Why does Jesus criticize the Pharisees in Luke 11:42 for neglecting justice and love? Canonical Text “But woe to you Pharisees! You pay tithes of mint, rue, and every herb, yet you neglect justice and the love of God. You should have practiced the latter without neglecting the former.” (Luke 11:42) Historical-Religious Context: The Pharisaic Tithing of Herbs First-century rabbinic tradition, later codified in the Mishnah (Maʿaserot 1.1; Demai 2.1), urged meticulous tithing—even of garden greens so small they were exempt under Mosaic civil law (cf. Leviticus 27:30; Deuteronomy 14:22 – 23). Josephus (Antiquities 13.297) confirms that the Pharisees were famed for “minute observances.” By singling out “mint, rue, and every herb,” Jesus exposes their micro-precision in secondary matters while they sidestep the divine intention of Torah: covenantal faithfulness expressed in justice (Heb. mishpat) and love (Heb. ḥesed). Old Testament Foundations of Justice and Love Torah repeatedly anchors ritual to ethical concern: • “The LORD… defends the cause of the fatherless and the widow… therefore love the stranger” (Deuteronomy 10:18–19). • “You shall not pervert justice… you shall love your neighbor as yourself” (Leviticus 19:15, 18). God never intended tithing to replace these commands; it was to finance them (Numbers 18:24; Deuteronomy 14:28–29). Prophetic Continuity: Micah 6:8 & Amos 5 Micah distills covenant duty: “He has shown you, O man, what is good: to act justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God” (Micah 6:8). Amos thunders, “I despise your festivals… but let justice roll on like a river” (Amos 5:21, 24). Jesus stands in this prophetic stream, indicting ritual divorced from moral substance. Hypocrisy and Inversion of Priorities The Pharisees’ flaw is not tithing per se—Jesus says, “without neglecting the former”—but elevating lesser ordinances above weightier matters (cf. Matthew 23:23). This inversion fosters self-righteous comparison, blinding them to their own need for grace (Luke 18:9–14) and obstructing others from entering the kingdom (Luke 11:52). Parallel Synoptic Witness Matthew 23:23 echoes the same rebuke, establishing multiple attestation. Independent Lukan and Matthean traditions, recognized even by form-critical scholars, corroborate that the historical Jesus uttered this woe. Theological Implications: Heart-Oriented Righteousness God evaluates motives (1 Samuel 16:7). Tithing herbs is commendable when flowing from love; it becomes condemnable when used to sidestep mercy. The New Covenant promise is a heart of flesh engraved with God’s law (Jeremiah 31:33; Ezekiel 36:26). Jesus, the Lawgiver incarnate, demands consistency: precise obedience plus justice and love, not either-or. Practical and Ecclesial Application 1. Stewardship: Believers should give faithfully yet remember generosity’s aim—relief of the poor and advancement of the Gospel (Acts 4:34–35). 2. Social engagement: Churches must champion justice—defending unborn life, orphan care, fair treatment of workers—while proclaiming Christ crucified and risen. 3. Personal audit: Examine rituals (attendance, giving, service) for any hint they are compensating for neglected compassion or devotion. Conclusion Jesus criticizes the Pharisees because they transformed a covenant designed to reflect God’s righteous love into a scoreboard of minutiae. By neglecting justice and the love of God, they severed the very heart from the law they prized. True obedience integrates meticulous faithfulness with active, sacrificial love—manifested supremely in Christ, who fulfilled both justice and love on the cross and in the resurrection. |
    |