What are Smartism and Advaita Vedanta? I. Overview of Smartism and Advaita Vedanta Smartism and Advaita Vedanta are interconnected strands within certain Hindu traditions. Smartism reflects a devotional practice that honors multiple deities, while Advaita Vedanta offers a philosophical system of non-duality. Both have played significant roles in shaping broader Hindu thought, yet their teachings differ from a biblical understanding of God and salvation. These traditions trace their roots to ancient texts known as the Vedas and Upanishads. While Smartism denotes a specific devotional framework, Advaita Vedanta focuses more on philosophical inquiry into the nature of ultimate reality (Brahman) and individual identity (Atman). Because of the deep historical and religious contexts of these movements, each has influenced worldwide discussions on spirituality, philosophy, and theology. Below is a comprehensive review of these systems, including their origins, doctrine, key figures, and contrasts with biblical teaching. II. Historical Background 1. Vedic Origins: Smartism and Advaita Vedanta both look to the Vedas as the foundation of truth. Over centuries, commentary on the Vedas through the Upanishads, the Brahma Sutra, and the Bhagavad Gita gave rise to various schools of thought. Traditional scholarship places the oldest Vedas between 1500–1200 BC (though dates vary considerably). 2. Development of Smartism: - Smartism emerged as a tradition centered on the idea that worshipers may choose among several major Hindu deities—commonly Vishnu, Shiva, Shakti (Devi), Surya, and Ganesha—yet these diverse forms ultimately point back to one ultimate reality. - Adi Shankaracharya (traditionally dated to the 8th century AD) is often associated with codifying and revitalizing Advaita Vedanta, and his influence also contributed to the acceptance of a more philosophical devotion under the Smartist umbrella. 3. Advaita Vedanta’s Philosophical Context: - “Advaita” means “non-dual.” This system asserts that Brahman (the absolute reality) is formless and that individual souls (Atman) are ultimately one with Brahman. - Early teachers, such as Gaudapada and Adi Shankaracharya, wrote extensive commentaries to define this perspective, defending it against other Hindu viewpoints like Dvaita (dualism) and Vishishtadvaita (qualified non-dualism). III. Core Beliefs of Smartism 1. Focus on Multiple Deities Within One Reality: Smartism followers typically practice the “Panchayatana puja,” a worship method involving five deities. The faithful are free to give primacy to one deity while accommodating all others as different manifestations of the same Divine. 2. Emphasis on Scriptural Tradition: Smartas use the Vedas and Upanishads as authoritative, along with the Puranas and the Bhagavad Gita. While the tradition allows for diverse devotion, there is often a unifying thread of philosophical reflection on the ultimate oneness of God (though expressed in differing forms). 3. Devotional Practices and Rituals: Despite the strong philosophical grounding, Smartism also includes temple worship, home rituals, and pilgrimage. Devotees often stress ethical living, reflection on sacred texts, and service to others, acknowledging a moral framework that fosters personal growth and societal well-being. IV. Core Beliefs of Advaita Vedanta 1. Non-Duality (Advaita): Advaita Vedanta proclaims that the only ultimate truth is Brahman, the unchanging reality. The apparent multiplicity in the world (including individual persons and objects) is viewed as Maya (illusion or ignorance). 2. Identity of Atman and Brahman: A hallmark verse often cited is “Tat Tvam Asi” (“That Thou Art”) from the Chandogya Upanishad, indicating that the individual self (Atman) and the ultimate reality (Brahman) are fundamentally one. 3. Liberation (Moksha) through Knowledge (Jnana): Advaita Vedanta emphasizes the pursuit of true knowledge to realize the non-distinction between Atman and Brahman. Once ignorance is removed, spiritual liberation is said to be attained. 4. Influence of Adi Shankaracharya: Shankaracharya’s commentaries on the Brahma Sutra, the principal Upanishads, and the Bhagavad Gita laid the foundation. He taught the practice of “Neti Neti” (“not this, not that”)—a method of indicating that true reality transcends all finite conceptions. V. Key Distinctions from a Biblical Perspective 1. Nature of God vs. Brahman: - Scripture repeatedly affirms a personal, knowable Creator distinct from creation: “For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—His eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen…” (Romans 1:20). - In Advaita Vedanta, Brahman is ultimately impersonal and undifferentiated, whereas the Bible describes God as intimately involved in history, revealing Himself to humanity in personal ways (Exodus 3:14; John 1:14). 2. Personhood and Relationship: - Biblical teaching emphasizes direct fellowship between God and believers: “And this is eternal life: that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom You have sent” (John 17:3). - Advaita suggests that any sense of distinct personal identity is illusory, and the ultimate goal involves dissolving individuality into oneness with Brahman. 