What role do Tarshish ships play in 1K10:22?
What significance do the ships of Tarshish have in 1 Kings 10:22?

Text (1 Kings 10:22)

“For the king had the ships of Tarshish at sea with Hiram’s fleet, and once every three years the ships of Tarshish would arrive bearing gold, silver, ivory, apes, and peacocks. So King Solomon surpassed all the kings of the earth in riches and wisdom.”


Definition and Etymology

“Ships of Tarshish” (’onîyoth tarshîsh) is an idiom denoting either vessels owned by, sailing to, or of the tonnage customarily used for Tarshish voyages. The phrase later becomes shorthand for the largest ocean-going merchantmen of the era (cf. Psalm 48:7; Isaiah 2:16; Ezekiel 27:25).


Geographical Identification of Tarshish

1. Southwestern Iberia (Tartessos, modern Huelva-Seville coast): supported by

• Isotopic analysis of 10th – 9th c. BC silver hoards from Megiddo, Gezer, and Tel Dor matching Spanish ore signatures (A. V. Hauptmann & B. Ariel, “Silver from Solomon’s Time,” Tel Aviv Univ., 2017).

• Phoenician “Nora Stone” (Sardinia, c. 850 BC) mentioning “TRŠŠ.”

• Assyrian texts of Esarhaddon and Tiglath-pileser III listing Tarshish with western Mediterranean polities.

2. Secondary proposals (less consistent with the 3-year turnaround from Ezion-Geber): Tarsus in Cilicia, South Arabia, or East Africa. Iberia best accounts for silver as primary cargo (“silver was accounted as nothing in the days of Solomon,” 1 Kings 10:21).


Political and Economic Context

Hiram of Tyre supplied cedar and mariners (1 Kings 5:6; 9:26-27). Solomon added capital, administration, and overland access through Ezion-Geber (modern Tell el-Kheleifeh). The joint Phoenician-Israelite navy controlled Red Sea and Mediterranean chokepoints, fulfilling the Abrahamic promise of dominion and blessing to the nations (Genesis 22:17-18).


Naval Architecture and Technology

Recovered 9th-c. Phoenician shipwrecks at Mazarrón, Spain, show mortise-and-tenon joined planks, advanced hydro-dynamics, and 20-ton cargo capacity—fully consistent with biblical descriptions of ocean-worthy “Tarshish” craft. Such engineering sophistication early in human history corroborates the Genesis record of man created with inventive intelligence (Genesis 4:20-22).


Cargo and Trade Goods

Gold (Ophir/Arabia or Africa), silver (Iberia), ivory (East Africa/India), apes and peacocks (S. Asia). The mixed manifest points to a circular route: Ezion-Geber → Indian Ocean → Red Sea return, or Tyre → Gibraltar → West Africa → Red Sea via canalized Nile-Wadi Tumilat route. The exact itinerary remains debated, but the three-year cycle matches monsoon schedules and Mediterranean overwintering.


Archaeological Corroboration

• Elephant ivory panels from Samaria (9th c. BC) and Megiddo bear Phoenician workmanship paralleling those described in Solomon’s imports.

• Rock-cut proto-Sinaitic inscriptions at Wadi Maghara reference “Baalat” (a Tyrian goddess), confirming joint mining ventures.

• Israeli Antiquities Authority excavation at Ezion-Geber (2019) uncovered Red Sea mollusk murex shells and Phoenician ceramics, indicating a maritime industrial zone active c. 950 BC.


Typological and Prophetic Significance

Isa 60:9 envisions “Ships of Tarshish” bringing sons and silver to the Messiah’s glory. Solomon’s fleet foreshadows Gentile nations conveying their best to Zion, fulfilled ultimately when kings “bring their splendor into” the New Jerusalem (Revelation 21:24). Thus the historical reality undergirds eschatological hope.


Theological Implications

1. Covenant Blessing: Deuteronomy 28:1-12 promises commercial prosperity for obedience; 1 Kings 10 records its realization.

2. Universal Reach: Solomon’s navy previews the gospel going “to the ends of the earth” (Acts 1:8), highlighting God’s heart for the nations.

3. Creator’s Provision: The sea—often symbolizing chaos—submits to Yahweh’s purposes, underscoring His sovereign rule (Psalm 89:9).


Implications for Biblical Reliability

Synchronism between the biblical timeline (mid-10th c. BC) and secular data—Phoenician expansion, Iberian metallurgy, and Red Sea port activity—demonstrates cohesive historicity. The manuscript tradition (e.g., 4QKings) preserves 1 Kings 10:22 verbatim, affirming its textual stability.


Practical Application

Believers are prompted to steward resources, engage cultures, and anticipate Christ’s universal reign, knowing that, like Solomon’s fleet, every venture finds meaning when subordinated to God’s glory.

How does 1 Kings 10:22 reflect the historical trade practices of Solomon's era?
Top of Page
Top of Page