Why did prophets in 1 Samuel 9:9 use to be called seers? Passage in Focus “(Formerly in Israel, if someone went to inquire of God, he would say, ‘Come, let us go to the seer,’ for the prophet of today was formerly called a seer.)” — 1 Samuel 9:9 Historical Development of the Prophetic Office Patriarchal figures (Genesis 20:7; 2 Peter 2:5) received divine messages directly, but with Samuel came the first organized prophetic schools (1 Samuel 10:5; 19:20). Archaeological texts at Mari (c. 18th cent. BC) and Lachish ostraca (7th cent. BC) confirm that ecstatic visionaries and divine spokesmen were common in the Ancient Near East, yet Israel’s prophets were unique in proclaiming the exclusive covenantal authority of Yahweh (Deuteronomy 18:18–22). The transitional note in 1 Samuel 9:9 records this shift inside the biblical narrative itself. Functions of a Seer in Early Israel 1. Revelation of hidden matters (1 Samuel 9:19–20). 2. Guidance for civil leaders (1 Samuel 16:1–3). 3. Intercessory prayer and sacrifice (1 Samuel 7:5–9). 4. Moral and covenantal enforcement (2 Samuel 12:1–14). Visual revelation—dreams, trance, symbolic actions—was the primary medium, hence the appellation “seer.” Transition of Terminology in the Time of Samuel Samuel spans the judges-to-monarchy transition and likewise the linguistic transition of rō’eh to nābî’. By David’s reign, Gad is “David’s seer” (2 Samuel 24:11) while Nathan is “prophet” (2 Samuel 7:2). Both minister concurrently, indicating overlap rather than replacement. The narrator of 1 Samuel writes for an audience more familiar with nābî’, so he inserts the parenthetical explanation to ensure clarity. Canonical Harmony Early books (1 Samuel 9:9; 1 Chronicles 9:22) prefer rō’eh; later historical and prophetic books use ḥōzeh (“seer/visionary,” e.g., Isaiah 30:10) and chiefly nābî’. The New Testament continues the shift: John the Baptist is “prophet” (Matthew 11:9), Agabus “prophet” (Acts 11:27), while visionary language persists in apokalypsis (“revelation”) given to John (Revelation 1:1). The progression is consistent, not contradictory. Theological Significance of Vision in Revelation Seeing signifies direct perception of God’s message; speaking signifies faithful transmission. Both culminate in Christ, who both sees the Father (John 6:46) and speaks the Father’s words (John 12:49). Hebrews 1:1-2 underscores the progression: “God, having spoken of old... has in these last days spoken to us by His Son.” The office of seer-prophet foreshadows the perfect revelator, Jesus. Practical Application and Contemporary Relevance 1 Samuel 9:9 reminds readers that God’s revelation is progressive yet unified. Christians today honor both the inspired sight (illumination by the Holy Spirit, Ephesians 1:18) and the inspired word (2 Timothy 3:16). Modern believers no longer seek a “seer” to find lost donkeys, but they still rely on God-given Scripture to navigate life and to encounter the Risen Christ, the supreme Prophet who both sees and speaks perfectly. |
    |