Why did Jeshua and Zerubbabel prioritize rebuilding the altar in Ezra 3:2? Historical and Canonical Setting After Cyrus II’s decree (cf. Ezra 1:1–4) in 538 BC, approximately fifty thousand Judeans returned from Babylon to a devastated Jerusalem (Ezra 2:64–65). The Temple was a charred heap, its precincts overgrown, and hostile peoples occupied the surrounding regions (Ezra 4:1–5). In the seventh month of their first year back—Tishri, the holiest point in Israel’s calendar—the remnant gathered “as one man” (Ezra 3:1). Jeshua son of Jozadak (high-priestly line) and Zerubbabel son of Shealtiel (Davidic line) thus stood at the intersection of priestly and royal authority predicted in Zechariah 6:13. Their first corporate act was not building walls or homes but reconstructing the bronze-draped stone altar on Mount Moriah (Ezra 3:2). The Centrality of Sacrifice in Covenant Theology Leviticus 17:11 declares, “the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you … to make atonement for your souls” . Sacrifice stood at the heart of Israel’s covenant relationship (Exodus 24:8). Without a functioning altar, the restored community could not approach Yahweh, celebrate mandated feasts, or receive atonement. Re-erecting the altar therefore re-established the covenantal conduit of grace ahead of all other projects. Obedience to the Mosaic Pattern Ezra 3:2 says they “built the altar of the God of Israel to offer burnt offerings … as it is written in the Law of Moses the man of God” . Deuteronomy 12:5–14 requires sacrifice only at “the place Yahweh will choose.” That place, affirmed by 2 Chronicles 3:1, was Moriah. By copying the Mosaic dimensions (Exodus 27:1–8) and location, Jeshua and Zerubbabel signaled total submission to Scripture’s authority—an example later cited by Nehemiah 8 when Ezra read the Law publicly. Liturgical Urgency: The Feasts of the Seventh Month The seventh month hosted the Feast of Trumpets (Leviticus 23:24), the Day of Atonement (Leviticus 16), and the Feast of Booths (Leviticus 23:34). Each required daily sacrificial cycles (Numbers 29). With the month already begun, the leaders hurried to provide a legal altar so that corporate worship would not lapse another year. The subsequent verses confirm they “celebrated the Feast of Booths” immediately (Ezra 3:4). Spiritual Defense in a Hostile Environment Ezra 3:3 notes, “They set the altar on its foundation, because fear was on them due to the peoples of the lands” . Surrounded by syncretistic Samaritans, Ammonites, and Ashdodites, the returnees believed their best defense was divine favor secured through rightful worship (cf. Psalm 20:1–2). In Scripture, altars often mark decisive spiritual battles—Elijah on Carmel (1 Kings 18) and David averting plague (2 Samuel 24). Rebuilding the altar proclaimed Yahweh’s sovereignty over local deities and imperial powers alike. Prophetic Fulfillment and Messianic Anticipation Isaiah 56:7 foresaw a restored “house of prayer for all nations,” while Jeremiah 33:17–18 promised perpetuity to both the Davidic throne and Levitical sacrifices. By acting jointly, Zerubbabel (heir of David) and Jeshua (high priest) enacted these twin prophecies, prefiguring the ultimate Priest-King, Jesus Christ (Hebrews 7; Zechariah 6:12–13). The restored altar thus functioned as an eschatological signpost pointing forward to the once-for-all sacrifice at Calvary (Hebrews 10:10–14). Archaeological and Extrabiblical Corroboration • The Cyrus Cylinder (British Museum, c. 539 BC) validates Cyrus’s policy of repatriating exiled peoples and financing temple reconstructions, harmonizing with Ezra 1. • The 5th-century BC Elephantine Papyri reference a functioning Yahwistic temple and altar in Egypt, confirming that Second-Temple liturgy paralleled Ezra-Nehemiah’s descriptions. • Temple-mount excavations reveal scorched 6th-century BC debris layers and subsequent Persian-period construction fill, consistent with a rapid rebuild focused first on sacrificial installations before large-scale masonry. Chronological Considerations within a Young-Earth Framework A conservative Ussher-style chronology places Creation at 4004 BC and the Babylonian exile in 586 BC. The return under Cyrus thus occurs c. 538 BC, roughly 3,466 years post-Creation, maintaining the Scriptural metanarrative of redemption history without evolutionary timescales. The rapid altar reconstruction within months of return exemplifies God’s providential timing in every dispensation. Practical Engineering and Availability of Resources An altar required far fewer stones and timbers than the Temple superstructure (Ezra 5:8). Burned but reusable foundation blocks likely remained (Ezra 3:3). Cedar shipments from Lebanon (Ezra 3:7) would arrive later for the Temple; the altar, therefore, could be completed immediately using local limestone, enabling compliance with Levitical law before winter rains set in. Didactic and Evangelistic Implications The priority of the altar teaches modern readers that reconciliation with God must precede all other endeavors—political, economic, or architectural. It foreshadows the New Covenant axiom: “First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and present your offering” (Matthew 5:24). For unbelievers, the passage confronts the innate human impulse to self-justify through projects; Scripture insists, rather, on substitutionary atonement. Summary Answer Jeshua and Zerubbabel rebuilt the altar first because (1) covenant obedience demanded immediate sacrificial worship, (2) the festivals of the seventh month required offerings, (3) they sought divine protection amid external threats, (4) they acted to fulfill prophetic promises tying priesthood and kingship together, and (5) the altar’s manageable scale allowed quick restoration. Their action re-centered the community on atonement, anticipated the Messiah’s ultimate sacrifice, and demonstrated that true restoration begins with right relationship to God. |
    |