3. Salvation vs. Moksha: - Scripture proclaims salvation by grace through faith in Christ (Ephesians 2:8–9), culminating in the resurrection hope: “But Christ has indeed been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep” (1 Corinthians 15:20). - Advaita Vedanta envisions liberation from rebirth through the experiential realization of oneness. These paths differ sharply: Christian salvation hinges on the historical death and resurrection of Jesus (Romans 10:9), while Advaita calls for internal awakening to non-duality. 4. Historical Verification: - The Bible’s claims align with historical and archaeological discoveries—such as the Dead Sea Scrolls that confirm textual consistency of the Hebrew Scriptures. - By contrast, while ancient Hindu texts contain valuable spiritual and cultural insights, they are not typically subjected to the same framework of historicity regarding timeline or verifiable miraculous events in the sense that Scripture is (e.g., the Exodus or the life of Jesus). VI. Areas of Philosophical Intersection 1. Recognition of a Transcendent Reality: Both the biblical worldview and Advaita Vedanta agree there is an ultimate reality beyond ordinary appearances—though they differ in describing its nature (personal vs. impersonal). 2. Emphasis on Ethical Living: Many Advaita Vedanta adherents promote compassion and non-violence, paralleling biblical commands to “love your neighbor as yourself” (Matthew 22:39). However, the motivations behind these ethical imperatives diverge, with Scripture grounding righteousness in the holiness of God (1 Peter 1:16). 3. Importance of Spiritual Discipline: Advaita Vedanta encourages meditation and philosophical inquiry. Christianity encourages prayer and study of Scripture for spiritual growth (Psalm 1:2; 1 Thessalonians 5:17). Both stress devotion but differ in the ultimate object and outcome of that devotion. VII. The Role of Christ in Contrasting Beliefs 1. Unique Claim of Jesus’ Divinity and Resurrection: - Scripture states: “Jesus answered, ‘I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me’” (John 14:6). - Such an exclusive claim stands apart from the inclusive approach of Smartism, which typically regards all major gods as forms of the same absolute, and from Advaita Vedanta’s non-dual teaching where personal deity merges into one impersonal reality. 2. Historical Evidence of the Resurrection: - Numerous manuscripts and early testimonies (1 Corinthians 15:3–8) attest to the early Christian claim that Jesus physically rose from the dead, which remains central to the faith. - Advaita Vedanta and Smartism do not rest their claims on a historical resurrection event. Their focus remains spiritual knowledge and devotion rather than historical interventions that point to a personal God. VIII. Implications for Worldview and Worship 1. Consequences of Non-Dual Thought: For Advaita Vedanta, the end goal of dissolving personal identity into Brahman contrasts with the Christian understanding that humanity’s destiny involves a redeemed relationship with a personal Creator (Revelation 21:3–4). 2. Devotion to Various Deities: In Smartism, honoring multiple deities is an approach foreign to Scripture’s consistent monotheism (Exodus 20:3–4). Though Smartism may unify these forms under a single ultimate reality, biblical faith insists on worship to God alone (Deuteronomy 6:13–14). 3. Existence and Nature of Miracles: The biblical narrative describes miracles—acts of God that confirm His sovereignty and personal involvement (e.g., the parting of the Red Sea, the resurrection of Christ). Smartism and Advaita Vedanta interpret miraculous phenomena in varying ways, often focusing on spiritual principles rather than historical events grounded in space-time. IX. Conclusion Smartism and Advaita Vedanta represent significant movements within Hindu thought, blending devotion, ritual practice, and philosophical insight into the nature of reality. Smartism’s emphasis on a chosen deity among many, held within a unifying absolute, coexists with Advaita Vedanta’s call to transcend multiplicity through the realization of Brahman’s oneness. From the perspective of Scripture, a distinction is made between the personal, triune God who creates, redeems, and enters into relationship with humankind and the non-dual interpretation of the divine advanced by Advaita Vedanta. The biblical focus on the historical resurrection of Christ, personal salvation, and eternal life in fellowship with the Creator shapes a worldview fundamentally different from either the devotional pluralism of Smartism or the monistic teaching of Advaita. Nonetheless, by studying such traditions, one can better understand differing religious philosophies, explore how humanity historically seeks the divine, and appreciate the unique claims of Scripture about the God who reveals Himself, redeems through Christ, and calls every person to relationship and worship. |
    |