Why did Jonathan make a covenant with David despite Saul's intentions? Historical Setting and Narrative Flow Israel, ca. 1025 BC, is in political transition. Saul has been rejected (1 Samuel 15:28) while David has been anointed in secret (1 Samuel 16:13). Jonathan, first-born of Saul and legitimate heir, observes David’s meteoric rise (1 Samuel 18:5-16). Saul’s hostility escalates into attempted murder (1 Samuel 19:1-10; 20:30-33). The covenant of 1 Samuel 20:16 therefore forms under extreme tension: “So Jonathan made a covenant with the house of David, saying, ‘May the LORD call David’s enemies to account.’ ” Jonathan’s Spiritual Discernment Jonathan recognizes that Yahweh’s favor rests on David. He has witnessed: • David’s Spirit-empowered victory over Goliath (1 Samuel 17:45-47). • Repeated divine deliverances (1 Samuel 18:12-14). • The prophetic verdict delivered to Saul by Samuel (1 Samuel 13:14). Instead of resisting Yahweh’s decree, Jonathan aligns himself with it. Proverbs 19:21 notes, “Many plans are in a man’s heart, but the purpose of the LORD will prevail.” Jonathan exemplifies submission to that prevailing purpose. Covenant Theology in the Hebrew Bible “Covenant” (בְּרִית, berit) in Scripture denotes a binding relational pledge under divine witness. Covenants carry: 1. A pledge of loyalty. 2. Stipulations or responsibilities. 3. Sanctions or curses (cf. Genesis 15; Deuteronomy 27-30). Jonathan’s covenant (1 Samuel 18:3; 20:16-17, 42) includes all three elements: love-loyalty (hesed), explicit pledges (“show me kindness,” 20:14-15), and imprecation (“may the LORD call David’s enemies to account,” 20:16). Recognition of David’s Divine Anointing Jonathan’s actions are not political opportunism; they are theological obedience. He addresses David twice as the future king (1 Samuel 23:17). Under Mosaic law, righteousness requires submission to Yahweh-appointed authority (Deuteronomy 17:14-20). Jonathan’s covenant testifies that he values divine election above dynastic preservation. Faith over Filial Loyalty Near-Eastern custom demanded absolute allegiance to one’s father, yet Torah obedience superseded filial ties (Deuteronomy 13:6-8). Jonathan therefore chooses covenant fidelity with God’s anointed over biological loyalty, echoing Jesus’ later teaching (Luke 14:26). Hesed: Covenant Love Mirroring Yahweh In 1 Samuel 20:14, Jonathan pleads for “the LORD’s kindness” (hesed) from David. Hesed is a relational steadfast love rooted in God’s own character (Exodus 34:6). Jonathan lives out the principle that vertical love for God produces horizontal covenantal love for neighbor—even an erstwhile rival. Ancient Near Eastern Parallels Tablets from Mari (18th c. BC) and Hittite suzerain-vassal treaties show similar elements: mutual pledges, symbolic acts, invocation of deity to curse violators. Jonathan’s exchange of robe, armor, and weapons (1 Samuel 18:4) mirrors ceremony in a parity treaty, signaling permanent transference of status and allegiance. Oath-Keeping Ethics Ecclesiastes 5:4-5 warns not to defer payment of vows. Jonathan’s covenant stands as an ethical model: he keeps faith even unto death (1 Samuel 31:2). David likewise honors the oath by sparing Mephibosheth (2 Samuel 9), demonstrating that godly covenants outlive their makers. Intertextual Confirmation Scripture repeatedly references this covenant: • 1 Samuel 24:21-22—Saul himself acknowledges David’s coming kingdom and requests mercy on his house. • 2 Samuel 21:7—David refuses to hand over Jonathan’s son because of “the oath of the LORD.” These links display Scriptural coherence, reinforcing reliability. Christological Typology Jonathan’s relinquishing of royal claim anticipates the call to lay down status for Christ (Philippians 2:5-8). David, spared and enthroned, foreshadows the Greater David, Jesus, who receives everlasting covenant loyalty (Isaiah 55:3). The covenant language (“call David’s enemies to account”) echoes messianic judgment (Psalm 110:1). Answer Summarized Jonathan covenants with David because he discerns Yahweh’s election of David, prioritizes divine covenant fidelity over personal ambition or family loyalty, and embodies the hesed that reflects God’s own steadfast love. His action, anchored in Ancient Near Eastern covenantal practice and preserved in reliable manuscripts, serves prophetic, ethical, and Christological purposes, demonstrating that allegiance to God’s anointed is the pathway to blessing and the proper response of faith. |
    |