Why couldn't the Israelites drive out the Jebusites from Jerusalem in Joshua 15:63? Geographical and Tactical Challenges Jerusalem (then “Jebus”) sat atop a narrow ridge flanked by the Kidron and Tyropoeon valleys. The city’s eastern slope fell 125 m to the Gihon Spring—the only permanent water source in the region—while sheer limestone scarps guarded the west. Bronze-Age fortification walls (unearthed in the “City of David” excavations, Area G) averaged 8 m thick. Archaeologist Eilat Mazar’s team has documented the “Stepped Stone Structure” and “Large Stone Structure,” confirming a formidable citadel that easily repelled infantry assaults lacking siege engines. (See also Warren’s Shaft, the concealed water tunnel exploited only later by David’s men, 2 Samuel 5:8.) Incomplete Obedience and Faith Deficiency The primary barrier was not masonry but unbelief. Moses had commanded total expulsion of Canaanite nations (Deuteronomy 7:1-2). Yet Judah faltered—exactly as forewarned (Numbers 33:55). Judges 1:19 notes that Judah prevailed “except they could not drive out the inhabitants of the valleys, because they had iron chariots.” Jerusalem’s defenders fielded comparable iron-reinforced weaponry, intimidating troops who had already relaxed after the southern and northern campaigns (Joshua 10–11). Scripture repeatedly ties military failure to half-hearted reliance on Yahweh (Joshua 17:12-18; Psalm 78:56-64). Historical Phasing within the Conquest The events of Joshua 15 occur late in the seven-year Conquest (ca. 1406–1399 BC, Ussher). Judah burned the lower town soon afterward (Judges 1:8), but the inner fortress on Mount Zion remained Jebusite for nearly four centuries until David (ca. 1003 BC). Thus “could not” in Joshua is a snapshot, not a permanent verdict; it anticipates eventual triumph under divinely chosen monarchy. Jebusite Military Capacity and Alliances Amarna letters (14th-cent. BC) from Abdi-Heba, Jebusite ruler of Urusalim, request Pharaoh’s aid against Habiru raiders; they reveal a professional garrison and Egyptian support. Combined with Hittite-style defensive ramparts (excavated glacis stones still visible), Jebus had strategic depth unknown to open-plain Canaanite cities earlier subdued (e.g., Lachish, which fell twice archaeologically—Levels VI and III). Divine Testing of Israel “The LORD left those nations to test Israel… to teach warfare to those who had not known it” (Judges 3:1-2). By allowing a Canaanite enclave in Judah’s heartland, God exposed latent compromise and called successive generations to renewed covenant fidelity (Joshua 24:14-27). The Jebusites thereby functioned as a living admonition. Prophetic Foreshadowing of Davidic Kingship and Messianic Stage Yahweh reserved Zion for His chosen king: “I have installed My King on Zion, My holy mountain.” (Psalm 2:6). David’s capture (2 Samuel 5) fulfilled that plan, and the Jebusite threshing floor later became the temple site (2 Samuel 24:18-25; 2 Chronicles 3:1). Christ, “the Son of David,” subsequently presented Himself in this same city, securing eternal victory through resurrection (Romans 1:4). The temporary Jebusite foothold thus magnified God’s sovereignty by spotlighting messianic culmination. Archaeological Corroboration 1. City of David excavations (Yigal Shiloh, 1978-1985; Eilat Mazar, 2005-2018) verify Late Bronze ramparts exactly where biblical Jebus stood. 2. The Middle Bronze water fortifications around the Gihon Spring align with 2 Samuel 5’s “water shaft.” 3. LMLK jar handles and ephah weights from Iron I strata confirm Judahite presence coexisting with non-Israelite pottery—material evidence of dual occupancy alluded to in Joshua 15:63. Spiritual Applications Unconquered strongholds, whether ancient citadels or modern sins, persist where faith and obedience lapse (2 Corinthians 10:4-5). Believers are warned to “put to death” remnants of the old life (Colossians 3:5). Yet God, in patience, turns partial victories into future testimonies of grace when hearts return to Him—just as Jerusalem moved from Judah’s shame to Judah’s crown. Chronological Harmony Joshua allocates territories c. 1400 BC; Judges documents intermittent setbacks over the next 300 years; David completes the task by 1003 BC. This harmonizes with Ussher’s Anno Mundi 2553–2993 chronology and with external Egyptian New Kingdom timelines (Amenhotep III’s Amarna archive). Anticipation of Final Conquest Earthly Jerusalem, once resistant, became the site of resurrection power. At Christ’s return the “New Jerusalem” (Revelation 21) will descend, forever eradicating every hostile enclave. Joshua’s incomplete conquest thus directs attention to the perfected conquest by Jesus—the greater Joshua—who secures eternal rest (Hebrews 4:8-10). |
    |