverbs 29:2).

• This setting foreshadows judgment imagery; Jesus later alludes to Gehenna when describing eternal punishment (Matthew 10:28), underscoring how detestable these practices were to the Lord.


and sacrificed his sons in the fire

• The phrase is literal: Ahaz burned his own children as offerings (2 Kings 17:17).

• God had explicitly forbidden this horror:

– “You must not give any of your children to be sacrificed to Molech” (Leviticus 18:21).

– “Do not imitate their detestable ways… even their sons and daughters they burn in the fire” (Deuteronomy 12:30-31).

• Child sacrifice epitomized the depth of Judah’s apostasy. It inverted God’s design for family—parents should protect life, not destroy it (Genesis 9:6; Psalm 127:3-5).

• By violating the most basic moral law, Ahaz invited divine discipline. The chapter records immediate consequences: defeats by Aram and Israel (2 Chron 28:5-6) and later Assyrian domination (2 Chron 28:20).

• The New Testament reaffirms the sanctity of life and the seriousness of causing “little ones” to stumble (Matthew 18:6), highlighting the timelessness of God’s moral standards.


according to the abominations of the nations that the LORD had driven out before the Israelites

• God had expelled the Canaanite nations because of these very practices (Leviticus 18:24-25; Deuteronomy 18:9-12). Ahaz repeated what had once brought judgment upon them, proving that privilege does not exempt anyone from accountability.

• The term “abominations” underscores actions utterly repugnant to God (Proverbs 6:16-19). They defile both land and people (Numbers 35:33-34).

• By copying pagan customs, Judah forfeited covenant blessings (Deuteronomy 28:15-68). The pattern is clear:

– Imitation of the world leads to spiritual blindness (Romans 1:21-25).

– Spiritual compromise invites divine discipline (Hebrews 12:5-11).

• God’s prior warning—“Do not follow their statutes” (Leviticus 20:23)—shows His desire to protect His people from destructive sin. Ahaz’s choice displays the tragic outcome when leaders ignore that warning.


summary

2 Chronicles 28:3 records King Ahaz’s open embrace of pagan worship: offering incense in a notoriously idolatrous valley and literally burning his sons alive. Each act violated God’s clear commands and mirrored the vile customs that had led to the Canaanites’ expulsion. Ahaz’s behavior illustrates how quickly a nation can descend when it rejects God’s word, reminding us that idolatry, the devaluation of life, and conformity to a godless culture always invite God’s righteous judgment.

What historical evidence supports the events described in 2 Chronicles 28:2?
Top of Page
Top of Page