What history shaped Ephesians 6:6?
What historical context influenced the writing of Ephesians 6:6?

Date and Authorship

Paul wrote Ephesians during his first Roman imprisonment, c. AD 60–62, under Nero’s early rule (cf. Acts 28:16,30). The epistle’s opening salutation names Paul as author (Ephesians 1:1), and the earliest external witness, Papyrus 46 (ca. AD 175), already attributes the letter to him. No patristic voice—Ignatius, Polycarp, Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, or Origen—questions Pauline authorship. This timing situates Ephesians 6:6 in the wider context of imperial Rome’s social order and the apostle’s own experience in chains (Ephesians 3:1; 4:1; 6:20).


Ephesus and the Roman Province of Asia

Ephesus, the provincial capital of Asia Minor, was a bustling port city famed for the Temple of Artemis (Acts 19:27–35). Inscriptions from the Prytaneion (city hall) and archaeological layers beneath the first-century agora reveal a diverse population: Greeks, Romans, Jews, and emancipated slaves who had formed trade guilds. Christianity had already disrupted local commerce tied to idolatry (Acts 19:23–41), so believers were conspicuous. This urban cosmopolitanism meant congregations contained masters and household slaves worshiping side by side (cf. 1 Corinthians 7:21–22).


The Institution of Slavery in the First-Century Roman World

An estimated one-third of the empire’s inhabitants were douloi (“bond-servants”). Roman law (e.g., the Lex Aelia Sentia, AD 4) allowed manumission yet also branded slaves as property. Slavery ranged from harsh mines to skilled household administration. Ephesians 6:5–9 addresses this reality, not endorsing slavery as moral ideal but transforming behavior within it by reorienting both slave and master to their heavenly kurios. “Slaves, obey your earthly masters…not only to win their favor when their eye is on you, but as slaves of Christ” (Ephesians 6:5–6).


Pauline Household Codes

Greek moralists (Aristotle, Politics 1.2, and later Stoics) and Roman writers (Seneca, De Beneficiis 3.18) produced “household codes” (Haustafeln) prescribing duties between husbands and wives, parents and children, owners and slaves. Paul adopts the literary form yet injects Christ-centered motivation. The clauses in Ephesians 5:22 – 6:9 are chiastically arranged, culminating in 6:6 where the internal motive (“doing the will of God from your soul”) subverts mere “eye-service.” Thus, Ephesians 6:6 emerges from an existing genre but radically redirects it toward divine rather than civic virtue.


Jewish Ethical Foundations

Paul, steeped in the Hebrew Scriptures, echoes Deuteronomy 10:12–13 and Psalm 40:8, where wholehearted obedience is “the delight” of the faithful. In the Greco-Roman world, slaves often obeyed under threat; Torah, however, required humane treatment (Exodus 21:2; Deuteronomy 23:15–16). By urging servant obedience “in sincerity of heart” (Ephesians 6:5), Paul fuses Jewish moral concern with a Christological motive, reflecting Isaiah’s Servant who delighted to do God’s will (Isaiah 42:1).


The Spiritual War Theme

Ephesians immediately shifts from household duties (6:1–9) to cosmic warfare (6:10–18). This juxtaposition frames ordinary labor as an arena of spiritual combat; hypocrisy (“eye-service”) belongs to the darkness, while sincere obedience aligns with God’s will. Roman military imagery—ubiquitous in a city hosting imperial cohorts—underscores the seriousness of inner motives.


Roman Legal and Social Expectations

Under Roman patronage systems, public honor depended on visible compliance. “People-pleasing” secured advancement. By contrast, Paul instructs slaves to serve “not by way of eye-service” (ὀφθαλμοδουλεία), a neologism he likely coined to critique superficiality endemic to patron-client culture. This counters the cultural pressure of cursus honorum—the scramble for recognition—and situates integrity before an omniscient God (Proverbs 15:3).


Comparative Epistles: Colossians and Philemon

Ephesians and Colossians share a nearly verbatim exhortation (Colossians 3:22), written the same time and dispatched with Tychicus (Ephesians 6:21; Colossians 4:7). Philemon, addressed to a slave owner of Colossae, embodies the principles of Ephesians 6:6: Onesimus is to return “no longer as a slave, but better than a slave, as a beloved brother” (Philemon 16). These companion letters confirm Paul’s integrated teaching across Asia Minor.


Archaeological Corroboration

Excavations (1904–present) at Terrace House 2 in Ephesus reveal wall graffiti by household servants addressing “Kyrios Iēsous,” evidencing Christian slaves within elite homes. Nearby inscriptions list freedmen who financed city works, illustrating how many believers navigated slavery-to-freedom transitions that Paul addresses.


Implications for Early Christian Communities

By grounding obedience in Christ rather than surveillance, Paul dignifies the slave’s conscience, giving eternal weight to menial labor. Simultaneously, 6:9 warns masters of their answerability to the same Lord, sowing seeds that eventually undermined slavery’s moral foundation—as witnessed in third-century church orders (Apostolic Constitutions 4.9) that urged manumission.


Application within First-Century Worship and Liturgy

Assemblies met in domestic settings where slaves executed logistical tasks (Romans 16:5). The public reading of Ephesians (Colossians 4:16) meant slaves heard 6:6 in the presence of their masters, reinforcing communal accountability. The liturgical confession “Jesus is Lord” (Romans 10:9) eclipsed “Caesar is lord,” re-mapping allegiance.


Conclusion

Ephesians 6:6 was forged in a milieu of Roman slavery, patronage, and public honor culture; shaped by Jewish ethical roots; delivered during Paul’s imprisonment; and safeguarded by an unbroken manuscript chain. Its directive—serve from the soul as to Christ—upended first-century social norms, locating true freedom in wholehearted obedience to the risen Lord.

How does Ephesians 6:6 challenge the concept of working for human approval?
Top of Page
Top of Page