Why did Rebekah dress Jacob in Esau's clothes in Genesis 27:15? Text of Genesis 27:15 “Then Rebekah took the finest clothes of her older son Esau, which were in her house, and she put them on her younger son Jacob.” Historical and Cultural Background Patriarchal blessings in the Middle Bronze Age were formal, spoken covenants, believed to carry legal force equal to later written contracts. Extra-biblical Nuzi tablets (15th c. BC) show that a father’s oral blessing could supersede primogeniture and was considered irrevocable. Clothing often functioned as an identity marker; tablets from Mari (18th c. BC) record ceremonies in which the transfer of special garments accompanied the conferral of inheritance rights. Rebekah’s act therefore aligned with known cultural protocols: dressing Jacob in Esau’s garments presented him as the legal recipient of Isaac’s irrevocable benediction. Maternal Motivation: Obedience to Prophecy Before the twins were born, the Lord declared, “The older shall serve the younger” (Genesis 25:23). Rebekah believed this oracle and acted to secure its fulfillment. While her method involved deception, her underlying motive was alignment with God’s stated preference for Jacob as covenant heir. Sensory Strategy: Overcoming Isaac’s Limitations Isaac, now elderly and nearly blind (Genesis 27:1), would rely on touch, smell, and hearing. Rebekah covered Jacob’s arms and neck with “the skins of the young goats” (27:16) to imitate Esau’s hairiness and clothed him in Esau’s field-worn garments so that, when Isaac “smelled the scent of his clothing” (27:27), he would conclude, “Ah, the smell of my son is like the smell of a field that the LORD has blessed.” The plan targeted all three senses that could betray Jacob’s true identity. Legal and Symbolic Significance of Garments 1. Identification: In ANE culture, a person’s distinctive robe signified status and personhood (cf. Joseph’s coat, Genesis 37:3). 2. Transference: Wearing Esau’s raiment symbolically transferred firstborn rights, echoing earlier exchange of the birthright for stew (25:33). 3. Covenant Token: The “finest clothes” (lit. “best garments,” Hebrew ḥamuddōṯ) were likely ceremonial garments Esau wore when ministering to Isaac, strengthening the legal impression that Jacob legitimately stood in Esau’s stead. Theological Implications: Providence Amid Deception Scripture never condones lying (Exodus 20:16; Proverbs 12:22) yet frequently shows God accomplishing His redemptive purposes through imperfect agents (Genesis 50:20). Romans 9:10-13 cites this episode to illustrate sovereign election. Hebrews 11:20 notes, “By faith Isaac blessed Jacob and Esau in regard to their future,” confirming the blessing’s enduring covenantal authority despite the human intrigue surrounding it. Ethical Considerations: Does Scripture Approve? Rebekah’s scheme had immediate negative consequences: family division, Jacob’s exile, and Esau’s murderous anger. The narrative’s candor about these repercussions demonstrates that God’s word records sin without endorsing it. Instead, the episode teaches that divine sovereignty can overrule human failings while holding individuals morally accountable (Galatians 6:7). Typological Foreshadowing of Substitution Jacob, the chosen yet undeserving son, appears before the father clothed in the garments of the firstborn, bearing the aroma that pleases the father, and receives the blessing. This prefigures believers appearing before God clothed in the righteousness of the true Firstborn, Jesus Christ (2 Corinthians 5:21; Galatians 3:27). The goats whose skins covered Jacob further anticipate substitutionary sacrifice culminating in Christ, “the Lamb of God” (John 1:29). Consequences in Salvation History The blessing secured by Jacob propagated the Abrahamic covenant through his line, leading to the twelve tribes, the nation of Israel, and ultimately the Messiah (Matthew 1:2). Without Rebekah’s intervention, Isaac’s favoritism toward Esau might have jeopardized that lineage, yet God’s promise remained inviolable. Archaeological Corroboration of Customs • Nuzi Tablet HSS 5 67: records a father bypassing the elder son in favor of a younger via spoken blessing. • Mari Letter ARM 10 129: mentions bestowing “the garment of my office” to signify succession. These findings align with Genesis 27’s depiction of inheritance rituals, reinforcing its historic plausibility. Practical Applications and Lessons 1. Trust God’s promises without resorting to unethical shortcuts. 2. Recognize the danger of parental favoritism. 3. Marvel at God’s grace that works through imperfect people to bring forth His perfect plan. 4. See in Jacob’s borrowed garments a picture of the believer’s need for Christ’s righteousness. Answer in Summation Rebekah dressed Jacob in Esau’s clothes to present him legally, sensorially, and symbolically as the firstborn so that the covenant blessing—promised by God to the younger—would be conferred on Jacob. Her action reflected cultural norms of the day, exploited Isaac’s failing senses, fulfilled divine prophecy, and served as a typological shadow of substitutionary grace, all while illustrating God’s sovereignty over and through human frailty. |
    |