Why did King Josiah send officials to inquire of the LORD in 2 Kings 22:12? Canonical Setting and Textual Citation “Then the king commanded Hilkiah the priest, Ahikam son of Shaphan, Achbor son of Micaiah, Shaphan the scribe, and Asaiah the king’s attendant: ‘Go and inquire of the LORD for me, for the people, and for all Judah concerning the words of this book that has been found. For great is the wrath of the LORD that burns against us, because our fathers have not obeyed the words of this book by doing everything written about us.’” (2 Kings 22:12–13) Historical Context: Eighteenth Year of Josiah (c. 622 BC / 3374 AM) Josiah assumed the throne of Judah at age eight (2 Kings 22:1) and, unlike his grandfather Manasseh and father Amon, pursued covenant faithfulness. In his eighteenth regnal year, the repair of the temple (instituted c. 3366 AM) unearthed “the Book of the Law,” almost certainly a pristine copy of the Mosaic Torah. The discovery occurred amid sweeping Assyrian decline and before Babylon’s ascendency, providing a narrow window for sweeping reform. The Shock of Covenant Violation Reading Deuteronomy’s blessings and curses (especially Deuteronomy 27–30) exposed Judah’s chronic apostasy. Josiah’s spontaneous rending of garments (2 Kings 22:11) signaled grief, covenant-level contrition, and royal acknowledgment that national judgment was imminent. Mosaic law defined kingship as guardian of the Torah (Deuteronomy 17:18–20). Realizing he and his predecessors had failed that mandate, Josiah’s immediate response was to seek divine interpretation and remedial instruction. Mandated Precedent for Inquiry 1. Mosaic stipulation: leaders were to “inquire of the LORD” through priestly Urim (Numbers 27:21) or prophetic word (Deuteronomy 18:15–22). 2. Royal models: David (1 Samuel 23:2), Jehoshaphat (2 Chronicles 18:4), and Hezekiah (2 Kings 19:1–4) illustrate righteous rulers consulting Yahweh in crises. 3. Prophetic sanction: failure to inquire invited covenant curses (Isaiah 30:1–2). Josiah’s action thus aligned him with faithful predecessors and distanced him from apostate ones (cf. Ahaz, 2 Kings 16:7–13). Why Delegates? The Function of Royal Envoys Kings often deputized high officials to petition prophets: • Hilkiah the high priest—spiritual custodian. • Shaphan the scribe—royal archivist, literate in legal procedure. • Ahikam, Achbor, Asaiah—court officials ensuring swift administrative compliance. Delegation conveyed urgency and communal responsibility: “for me, for the people, and for all Judah” (2 Kings 22:13). It also demonstrated humility; the king submits to the prophetic word rather than presuming direct access. Selection of Huldah the Prophetess The delegation consulted Huldah (2 Kings 22:14) rather than Jeremiah, who was active at the time. Her established prophetic reputation in Jerusalem and discernment for Torah matters likely prompted the choice. Her message confirmed impending judgment yet promised personal reprieve for Josiah due to his penitence (2 Kings 22:15–20), vindicating the decision to inquire. Legal-Covenantal Motive Josiah recognized four covenant realities: 1. Authority—The Book of the Law bound Judah legally. 2. Guilt—“Our fathers have not obeyed” (v. 13). 3. Wrath—Divine anger was “great” (gadol), echoing Deuteronomy 29:27. 4. Remedy—Prophetic inquiry could yield mercy and guidance (cf. Joel 2:12–14). Theological Weight: Fear of the LORD and Reformation Catalyst The inquiry marked the decisive pivot from discovery to nationwide reformation (2 Kings 23). Without prophetic confirmation, reforms might have been cosmetic; with it, they carried divine sanction. Fear of Yahweh (Proverbs 1:7) transformed into actionable policy—purging idolatry, restoring Passover (2 Kings 23:21), and re-establishing covenant celebration. Archaeological Corroboration • LMLK jar handles and royal seal impressions from late-7th-century strata at Lachish and Ramat Rahel verify heightened bureaucratic activity in Josiah’s era. • Bullae bearing names tied to Josiah’s court—“Gemaryahu son of Shaphan” unearthed in the City of David—demonstrate the historicity of the Shaphan scribal line (cf. Jeremiah 36:10). • Ketef Hinnom silver scrolls (late-7th century BC) preserve the priestly blessing (Numbers 6:24–26), confirming contemporaneous textual transmission of Torah material, underscoring the plausibility of Hilkiah’s find. Christological Foreshadowing Josiah’s mediatory role and reliance on revealed law prefigure Christ, the ultimate King who perfectly fulfills and interprets Torah (Matthew 5:17). The Book of the Law’s rediscovery anticipates the incarnate Word’s manifestation (John 1:14) and spurs covenant renewal echoed in the New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31–34). Practical Application for Modern Readers 1. Scripture must confront and shape conscience. 2. Leaders bear responsibility to seek God’s counsel before policy reform. 3. Corporate renewal begins with individual contrition. 4. Prophetic voices grounded in God’s Word remain vital for discernment. Conclusion King Josiah sent officials to inquire of the LORD because the freshly discovered Book of the Law revealed Judah’s covenant breach, provoked fear of divine wrath, and compelled him—consistent with Mosaic precedent and righteous royal example—to seek authoritative prophetic guidance for national repentance and reform. |
    |