Why does kinsman refuse in Ruth 4:6?
Why does the kinsman-redeemer refuse to redeem in Ruth 4:6?

Setting the Scene

• Naomi is selling the land of her late husband Elimelech (Ruth 4:3).

• Boaz gathers the nearer kinsman-redeemer and ten elders at the city gate to settle the matter publicly (Ruth 4:1-2).

• At first the nearer relative agrees to buy the land (Ruth 4:4).


The Added Obligation

• Boaz then states the full package: “On the day you buy the land from Naomi, you must also acquire Ruth the Moabitess … to maintain the name of the dead with his inheritance” (Ruth 4:5).

• This means a levirate-style marriage (cf. Deuteronomy 25:5-6) and raising children who would legally inherit Elimelech’s property, not the redeemer’s existing heirs.


The Refusal Stated

Ruth 4:6: “The kinsman-redeemer replied, ‘I cannot redeem it myself, lest I jeopardize my own inheritance. Take my right of redemption, because I cannot redeem it.’ ”


What “Jeopardize My Own Inheritance” Means

1. Financial Risk

• Redeeming the land required immediate payment (Leviticus 25:25-27).

• Supporting Naomi and Ruth added ongoing costs.

2. Dilution of Current Heirs’ Portion

• Any son born to Ruth would legally carry Mahlon’s name (Ruth 4:10) and inherit the redeemed land.

• The redeemer’s money would secure property that would not stay in his family line, shrinking what his present children would receive.

3. Potential Complication of Family Holdings

• Land allotments in Israel were to remain within tribes and families (Numbers 36:7-9).

• Mixing another lineage could threaten the clarity of his estate’s boundaries at the Jubilee (Leviticus 25:28).

4. Social and Spiritual Concerns

• Ruth is a Moabitess; some Israelites still viewed Moabites warily (Deuteronomy 23:3).

• Marrying her could risk reputational standing, especially for a man already established.


Legal Background in Brief

• Land redemption: Leviticus 25:23-34.

• Levirate marriage: Deuteronomy 25:5-10.

• Both obligations converge uniquely in Naomi’s case; the law never required one man to fulfill both, so refusal was allowed without public disgrace.


Boaz’s Willing Acceptance

• Boaz assumes the cost and the covenant, exemplifying steadfast love (hesed).

• His action foreshadows the greater Redeemer who “did not please Himself” (Romans 15:3) but paid the full price to secure an inheritance for others (Ephesians 1:7-11).


Key Takeaways

• The nearer kinsman’s refusal was pragmatic, not cruel—he counted the cost and found it too high (Luke 14:28-30).

• God used that refusal to spotlight Boaz, whose self-sacrificing love reflects the heart of true redemption.

• Scripture underscores that redemption is costly; only one both able and willing can accomplish it (Isaiah 59:16).

What is the meaning of Ruth 4:6?
Top of Page
Top of Page