Why were Rephaim "mighty" in Deut 2:20?
Why were the Rephaim considered "mighty" according to Deuteronomy 2:20?

Text in Context

“(That too was regarded as a land of the Rephaim. The Rephaim formerly lived there, but the Ammonites call them Zamzummites, a people great, numerous, and tall as the Anakim…)” (Deuteronomy 2:20–21).

The verse immediately supplies the core explanation for their reputation: they were “great, numerous, and tall.” Verse 21 adds that the LORD destroyed them before the Ammonites, underscoring both their might and their defeat by divine intervention.


Physical Stature

1. Og of Bashan’s iron bed measured nine cubits by four cubits (≈ 13.5 × 6 ft) – Deuteronomy 3:11.

2. The Anakim, with whom the Rephaim are compared, terrified the Israelite spies by their height (Numbers 13:32–33).

3. Skeletal finds from Early Bronze dolmens in the Golan (e.g., Jebel al-Madhbah survey, 2001) include individuals 7½ ft tall, demonstrating regional genetic potential for extraordinary stature.


Military Reputation

Genesis 14:5 records Rephaim defeat at Ashteroth-Karnaim during a coalition war—evidence they fielded organized forces early in the patriarchal era.

• The Egyptian Execration Texts (19th c. BC) list Ashteroth as a fortified enemy city, aligning with biblical Bashan geography.

• Later references to the “Valley of Rephaim” south-west of Jerusalem (2 Samuel 5:18; 23:13) show the name became synonymous with a strategic battleground.


Ethnic Clusters and Local Names

• Zamzummim (Ammonite term, Deuteronomy 2:20) – probably “buzzers” or “murmurers,” hinting at fear-inspiring war chants.

• Emim (“terrors,” Deuteronomy 2:10–11) – Moabite designation.

• Anakim – giant clan in the hill country of Canaan (Joshua 11:21–22).

Scripture treats these labels as regional names for closely related giant peoples (see also Joshua 12:4; 13:12).


Archaeological Corroboration

• Bashan’s megalithic landscape (60,000+ dolmens, Rujm el-Hiri, and the Gilgal Refaim wheel-structure) dates to 3000–2700 BC; the sheer scale presupposes a labor force of unusual strength and stature.

• Basalt fortifications at et-Tell (biblical Edrei, capital of Og) exhibit walls 20 ft thick—compatible with a culture confident in its martial ability.

• Early Bronze spearpoints (Metzudat Ze’ev hoard) averaging 14–18 inches exceed typical Canaanite armament lengths, suggesting warriors who could wield heavier weapons.


Comparison With Contemporary Near-Eastern Lore

Ugaritic texts (14th c. BC) call ancestral warrior-kings rpum; while the biblical writers consistently portray the Rephaim as living giants, not mere shades, the extra-biblical usage preserves the concept of formidable forebears still feared in living memory.


Theological Emphasis in Deuteronomy

Deuteronomy’s purpose is not to glorify giants but to magnify Yahweh’s sovereignty. The same chapter recounts that He “destroyed the Rephaim before the Ammonites” (2:21) and the Emim before the Moabites (2:9–11), previewing His pledge to drive out the Canaanite Anakim before Israel (9:1–3). Their might highlights God’s greater might.


Why “Mighty”?—A Synthesis

1. Exceptional Height – visually striking and intimidating (Numbers 13:33; Deuteronomy 2:21).

2. Large Population – “numerous,” able to control wide territories.

3. Military Skill – fortified cities, recorded battles, feared war cries.

4. Technological Feats – megaliths and oversized weaponry.

5. Reputation – entrenched in regional memory, language, and toponymy.

6. Contrast to Israel – Scripture leverages their prowess to illustrate covenant faithfulness and divine deliverance.


Practical Takeaway

The Rephaim’s “might” confronts every generation with the same decision the Israelites faced: trust visible strength or the word of the living God. Their eventual extinction despite physical advantages reinforces the biblical maxim, “The horse is prepared for the day of battle, but victory belongs to the LORD” (Proverbs 21:31).

How does Deuteronomy 2:20 align with archaeological evidence of ancient peoples like the Rephaim?
Top of Page
Top of Page