Why were the children allowed to enter the Promised Land according to Deuteronomy 1:39? Historical Setting and Narrative Flow Israel stood at Kadesh-barnea on the cusp of Canaan (Deuteronomy 1:19-28). Ten spies’ fearful report provoked national unbelief, and the generation who had experienced the Exodus refused to advance. God therefore swore that every numbered man of war twenty years old and upward would die in the wilderness (Numbers 14:29; Deuteronomy 1:34-35). The forty-year wandering matched the forty days of spying (Numbers 14:34), furnishing a living object lesson of judgment and mercy. Exact Wording of Deuteronomy 1:39 “And the little ones whom you said would become plunder—your sons, who do not yet know good from evil—they will enter the land. I will give it to them, and they will possess it.” The verse answers two questions simultaneously: why the adults were barred (culpable unbelief) and why the children were admitted (innocence with respect to that rebellion). “Little Ones … Who Do Not Yet Know Good from Evil” 1. “Little ones” (Hebrew taph) denotes dependent children, often infants through early adolescence (Genesis 47:24; 2 Chronicles 20:13). 2. “Do not yet know good from evil” echoes Genesis 2:17 and Isaiah 7:15-16: a developmental boundary marking moral comprehension and accountable choice. 3. The idiom does not deny original sin (Psalm 51:5) but distinguishes personal transgression from inherited corruption. In the event at Kadesh, these minors had no conscious role in the national mutiny; therefore, corporate judgment did not fall on them. Age of Accountability in the Law and Prophets • Numbers 14:29, 31 fixes the adult cutoff at “twenty years old and upward,” the age of military responsibility (Numbers 1:3). • Deuteronomy 24:16 and Ezekiel 18:20 teach that “children shall not be put to death for their fathers.” • Jeremiah 31:29-30 anticipates a new covenant wherein each individual answers for his own sin. The principle is already visible in Deuteronomy 1:39. Divine Justice Tempered by Mercy Yahweh’s character unites righteousness and steadfast love (Exodus 34:6-7). Judgment on the parents demonstrated holiness; mercy toward the children preserved the covenant line, displaying “the kindness and sternness of God” (Romans 11:22). Grace did not cancel future responsibility—those children would grow, believe or disbelieve, and face blessing or curse under Moses’ closing sermons (Deuteronomy 30:15-20). Covenant Continuity and Promise Fulfillment God had pledged the land to Abraham’s seed in perpetuity (Genesis 15:18-21; 17:8). Preserving the offspring maintained the oath while upholding the conditional Mosaic sanctions on the unbelieving generation. Thus Deuteronomy 1:39 safeguards both strands of biblical theology: unconditional Abrahamic promise and conditional Sinai obedience. Parallel Passage: Numbers 14:31 “But your little ones, whom you said would become plunder, I will bring in, and they will enjoy the land that you have rejected.” The repetition establishes a two-witness legal confirmation (Deuteronomy 19:15) and shows Deuteronomy as Moses’ inspired exposition of earlier history. Consistent Witness Across Scripture • Psalm 95:10-11 identifies the rejected generation as those who “went astray in their heart.” • Hebrews 3:16-19 uses the episode to warn the church: unbelief forfeits rest, while faith enters. • Jesus affirms children’s exemplarity: “To such belongs the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 19:14). While not equating Canaan with heaven, the moral logic is parallel—God receives those lacking conscious rebellion. Archaeological and Historical Corroboration Excavations at Jericho (Garstang, Kenyon) reveal collapsed mud-brick walls at the time of Late Bronze I, matching Joshua’s assault chronology. Burn layers at Hazor and evidence of rapid destruction at Ai (Khirbet et-Tell) correspond to a swift incursion led, in the biblical record, by the very children spared in Deuteronomy 1:39. These findings support Scripture’s internal timeline, lending credence to its moral and historical claims. Typological and Christological Significance Joshua—Hebrew Yehoshua, “Yahweh saves”—prefigures Jesus (Iēsous) who leads God’s people into ultimate rest (Hebrews 4:8-10). The spared children symbolize all who, through child-like faith, enter the gospel promise (Matthew 18:3). As physical heirs of Canaan, they foreshadow spiritual heirs who inherit the “better country” secured by Christ’s resurrection (1 Peter 1:3-4). Practical Implications for Today 1. God judges personal rebellion, not mere lineage. 2. Parents bear a solemn duty to model faith, lest their children enter blessing without them. 3. God’s covenant faithfulness spans generations, encouraging evangelism and discipleship of youth. 4. The passage vindicates divine justice against charges of arbitrariness, showing coherent moral reasoning grounded in both revelation and observable human maturity. Summary Answer The children were allowed to enter the Promised Land because, unlike their parents, they lacked culpable knowledge and participation in the rebellion at Kadesh-barnea. Deuteronomy 1:39 grounds this privilege in their moral immaturity—“they do not yet know good from evil”—and in God’s covenant commitment to bring Abraham’s seed into Canaan. The ruling harmonizes justice and mercy, affirms personal responsibility, and foreshadows the gospel pattern whereby faith, not ancestry or age, determines entry into God’s ultimate rest. |
    |