What does Matthew 27:7 mean?
What is the meaning of Matthew 27:7?

After conferring together

“After conferring together” (Matthew 27:7) shows that the chief priests and elders paused to deliberate after Judas flung the silver back at them.

• They were united in maintaining appearances of righteousness while plotting wrongdoing, echoing earlier secret councils (Matthew 26:3–4; John 11:47–53).

• Their collective decision highlights human responsibility even in God’s sovereign plan (Acts 4:27–28).


They used the money

“They used the money” underscores their choice about the thirty pieces of silver.

• Because it was “blood money,” they judged it “not lawful to put into the treasury” (Matthew 27:6 with Deuteronomy 23:18).

• Their scrupulous handling of coins contrasts with the grave injustice they had just committed, illustrating “straining out a gnat” while swallowing a camel (Matthew 23:24).


To buy the potter’s field

The coins purchased “the potter’s field.”

• A potter’s field was land depleted by clay digging—cheap, unusable for farming, near the Hinnom Valley where Jeremiah once shattered a pot to prophesy judgment (Jeremiah 19:1–13).

• The purchase fulfilled God’s prophetic script written centuries earlier: “So I took the thirty pieces of silver and threw them into the house of the LORD, to the potter” (Zechariah 11:12–13; cf. Matthew 27:9–10).

• From that day the site was called “Akeldama, that is, Field of Blood” (Acts 1:18–19), forever linking the land with both Judas’s betrayal and Christ’s redeeming blood.


As a burial place for foreigners

The field became “a burial place for foreigners.”

• Jerusalem drew many Gentile God-fearers and pilgrims who needed burial grounds (John 12:20). The leaders saw a practical civic use for tainted money.

• Unwittingly, they foreshadowed the gospel’s reach: the rejected Messiah would soon welcome “strangers and foreigners” into God’s household (Ephesians 2:12–19; Matthew 28:19).

• What was meant for ignoble disposal became provision for outsiders—an irony mirroring Joseph’s words, “You meant evil against me, but God meant it for good” (Genesis 50:20).


summary

Matthew 27:7 records a calculated but ironic decision: religious leaders, eager to stay ritually clean, used Judas’s blood money to buy a worn-out potter’s field for burying foreigners. Their act:

• exposes hypocrisy—meticulous about coins, indifferent to innocent blood;

• fulfills prophecy to the letter, proving Scripture’s accuracy and God’s sovereignty;

• hints at grace for outsiders, previewing the gospel’s global reach.

Even human treachery cannot derail God’s plan; instead, it becomes another stroke in His redemptive masterpiece centered on the cross of Christ.

How does Matthew 27:6 reflect on the morality of religious leaders?
Top of Page
Top of Page