Why mention Shemaiah's descendants?
Why are the descendants of Shemaiah mentioned in 1 Chronicles 3:24?

Immediate Text

“The descendants of Shecaniah: Shemaiah and his sons—Hattush, Igal, Bariah, Neariah, and Shaphat—six in all.” (1 Chronicles 3:22)

Some Hebrew manuscripts number this sentence as v. 24; English editions usually record it as v. 22. The question centers on why the Chronicler includes this single generation (“Shemaiah … six in all”) at the close of David’s royal genealogy.


Genealogical Setting within 1 Chronicles 3

• Chapters 1–2 hurry from Adam to David.

• Chapter 3 slows dramatically to track David’s royal seed through the Babylonian exile.

• The list reaches Zerubbabel (v. 19)—the recognized governor of the post-exilic community (Haggai 1:1).

• From Zerubbabel the line is traced forward three more generations—Shecaniah, Shemaiah, Neariah, Elioenai—ending with the names of men evidently living in the Chronicler’s own lifetime.


Identity of Shemaiah

Shemaiah is the grandson of Zerubbabel (David → Solomon → … → Jeconiah → Shealtiel → Zerubbabel → Hananiah → Shecaniah → Shemaiah). That puts him roughly 100 years after the first return from exile (c. 450–440 BC on a conservative Ussher-style timeline).


Why List Shemaiah’s Six Sons?

4.1 Legal Preservation of the Davidic Claim

Under Persian rule, Judah was a small province without a native king. Yet God’s covenant with David (“I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever,” 2 Samuel 7:13) still stood. By naming every surviving male, the Chronicler documents that the royal line is unbroken, maintaining legal continuity until Messiah’s appearance (cf. Luke 3:23-27).

4.2 Post-Exilic Civic Leadership

One of Shemaiah’s sons, Hattush, resurfaces in Ezra 8:2 as a leader who travels with Ezra from Babylon to Jerusalem (458 BC). Mentioning Hattush’s brothers fills out that same family cluster, corroborating Ezra’s memoir and showing that the Chronicler’s genealogy and Ezra’s narrative overlap historically.

4.3 Encouragement to a Dispirited Community

Readers in the late-fifth century BC wondered whether God had abandoned the Davidic promises. By ending the genealogy with men still alive (“six in all”), the Chronicler signals, “Look—there are living heirs; Yahweh has kept His word.”

4.4 Numerological Completeness

Six names form a symmetrical unit that balances earlier triads (v. 23: three sons of Neariah; v. 24: seven sons of Elioenai). In Hebrew narrative, balanced numbers communicate order and divine design (e.g., Genesis 1’s six workdays + one Sabbath).


Theological Implications

6.1 Covenant Continuity

Listing Shemaiah’s descendants advertises that the Davidic covenant passes through the exile intact. Matthew 1 and Luke 3 will later exploit the same post-exilic section (Shealtiel-Zerubbabel) when charting Christ’s legal and biological rights to David’s throne.

6.2 Messianic Hope Anchored in History

A real genealogy prevents mythologizing. If the line can be traced man-by-man from David to men contemporaneous with the Chronicler, then the promise of a future Son of David who would rise from the dead (Acts 2:30-32) is grounded, not speculative.

6.3 God’s Providence in the “Silent Years”

Between Malachi and Matthew lie roughly four centuries. Chronicles closes that gap, in part, by preserving the latest known registers of David’s house. Shemaiah’s six sons become a bridge from prophetic word to incarnate fulfillment.


Practical Takeaways for the Reader

• God keeps meticulous records; no believer is forgotten (Malachi 3:16; Revelation 20:12).

• Divine promises may appear delayed, yet they never lapse (2 Peter 3:9).

• Participation in God’s story—like Hattush’s decision to accompany Ezra—rests on lineage but also on personal faithfulness.


Conclusion

The Chronicler names Shemaiah’s six sons to demonstrate an unbroken, verifiable Davidic line after the exile, to corroborate concurrent historical narratives, to fuel covenant hope, and to signal God’s precise providence over His people. Far from an extraneous footnote, 1 Chronicles 3:24 (22) is a hinge on which the credibility of the Messianic promise quietly turns.

How does 1 Chronicles 3:24 contribute to understanding the lineage of David?
Top of Page
Top of Page