What does "firstborn of death" mean?
What is the significance of "the firstborn of death" in Job 18:13?

Full Text

“It devours the parts of his skin; the firstborn of death devours his limbs.” — Job 18:13


Immediate Literary Setting

Bildad of Shuah is answering Job for the second time (Job 18). He paints a picture of the inevitable undoing of the wicked. Verse 13 sits at the climax of a cascading series of calamities (vv. 5–21) in which the sinner’s lamp is put out (v. 5), his strength is famished (v. 12), and finally an emissary called “the firstborn of death” consumes him (v. 13). The phrase is not hurled randomly; it is intended to be the ultimate terror in Bildad’s catalogue.


Ancient Near-Eastern Parallels

Ugaritic tablets (KTU 1.4, V:11-12) depict Mot, the god of death, consuming Baal “like a lamb,” showing death personified with appetite. Akkadian texts refer to a gallu-demon as death’s “eldest son” sent to drag victims to the underworld. Bildad’s language resonates with that milieu: death is a householder with offspring; his chief son is dispatched to dismantle the wicked.


Possible Identifications

1. Angel of DestructionExodus 12:23 speaks of “the Destroyer.” Psalm 78:49 mentions “a band of destroying angels.” Early Jewish commentators (e.g., Targum Job) equated the “firstborn of death” with that angelic being.

2. Violent Disease – Ancient Hebrew often associates skin decay with divine judgment (Leviticus 13). The phrase “devours the parts of his skin” and “limbs” hints at a wasting disease—possibly leprosy, gangrene, or necrotizing infection—regarded as death’s champion.

3. Abaddon / MotJob 26:6 mentions Abaddon (Destruction) as a region/personification. Revelation 9:11 later names “Abaddon” the angel of the abyss. The “firstborn” could be Abaddon, the premier power of death’s realm.

All three ideas converge: whether angelic, demonic, or pathological, the figure stands for death’s most lethal instrument.


Canonical Intertext

Psalm 49:14 “Like sheep they are appointed to Sheol; Death shall shepherd them.”

Isaiah 14:30 LXX uses “firstborn of the poor shall be slain with famine,” echoing Job’s syntax.

2 Kings 19:35 records one angel striking 185,000 Assyrians overnight—demonstrating a precedent for a single emissary of death.


Contrast with ‘Firstborn from the Dead’ (Christ)

Job, chronologically the earliest biblical book, presents the “firstborn of death.” Colossians 1:18 later unveils “the firstborn from the dead,” Jesus Christ, who conquers death by resurrection. Scripture thus frames two antithetical primogenitures:

• Firstborn of death → agent of destruction, emblem of judgment.

• Firstborn from death → agent of life, guarantor of salvation (1 Corinthians 15:20-22).

Only by the latter is the former ultimately defeated: “The last enemy to be destroyed is death” (1 Corinthians 15:26).


Theological Implications

1. God’s Sovereign Justice – Bildad misapplies truth to condemn innocent Job, yet correctly asserts that wickedness summons destructive forces under God’s governance (Job 1:12; 2:6).

2. Mortality’s Hierarchy – Death is not random chaos; Scripture pictures an ordered host under divine permission (Job 25:2; Psalm 103:20).

3. Escapelessness without Redemption – Human effort cannot evade this “firstborn.” Job longs for a mediator (Job 9:33). The New Testament reveals that Mediator (1 Timothy 2:5).


Pastoral Application

Fear of death’s firstborn is universal (Hebrews 2:15). The gospel offers liberation: “He, too, shared in their humanity so that by His death He might destroy the one who holds the power of death” (Hebrews 2:14). The believer is thus armed against Bildad-like despair.


Conclusion

“The firstborn of death” in Job 18:13 is a poetic title for death’s most potent emissary—whether understood as a destroying angel, terminal disease, or personified power. It epitomizes the inexorable fate of the unredeemed wicked. Yet Scripture’s progressive revelation sets this grim figure opposite Christ, the “firstborn from the dead,” whose victory nullifies death’s claim on those who trust Him.

How does Job 18:13 fit into the broader context of Bildad's speech?
Top of Page
Top of Page