What is the Bible's stance on faith-based violence? 1. Introduction to the Concept of Faith-Based Violence Faith-based violence refers to acts of aggression or harm carried out in the name of religious conviction. The biblical record spans many centuries and different cultural contexts, and it addresses violence both descriptively (reporting what happened) and prescriptively (stating commandments or moral guidance). Understanding the Bible’s stance requires examining how these passages interconnect and recognizing consistent themes—from the earliest books through the life and teachings of Jesus and the Apostles. 2. Old Testament Context 2.1. The Nature of God’s Justice Scripture depicts God as a righteous judge, emphasizing that He alone has the wisdom and authority to determine moral consequences. When the Old Testament describes “holy war,” such as the conquest of Canaan (Joshua 6–12), it occurs under unique circumstances commanded by God (cf. Deuteronomy 7:1–2). These commands served both as an act of divine judgment against nations practicing egregious sins (Deuteronomy 9:4–5) and as a means of preserving Israel from adopting pagan practices. However, these events were part of a specific historical-theocratic context. They are not generalized instructions for perpetual violence against all nonbelievers. Each such action in the Old Testament is presented as a direct and solemn command from God, often accompanied by warnings that Israel itself would face the same judgment if it turned to idolatry (cf. Deuteronomy 8:19–20). 2.2. Restriction of Personal Vengeance While the Old Testament acknowledges war under divine mandate, it simultaneously forbids personal acts of violence or revenge. For example, Leviticus 19:18 instructs, “Do not seek revenge or bear a grudge against any of your people, but love your neighbor as yourself.” Even the well-known “eye for an eye” principle (Exodus 21:24–25) is, in context, a legal guideline for proportional justice rather than a license for unrestrained violence. 2.3. Historical and Archaeological Note Archaeological findings (such as evidence of city destruction layers that some link to the Israelite conquest) substantiate that battles and conquests described in Scripture took place in a real historical setting. For instance, excavations at Jericho have yielded data suggestive of ancient walls collapsing, sparking discussions about the biblical conquest narrative (Joshua 6). Although interpretations of the data vary, these findings underscore the Old Testament’s historical dimension rather than presenting those events as timeless commands for violent acts. 3. New Testament Transformations 3.1. Jesus’ Teachings on Nonviolence In the New Testament, the focus shifts to the transformative teachings of Jesus, who underscores love, mercy, and reconciliation. In the Sermon on the Mount, He proclaims: “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye and tooth for tooth.’ But I tell you not to resist an evil person. If someone slaps you on your right cheek, turn to him the other also” (Matthew 5:38–39). This teaching establishes a clear departure from seeking personal retaliation. Additionally, Jesus instructs: “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” (Matthew 5:44), illustrating a radical philosophy of love, peacemaking, and forgiveness that stands in contrast to any concept of using violence in His name. 3.2. The Example of Jesus and His Disciples In the garden of Gethsemane, when Peter drew his sword to defend Jesus, he was told, “Put your sword back in its place… for all who draw the sword will die by the sword” (Matthew 26:52). This moment emphasizes that Jesus’ mission was not advanced through forceful means. Later, the Apostles followed this example. Nowhere in the New Testament do they advocate or practice violence to further the gospel. Rather, they willingly endured persecution and martyrdom (Acts 7:58–60; 2 Corinthians 11:23–27) rather than retaliate or promote violence against opponents. 4. Apostolic Epistles and Early Church Understanding 4.1. The Spirit of Peace and Love The Epistles reinforce a nonviolent posture for believers. Romans 12:17–18 instructs, “Do not repay anyone evil for evil… If it is possible on your part, live at peace with everyone.” This directive urges believers to avoid returning harm and instead pursue peace whenever possible. In the same passage, the Apostle Paul clarifies that God alone possesses the prerogative to dispense perfect justice: “Do not avenge yourselves, beloved, but leave room for God’s wrath” (Romans 12:19). This underscores that followers of Christ should refuse to take up arms or retaliate on God’s behalf. 4.2. The Early Church Approach First-century Christian writings and extra-biblical records (like portions of the writings of early Church Fathers) reveal believers often suffered persecution but did not organize violent revolts. This approach was consistent with the teachings of Jesus and the Apostles—patience under suffering and a refusal to carry out retribution. 5. Clarifying Misunderstandings 5.1. Distinguishing Prescription from Description A careful reading must distinguish between descriptive passages (which record events as they happened in Israel’s history) and prescriptive passages (which instruct believers generally). For instance, the violent episodes recorded in historical narratives (Judges, Kings, Chronicles) detail specific moments in Israel’s journey, not universal mandates for faith-based violence. 5.2. Recognizing Covenantal Shifts With the coming of Christ, the people of God are no longer a single ethnic or national entity, but rather a global community of believers. Thus, Christians do not operate as a theocratic nation-state authorized to wage holy war. Instead, believers function under the new covenant ethic of loving enemies and praying for persecutors (Luke 6:27–28). 6. The Overarching Biblical Principle 6.1. The Command to Love From both Old and New Testaments emerges a fundamental principle of love for God and neighbor (cf. Deuteronomy 6:5; Matthew 22:37–39). This foundational love precludes the notion of willingly inflicting harm on others in the name of advancing faith. Even Old Testament directives aiming to purge evil from the land served, within their context, to uphold justice and preserve holiness—never to provide a sweeping license to enact personal violence. 6.2. Pursuit of Peace Scripture portrays the kingdom of God as one characterized by peace, justice, and spiritual transformation. Believers are called “ambassadors for Christ” (2 Corinthians 5:20), a role that involves reconciling people to God, not forcing them by coercion. Throughout the New Testament, the focus consistently remains on persuading and testifying (Acts 17:2–4) rather than compelling others by force to accept the gospel. 7. Conclusion The biblical witness, when viewed comprehensively, does not endorse faith-based violence as a standing command. While there are historical instances in the Old Testament of God’s judgment carried out through Israel, these occurred under explicit and limited directives within a theocratic context. With the advent of Christ and the teachings of the New Testament, believers are instructed to live out a new ethic grounded in love, peace, and reliance on God’s ultimate justice. This ethic does not resolve all tensions regarding moral responsibility, state governance, or self-defense in a broader sense, but when it comes to promoting faith by violence, the biblical stance is firmly against it. The New Testament highlights self-sacrificial love, peacemaking, and a trust that God alone has the right to enact true justice. As such, faith-based violence finds no support as a prescription for the Christian life according to Scripture. |
    |