Why did God choose Moses despite his initial rejection by the Israelites in Acts 7:35? Immediate Context in Acts 7 Stephen rehearses Israel’s history to show a recurring pattern: God raises a deliverer; Israel initially spurns him; God vindicates His choice (Acts 7:9–10 with Joseph; 7:35–39 with Moses; 7:52 with Jesus). The Sanhedrin, by rejecting Christ, repeats the earlier refusal of Moses. Luke’s narrative spotlights divine election over human approval. Divine Sovereign Choice Yahweh’s prerogative governs leadership (Psalm 75:6-7; 1 Samuel 16:7). Moses did not volunteer; he was “chosen” (Hebrews 11:23-24). Election is independent of human esteem: “God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise” (1 Corinthians 1:27). The Israelites’ rejection highlights grace—God rescues even those who spurn His servant (cf. Romans 5:8). Forty-Year Midian Crucible Moses’ exile (Exodus 2:15-22) served four strategic aims: 1. Disentangle him from Egypt’s courtly pride (Acts 7:22 teaches he was already “mighty in speech and action”). 2. Foster humility (Numbers 12:3). 3. Acquaint him with wilderness geography vital for future leadership. 4. Provide time for covenant reflection; Midianites were descendants of Abraham (Genesis 25:1-2), linking Moses back to the patriarchal promises. The Rejected-Then-Vindicated Deliverer Pattern Joseph (Genesis 37:20; Acts 7:9), David (1 Samuel 24:14; Psalm 118:22), the Prophets (2 Chronicles 36:15-16), and supremely Jesus (John 1:11) share this pattern. God uses rejection to unveil deeper redemptive purposes and authenticate His messengers through subsequent exaltation. Demonstration of Power and Grace By selecting a scorned man, God ensures glory flows to Himself, not the instrument (Exodus 7:5). The ten plagues, Red Sea crossing, manna, and Sinai theophany displayed omnipotence and grace, proving both Moses’ legitimacy and Yahweh’s supremacy over Egypt’s gods (Exodus 12:12). Transformation of Character The rejection exposed Moses’ earlier self-reliance (Acts 7:23-25). At the bush he calls himself “slow of speech” (Exodus 4:10), signaling dependence. God values contrition (Isaiah 57:15). The leader Israel ultimately followed was not the prince of Egypt but the shepherd of Midian—a foreshadow of Christ, the Good Shepherd (John 10:11). Covenantal Continuity God’s selection of Moses fulfills Genesis 15:13-14 and 50:24-25, where Yahweh promised deliverance after four centuries. Moses becomes the mediator of a new covenant (Exodus 24:8), anticipating the “prophet like you” (Deuteronomy 18:15) ultimately realized in Jesus (Acts 3:22). Typology of Christ Parallels underscore divine intent: both spared from infant genocide (Exodus 1; Matthew 2), initial rejection (Exodus 2:14; John 19:15), forty-period testing (Exodus 24:18; Matthew 4:2), mountaintop transfiguration (Exodus 34; Matthew 17), intercessory roles (Exodus 32:32; Hebrews 7:25). Choosing Moses despite rejection thus foreshadows the gospel. Divine Authentication via Miraculous Sign Gifts Staff-to-serpent (Exodus 4:2-5), leprous hand (4:6-7), Nile to blood (4:9) pre-verified Moses to Israel’s elders (4:30-31). Subsequent miracles answered skepticism (14:31). New Testament miracles, capped by the resurrection, mirror this apologetic trajectory (John 20:30-31). A Call for Faith Response Israel’s initial disbelief (Exodus 6:9) stemmed from “cruel bondage,” yet God spoke again and again. Hebrews 3:7-19 exhorts later readers not to mimic that hard-heartedness. God’s selection of Moses underscores that faith, not majority opinion, aligns one with divine purpose. Archaeological and Textual Corroboration • The Merneptah Stele (c. 1210 BC) names “Israel” already in Canaan, corroborating an Exodus premised on earlier sojourn. • Sinai region inscriptions such as Proto-Sinaitic script show early alphabetic literacy, consistent with Mosaic authorship capability. • The Ketef Hinnom silver scrolls (7th century BC) preserve the priestly blessing (Numbers 6:24-26), evidencing textual stability. • Dead Sea Scroll copies of Exodus (4QExod-Levf) affirm remarkable consonantal fidelity to the Masoretic Text used in modern Bibles, supporting authenticity of Moses’ narrative. Philosophical and Behavioral Implications Selection despite rejection answers existential queries: significance is bestowed by Creator, not culture. Leadership emerges through divine vocation, not popularity polls—countering relativistic identity constructs and affirming objective purpose. Practical Application 1. Personal rejection need not nullify divine calling; patience under obscurity may precede public usefulness. 2. Measure leaders by faithfulness to God’s Word, not immediate popularity. 3. Invite skeptics to evaluate Christ as the climactic fulfillment of the Moses paradigm. Conclusion God chose Moses precisely so that His sovereignty, covenant fidelity, redemptive foreshadowing, and transforming power would shine all the brighter against human resistance. Acts 7:35 is less a riddle than a revelation: the God who overrides rejection in selecting Moses is the same God who, in Christ, offers salvation to any who will lay down their own skepticism and believe. |
    |