What is the significance of returning to Israel in Matthew 2:20? The Text Of Matthew 2:20 “Get up,” he said. “Take the Child and His mother and go to the land of Israel, for those seeking the Child’s life are dead.” Immediate Narrative Context Matthew records four angelic dreams given to Joseph (Matthew 1:20; 2:13, 19, 22). The third dream—2:19-20—signals that the danger posed by Herod the Great has passed and instructs a return from Egypt. The command is geographical (“the land of Israel”), familial (“take the Child and His mother”), and temporal (“those … are dead”), tying Jesus’ safety and mission to God’s precise timing. Historical And Chronological Validity Herod the Great died in 4 BC (Josephus, Antiquities 17.191). Coins, ossuaries, and the excavated Herodium confirm both his reign and burial. Matthew’s notice that Archelaus (4 BC–AD 6) reigned next (Matthew 2:22) dovetails exactly with secular chronology. Such synchrony showcases the Gospel’s reliability down to provincial politics, strengthening confidence in the historicity of the infancy narrative. Prophetic Fulfillment And Typological Significance 1. Exodus motif: “Out of Egypt I called My Son” (Hosea 11:1) is explicitly applied to Jesus in Matthew 2:15. Return is required for that prophecy to reach completion. 2. Restoration motif: Israel’s national story runs from exile to return. Jesus, embodying true Israel, reenacts this arc, signaling that He will succeed where the nation failed. Land Theology: “The Land Of Israel” The phrase occurs only here in the New Testament. It is covenant-loaded language recalling Genesis 12:1-3 and Deuteronomy 30:1-5. By ordering Jesus back to the covenant land, God roots the Messiah’s public life in the promised soil, emphasizing that redemption is not abstract but incarnational and geographic. Jesus As True Israel: Exile-And-Return Pattern Adam was expelled east of Eden; Jacob’s family went down to Egypt; Judah went to Babylon. In each case God orchestrated a return. Jesus, the representative Son, follows the same pattern, but without sin, thereby qualifying to reverse the curse for His people (Romans 5:18-19). The Exodus Echo: The New Moses Matthew repeatedly parallels Moses and Jesus: threatened infancy (Exodus 1; Matthew 2), wilderness testing (Exodus 16–17; Matthew 4), mountain teaching (Sinai; Sermon on the Mount). Commanding Joseph to “go” mirrors God’s call to Moses to return to Egypt (Exodus 4:19: “all the men who wanted to kill you are dead”). The echo is deliberate, presenting Jesus as the greater Deliverer. Divine Protection And Sovereign Guidance The angel does not suggest but commands, framing Joseph’s obedience as a model for believers. God’s providence works through supernatural revelation and meticulous timing. This undergirds the doctrine of God’s meticulous sovereignty—every event, ruler, and border shift serves the preservation of Messiah and the accomplishment of redemption (Acts 2:23). Archaeological And Extra-Biblical Support • The Migdal Synagogue (discovered 2009) and Gamla synagogue (1st c. BC) show Galilee’s thriving Jewish culture, validating Matthew’s setting for Jesus’ later ministry. • The existence of a sizable Jewish community in Roman Egypt is documented on papyri (e.g., the Fayum Letters), making Joseph’s sojourn logistically credible. Christological Implications: Preparing For Galilee By relocating Jesus to Nazareth, the prophecy “He will be called a Nazarene” (Matthew 2:23) is fulfilled. Galilee, a crossroads of Jew and Gentile (Isaiah 9:1-2), becomes the launching pad for a Messiah whose gospel is for all nations (Matthew 28:19). Practical Applications For Believers 1. Responsive Obedience: Joseph acts immediately; modern disciples likewise heed God’s Word without procrastination. 2. Trust in Providence: God preserves His purposes despite political upheaval, encouraging believers facing uncertain regimes today. 3. Sanctuary and Mission: Egypt serves as refuge; Israel as mission field. God may lead His people into temporary concealment only to release them for greater service. Eschatological Foreshadowing Jesus’ safe return anticipates His future return in glory (Acts 1:11). The pattern—departure, hidden interval, triumphant re-entry—foreshadows the parousia and assures believers that present exile will culminate in resurrection life in the renewed earth (Revelation 21:1-4). Summary The return to Israel in Matthew 2:20 is historically precise, prophetically loaded, theologically rich, christologically essential, and pastorally instructive. It ties Jesus to the covenant land, fulfills Hosea’s exodus prophecy, mirrors Moses, validates Gospel chronology, and models faith-filled obedience—all under God’s sovereign hand, pointing ultimately to the triumphant return of the risen Christ. |
    |