What is the meaning of Job 32:14? But – A pause and pivot, signaling Elihu’s entrance into the debate after the three older friends have fallen silent (Job 32:1–3). – The conjunction establishes contrast: Elihu acknowledges the previous discussion yet signals a different approach (Proverbs 18:17). Job has not directed his words against me – Elihu notes that Job’s complaints targeted God and the three friends, not him personally (Job 16:1–3; Job 19:2). – This statement grounds Elihu’s claim to impartiality: • He is not bruised by personal offense. • He can speak without the defensiveness the others displayed (Proverbs 15:28). – It shows the importance of listening first, then responding (James 1:19). I will not answer him – Elihu pledges restraint: he will reply, but not reactively or vindictively (Job 33:1–3). – He models measured speech—answering only what needs answering, leaving space for God’s ultimate response (Job 38:1). – His stance echoes the wisdom of soft answers that turn away wrath (Proverbs 15:1). with your arguments – Elihu distances himself from the friends’ flawed reasoning: • They equated suffering with personal sin (Job 4:7–8); Elihu rejects this oversimplification. • Their tone became accusatory and harsh (Job 8:2); Elihu aims for clarity and humility (1 Peter 3:15). – By refusing their line of attack, he underscores that truth must be spoken in love and accuracy, not in recycled platitudes (Ephesians 4:15). summary Elihu begins his discourse by contrasting himself with Job’s three friends. He has not been personally affronted, so he can respond without bias. He promises to speak carefully and refuses to reuse the friends’ accusatory logic. Job 32:14 therefore teaches the value of listening without taking offense, answering with measured words, and rejecting arguments that misrepresent God’s ways. |
    |