Why does Romans 1:30 include "God-haters" among other sinful behaviors? Text (Romans 1:28-32) “Furthermore, just as they did not see fit to retain the knowledge of God, He gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what is not right. They are filled with every kind of unrighteousness, wickedness, covetousness, and malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, and hostility. They are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant, and boastful. They invent new forms of evil; they disobey their parents. They are senseless, faithless, heartless, merciless. Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things are worthy of death, they not only continue to do these things, but also approve of those who practice them.” Contextual Placement in Paul’s Sin Catalogue Romans 1:18-32 is a judicial “handing over” triad (vv. 24, 26, 28). Each surrender deepens moral collapse. By v. 30 the mind has been “tested and found worthless” (adokimos). Thus “God-haters” stands midway: it both explains the preceding relational sins (envy, murder) and fuels the following antisocial traits (insolence, disobedience to parents). Paul arranges the list chiastically: vertical rebellion (against God) surfaces as horizontal chaos (against neighbor). Theological Significance of Hostility Toward God 1. Rejection of Creator rights (Romans 1:20). Once the evidence of design is suppressed (teleological argument: Psalm 19:1; Acts 14:17), gratitude evaporates (v. 21), and resentment takes its place. 2. Usurpation of glory (v. 23). Idolatry deifies the creature, so genuine deity becomes a rival to be despised (cf. Exodus 20:5 “a jealous God”). 3. Covenant lawsuit motif. OT prophets listed “haters of God” in legal indictments (Deuteronomy 32:41; 2 Chron 19:2). Paul, a trained rabbi (Acts 22:3), imports this forensic language into his Gentile polemic. Relation to Suppression of Truth and Idolatry Verses 18-25 outline a four-step descent: (1) revelation, (2) suppression, (3) idolatry, (4) moral inversion. “God-hater” crystallizes stage 4. Hatred is not the cause but the consequence of prolonged suppression. This mirrors Pharaoh’s hardening (Exodus 7-14) and anticipates the “man of lawlessness” who “opposes and exalts himself against every so-called god” (2 Thessalonians 2:4). Canonical Echoes and OT Background • Psalm 81:15 (LXX 80:16) foretells that “those who hate the LORD” will cringe before Him. • Proverbs 8:36 portrays wisdom (pre-incarnate Logos) lamenting: “all who hate me love death.” Paul’s list echoes this death-driven antipathy. • Jesus equates hatred of Himself with hatred of the Father (John 15:23), affirming intra-Trinitarian unity and underscoring the gravity of theostygia. Covenantal and Eschatological Implications In covenant terms, hatred of God warrants exile and curse (Leviticus 26:17). Eschatologically, it anticipates final judgment: Revelation 16:9 pictures rebels who “blasphemed the name of God and did not repent.” Romans 1:30 is thus prototypical; the same heart condition climaxes in Armageddon. The antithesis is the regenerate heart promised in the New Covenant (Ezekiel 36:26) that loves God (Matthew 22:37). Pastoral and Evangelistic Application Labeling sin is not spite but grace; diagnosis precedes cure. Romans immediately pivots (3:21-26) to the atonement: the God who is hated offers propitiation. The evangelist therefore confronts rebels, yet invites them: “While we were God’s enemies, we were reconciled through the death of His Son” (5:10). Transformative testimonies—from Saul the persecutor (Acts 9) to modern converts—demonstrate that divine love overcomes divine hatred. Conclusion Paul includes “God-haters” to unveil the apex of fallen hostility, link vertical and horizontal depravity, and magnify the necessity and sufficiency of Christ’s redemptive work. Recognition of this category humbles believers, warns skeptics, and clarifies that the ultimate human problem is not ignorance but animosity requiring supernatural regeneration. |
    |