Why does Psalm 74:9 mention the absence of signs and prophets? Text of Psalm 74:9 “There are no signs for us to see. There is no longer any prophet, and none of us knows how long this will last.” Literary Context Psalm 74 is a communal lament attributed to Asaph (v. 1). Verses 1–11 describe devastation of the sanctuary and apparent divine abandonment; verses 12–17 rehearse God’s past redemptive power; verses 18–23 petition God to act again. Verse 9 sits at the heart of the complaint section, contrasting Israel’s former history—rich in signs and prophetic word—with the present vacuum. Historical Setting Internal cues (vv. 3–8, especially “They burned Your sanctuary to the ground” v. 7) align with the Babylonian destruction of Solomon’s temple in 586 BC (2 Kings 25:8-10). The Babylonian Chronicle tablets (ABC 5) confirm Nebuchadnezzar’s 19th-year campaign matching Scripture’s chronology. The psalm likely voices survivors in the immediate aftermath, before Jeremiah’s words reached refugees (Jeremiah 44:1). Some scholars posit an earlier invasion under Jehoiakim (609-598 BC), yet the total temple destruction reference fits 586 BC best. Meaning of “Signs” (Hebrew ’ōtôt) in the Old Testament 1. Miraculous confirmations of covenant power (Exodus 4:8-9). 2. Deliverance markers (Joshua 4:6-7). 3. Cosmic portents (Isaiah 7:11; Joel 2:30-31). The psalmist laments the absence of any divine intervention or confirming wonder in the crisis. Meaning of “Prophet” (Hebrew nāḇî’) A prophet conveys Yahweh’s word, often accompanied by signs (1 Samuel 3:20-4:1). Prophets guide, warn, and encourage (Hosea 12:13). The declaration “no longer any prophet” reflects perceived silence, though Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Obadiah were contemporaries. The worshipers in ruined Jerusalem, however, had been cut off from them geographically (Jeremiah in Egypt/Benjamin, Ezekiel in Babylon) and spiritually (Jeremiah 25:3-7 records 23 years of rejected calls). Why the Psalmist Experiences Absence 1. Covenant Judgment Deut 28:15-68 foretells that disobedience would result in national calamity and temporary withdrawal of revelatory privilege (vv. 45-48). Israel’s idolatry (2 Chronicles 36:14-16) invited the very silence they now sense. 2. Geographic Dislocation Prophetic ministry had shifted to exile communities (Ezekiel 3:11-15). Those left in Judah lacked resident spokesmen (2 Kings 25:22–26). 3. Psychological Despair Trauma can dull perception of God’s activity (Lamentations 3:8). Like Gideon’s cry, “Where then are all His wonders?” (Judges 6:13), the lament verbalizes raw grief rather than systematic theology. Apparent Paradox: Jeremiah Was Active Jeremiah 42–44 shows the prophet still alive post-destruction, yet the remnant dismissed him (Jeremiah 43:2). The psalm’s corporate voice honestly reports the majority experience, not a literal census of prophetic individuals. Scripture often speaks phenomenologically (Psalm 10:1; Isaiah 63:19). Divine Silence as Covenant Discipline Amos 8:11-12 warns of “a famine of hearing the words of the LORD.” The exile fulfilled this; the silence was medicinal, designed to produce repentance (Lamentations 3:28-33). When Judah returned, prophetic voice resumed (Haggai 1:1). Typological and Messianic Implications The void of signs and prophets foreshadows the inter-testamental “400 silent years.” That silence was broken by John the Baptist (Matthew 3:1-3) and ultimately by the incarnate Logos (Hebrews 1:1-2). Jesus identified His resurrection as “the sign of Jonah” (Matthew 12:39-40), the climactic answer to Psalm 74’s plea. New Testament Fulfillment of the Cry for Signs 1 Cor 15:3-8 lists eyewitness testimony to the risen Christ—over 500 witnesses, many still alive when Paul wrote. Dr. Gary Habermas catalogues 17 independent resurrection evidences, matching the “sign” motif. Acts records prophetic ministry restored in Agabus (Acts 11:28) and others, showing God’s renewed speaking. Application for Believers Today • Seasons of perceived silence do not equal divine absence (Psalm 13). • Scripture remains a prophetic word “more certain” (2 Peter 1:19). • The ultimate sign—the empty tomb (John 20:8)—permanently assures God’s faithfulness. Archaeological Corroboration of the Psalm’s Setting • Nebuchadnezzar II’s Babylonian Chronicle details the siege of Jerusalem in 586 BC. • Burn layers unearthed in Area G of the City of David show charred debris and arrowheads dated to that invasion. • Lachish Letter 4 laments, “We are watching for the signals of Lachish, but we cannot see them,” an extra-biblical lament of prophetic silence paralleling Psalm 74:9. Encouragement from Intelligent Design and God’s Sovereignty Observations of irreducible complexity (e.g., bacterial flagellum) and fine-tuning constants underscore that the Creator who orchestrates micro-machinery is equally competent to orchestrate redemptive history. The periodic silence of Psalm 74 sits within a larger tapestry where every thread—scientific, historical, prophetic—ultimately glorifies Him (Romans 11:36). Conclusion Psalm 74:9 records a real, historical moment when divine communication seemed to cease, fulfilling covenant warnings yet preparing God’s people for greater revelation. The lament teaches that perceived silence invites repentance, anticipation, and ultimately trust in the ultimate sign and Prophet—Jesus Christ—whose resurrection forever answers the cry, “How long?” |
    |