In Job 13:22, what is the significance of Job asking God to "answer" him? Text of Job 13:22 “Then summon me and I will answer, or let me speak, and You reply to me.” Immediate Context Job has just declared his intention to “defend my ways to His face” (13:15). He insists that his friends’ counsel is worthless and that only direct audience with the Almighty will resolve the questions of his integrity and suffering. Verse 22 forms the climactic request: either God calls Job to the stand so Job can respond, or God allows Job to prosecute his own case and then God must answer. Legal-Courtroom Imagery 1. “Summon” (Heb. qārā’) is technical language for calling a witness into court, attested in Old Babylonian and Neo-Assyrian legal tablets (e.g., Code of Hammurabi §3). 2. “Answer” (ʿānâ) and “reply” (hāšîbēnî) are verbs used in dispute settings (cf. Deuteronomy 19:16–18). Job casts God as both Judge and Opposing Counsel, underscoring how extraordinary the request is. 3. Prophetic “covenant-lawsuit” (rîb) passages—Isa 1:18; Micah 6:1-2—show the same pattern: summons, speech, counter-speech. Job appropriates that form, demonstrating he still views himself inside the covenant framework. Boldness Rooted in Covenant Faith Job’s plea is not arrogant rebellion but covenant confidence. Abraham asked, “Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?” (Genesis 18:25). Moses pleaded face to face (Exodus 33:11). The psalmists repeatedly cry, “Answer me!” (Psalm 4:1; 143:1). Job stands in that lineage, convinced Yahweh invites honest petition. Literary Function in the Book The verse establishes the rhetorical tension that drives the remainder of the drama. • Human speeches end in ch. 31; God finally answers in ch. 38, precisely fulfilling Job’s request. • Job’s demand highlights God’s silent sovereignty; when God speaks, the imbalance of power becomes evident, yet Job’s faith is vindicated (42:7-8). Theological Significance 1. Divine Accessibility: Job presumes God is personal, rational, and communicative, contra deistic or pantheistic notions. 2. Human Dignity: Made imago Dei (Genesis 1:27), Job expects meaningful dialogue, not deterministic silence. 3. Foreshadowing Mediation: Job longs for an arbiter (9:33) and ultimately a Redeemer (19:25). The New Testament reveals the fulfillment in Christ, “the one Mediator between God and men” (1 Timothy 2:5). Job’s cry anticipates the incarnation, where God both summons and answers in the person of Jesus. Pastoral and Behavioral Application Clinical research on lament (e.g., Mayo Clinic chaplaincy studies, 2019) shows that honest prayer correlates with resilience. Job models psychologically healthy engagement: voicing complaint while maintaining relational attachment. Believers today may petition God frankly, confident of His fatherly hearing (Romans 8:15). Christological Connection At the cross the roles reverse: God summons the Son, and the Son answers, “It is finished” (John 19:30). Post-resurrection, Jesus invites, “Ask, and it will be given to you” (Matthew 7:7). Job’s request finds ultimate satisfaction in the resurrected Christ who both speaks for God and responds for humankind (Hebrews 1:1-3). Canonical Echoes • Psalm 27:7—“Hear my voice when I call, O LORD; be merciful and answer me.” • Isaiah 65:24—“Before they call, I will answer.” These echoes show Job’s plea is integral to the wider scriptural testimony of divine dialogue. Conclusion Job 13:22 is significant because it encapsulates covenant boldness, legal lament, and eschatological hope. By demanding reciprocal speech, Job affirms God’s moral governance and foreshadows the redemptive dialogue consummated in Christ. |
    |