Why did Hoshea become king in 2 Kings 17:1 despite Israel's ongoing disobedience to God? Historical Setting In the twelfth year of Ahaz king of Judah—around 732 BC on the Ussher chronology—“Hoshea son of Elah became king over Israel in Samaria, and he reigned nine years” (2 Kings 17:1). The northern kingdom of Israel had endured two centuries of idolatry, syncretism, and political upheaval. Six kings had sat on the throne in the three decades preceding Hoshea; four were assassinated. Assyria, under Tiglath-Pileser III and later Shalmaneser V, had reduced Israel to a vassal state (2 Kings 15:29; 17:3). Internally, the people “feared other gods and walked in the customs of the nations” (2 Kings 17:33). Divine Sovereignty Over Thrones Psalm 75:7 declares, “God is the Judge: He brings down one and exalts another.” Scripture consistently places Yahweh’s kingship above earthly politics (Daniel 2:21; Proverbs 21:1). Hoshea’s coronation—even amid rebellion—demonstrates the Lord’s sovereign prerogative to install rulers who will serve His redemptive and judicial aims. The same principle had earlier allowed Pharaoh to reign (Exodus 9:16) and later enabled Cyrus to issue the decree of return (Isaiah 45:1-4). Political Intrigue and Human Agency According to 2 Kings 15:30, Hoshea assassinated Pekah and “reigned in his place … during the days of Tiglath-Pileser king of Assyria.” Assyrian records (the Nimrud Tablet K.3751) corroborate a pro-Assyrian faction in Samaria that installed Hoshea after Pekah’s anti-Assyrian coalition collapsed. Thus, from a human vantage, Hoshea rose through intrigue, Assyrian approval, and elite support. God often employs secondary causes—war, diplomacy, even treachery—without endorsing the sin itself (Habakkuk 1:6-11; Acts 2:23). Theological Purposes Behind Hoshea’s Rule 1. Instrument of Final Judgment God had long warned that persistent covenant violation would culminate in exile (Deuteronomy 28:36-64). Hoshea’s brief reign positioned Israel for the 722 BC fall of Samaria, completing that judgment (2 Kings 17:6, 18-23). 2. Merciful Space for Repentance Though “he did evil in the sight of the LORD, yet not like the kings of Israel before him” (17:2), Hoshea removed the Assyrian-imposed altar of Pekah and paid initial tribute (17:3). His comparatively lighter idolatry offered one final nine-year window for national repentance (cf. 2 Peter 3:9). 3. Fulfillment of Prophecy Hosea had foretold, “They set up kings, but not by Me” (Hosea 8:4). Amos warned, “The end is upon My people Israel” (Amos 8:2). Hoshea’s ascension—outside the Davidic line, under foreign pressure—matched these oracles, underscoring Scripture’s cohesion. Covenant Faithfulness and the Remnant Principle While the kingdom crumbled, God’s unconditional promises to Abraham, Moses, and David remained intact. A righteous remnant persisted (1 Kings 19:18), eventually preserved through Judah and culminating in Messiah (Isaiah 11:1). Hoshea’s era contrasts corporate judgment with individual salvation—foreshadowing Christ, who rescues believers from ultimate exile (John 3:16-18). Archaeological Corroboration • The annals of Tiglath-Pileser III list “Aú-si-’(i)a of the land of Bît Ḥumri” (i.e., Hoshea of Israel) paying tribute—matching 2 Kings 17:3. • Shalmaneser V’s fragments (VAT 8384) describe the “seizing of Samaria” begun under Shalmaneser and finished by Sargon II, aligning with 17:5-6. • Ostraca and seal impressions from Samaria’s acropolis show administrative continuity into Hoshea’s years, affirming the biblical chronology. These finds confirm the historicity of Kings and bolster the manuscript reliability attested by over 60 Hebrew witnesses predating Christ (e.g., Dead Sea Scroll 4QKgs). The convergence of text and spade exemplifies the Bible’s factual trustworthiness. Lessons in Divine Patience and Justice Hoshea embodies Romans 11:22: “Behold then the kindness and severity of God.” Kindness: God permits a ruler marginally less corrupt, extending grace. Severity: Samaria falls when that grace is spurned. The episode teaches that national privilege does not nullify moral accountability (Luke 12:48). Comparison with Judah During Hoshea’s ninth year, Hezekiah began a sweeping reform in Judah (2 Kings 18:1-6). Two kingdoms, two responses: repentance delays judgment for Judah; obstinacy seals doom for Israel. The juxtaposition magnifies human responsibility amid divine sovereignty. Christological Trajectory Though Israel’s throne ends, God’s promise of an eternal King is unfazed. Isaiah, prophesying during these very years, speaks of a “Root of Jesse” who will rule the nations (Isaiah 11:10). Hoshea’s failed monarchy thus sets the stage for the true, resurrected King—Jesus Christ—whose empty tomb is validated by multiple independent eyewitness traditions and early creedal confession (1 Corinthians 15:3-7). Practical Application 1. God rules nations; believers need not fear political turmoil (Psalm 46:10). 2. Partial reform (17:2) cannot substitute for wholehearted repentance (Matthew 7:21-23). 3. Each generation receives a finite season of mercy; today is the day of salvation (2 Corinthians 6:2). Conclusion Hoshea became king because the sovereign Lord ordained a final administrator who, through a mix of human politics and divine purpose, would usher Israel to its covenant-promised exile, showcase God’s patience, affirm His prophetic word, and prepare the stage for the ultimate Redeemer. |
    |