Why does David call the Messiah "Lord" in Luke 20:42? Canonical Text “‘The Lord said to my Lord, “Sit at My right hand 43 until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet.” ’ ” (Luke 20:42–43; citing Psalm 110:1) Context in Luke Jesus asks, “How can they say that the Christ is the Son of David?” (20:41). By quoting Psalm 110:1 He exposes a dilemma for His listeners: if Messiah is merely David’s physical descendant, how can David, Israel’s greatest king, address that same descendant as “Lord” (Hebrew ʼădonî, Greek kurios)? Davidic Authorship and Inspiration 1 Chronicles 28:19 records David’s claim that “the hand of the LORD” gave him prophetic insight. Psalm 110 titles itself “Of David,” and every extant Hebrew manuscript—including the Dead Sea Scroll fragment 11Q5—retains the superscription. Qumran texts (e.g., 4QFlorilegium) interpret Psalm 110 messianically centuries before Christ, confirming both Davidic authorship and pre-Christian expectation. Royal Enthronement Imagery “Sit at My right hand” evokes ancient Near-Eastern court protocol where the co-ruler shares the monarch’s throne (cf. 1 Kings 2:19). The footstool motif (Psalm 132:7) signifies absolute subjugation. David prophesies an heir who will share Yahweh’s throne—language no mere mortal could rightly claim (cf. Isaiah 48:11). Messiah: Davidic and Divine Scripture holds both truths simultaneously: • Descendant: 2 Samuel 7:12–13; Jeremiah 23:5 • Divine: Isaiah 9:6; Micah 5:2—“His origins are from ancient times, from the days of eternity.” Thus David, writing by the Spirit (2 Samuel 23:2), perceives Messiah’s two natures: truly his son according to the flesh, yet eternally sovereign. Early Jewish Reception Targum Jonathan paraphrases Psalm 110:1: “The LORD said to His Word, ‘Sit at My right hand…’ ” Here “His Word” (Memra) functions as a divine agent. The Babylonian Talmud (Sanhedrin 98b) cites Psalm 110 when discussing Messiah’s identity. Pre-Christian Judaism already wrestled with a supra-human Messiah. New-Covenant Fulfillment Acts 2:34–36: Peter quotes Psalm 110, declaring Jesus’ resurrection and ascension as the enthronement David foresaw. The empty tomb—attested by women witnesses (an embarrassing detail if fabricated), hostile corroboration (“tell them His disciples stole Him,” Matthew 28:13), and early, multiply attested creed (1 Corinthians 15:3–7)—provides the historical anchor for Christ’s current session at the Father’s right hand (Hebrews 1:3). Archaeological Corroboration of David The Tel Dan Stele (9th century BC) reads “House of David,” ending minimalist claims that David was legend. Excavations in the City of David reveal massive structures (the “Stepped Stone Structure,” Large Stone Building) aligned with 10th-century Jerusalem, consistent with a united monarchy. A real David lends weight to a real prophetic Psalm. Philosophical Implication If Messiah is both man and David’s Lord, then ultimate authority rests not in human regimes but in the incarnate Creator. Humanity’s deepest longings—purpose, forgiveness, immortality—are met only when we, like David, acknowledge Jesus as “my Lord” (Romans 10:9). Practical Exhortation David calls Messiah “Lord” because he recognized, by divine revelation, the coming King who is greater than he. The appropriate human response is the same: repentance, faith, and joyful submission to the risen, reigning Christ, in whom “all things hold together” (Colossians 1:17). Summary David’s unusual address flows from the Holy Spirit’s unveiling of a descendant who is simultaneously divine. Jesus cites it to compel His hearers—ancient and modern—to surrender neat but inadequate categories and bow to the incarnate Lord, the only Savior and everlasting King. |
    |