Why does Lam 3:38 say God sends good/bad?
Why does Lamentations 3:38 suggest both good and bad come from God, seemingly conflicting with the notion of a benevolent deity found elsewhere in the Bible?

I. Historical and Literary Context

Lamentations was composed in the wake of Jerusalem’s destruction by the Babylonians (circa 586 BC). The book is a collection of laments and prayers set against the backdrop of immense suffering. In the Dead Sea Scrolls, segments of Lamentations have been preserved, confirming the antiquity and consistency of the text. Their alignment with later manuscript traditions underscores the reliability of the passage in question.

The poetic form of Lamentations 3 is highly structured, using an acrostic pattern in Hebrew. This section focuses on grief and hope, emphasizing God’s sovereignty in all events. The context is a people wrestling with the consequences of sin, national collapse, and the tension between divine justice and mercy.

II. The Specific Verse: Lamentations 3:38

“Do not both adversity and good come from the mouth of the Most High?” (Lamentations 3:38)

This short question in verse 38 can be perplexing: it appears to suggest that both positive blessings and calamities originate with God. From a cursory glance, this might seem to contradict passages stressing God’s goodness, such as 1 John 4:8, which states that God is love. Yet, Scripture repeatedly affirms God’s sovereignty, meaning He holds ultimate authority over what transpires in creation.

III. God’s Sovereignty in Scripture

1. Comprehensive Authority

References throughout the Bible affirm that God oversees all things. As Isaiah 45:7 declares in part, “[I] create prosperity and calamity,” demonstrating that all events fall under divine governance. This does not diminish God’s benevolence but highlights His control over every aspect of existence—both the comforting and the challenging.

2. Human Accountability

Although God is sovereign, people are held responsible for their moral choices (e.g., Ezekiel 18:20). In Lamentations, the prophet Jeremiah laments how the people’s own sins resulted in the city’s downfall, indicating that human disobedience played a pivotal role in the calamities.

3. Purpose Behind Discipline

God’s allowance of hardship can serve as discipline or a means to bring repentance, as seen in Hebrews 12:6. This indicates that “adversity” can have a benevolent purpose when it corrects and restores people to a right relationship with Him.

IV. Reconciling Divine Goodness and the Existence of Suffering

1. God’s Character

Scripture attests that God is perfectly righteous (Psalm 145:17) and merciful (Deuteronomy 4:31). The “bad” or adversity mentioned in Lamentations 3:38 must be understood in light of God’s holiness and justice. He can utilize natural events or even the consequences of human actions to achieve ultimate good—be that redemption or repentance.

2. Jeremiah’s Perspective

Jeremiah is depicting God’s orchestration of both the blessings Israel experienced and the suffering they endured. This duality reveals how God’s justice operates alongside His mercy, as He uses calamity to bring about a turning point in the hearts of the people.

3. Restoration in View

Lamentations 3 continues with a message of hope: “Because of the LORD’s loving devotion we are not consumed, for His compassions never fail” (Lamentations 3:22). This underscores that while God may permit or ordain adversity as a corrective measure or to fulfill broader plans, His goal is ultimately restorative, not wantonly punitive.

V. Scriptural Consistency and Interpretive Framework

1. Harmonizing with Other Passages

The Bible, considered as a coherent whole, repeatedly shows God orchestrating events for good ends—Joseph’s narrative in Genesis 50:20 highlights that what others mean for evil, God uses for good. In the same way, Lamentations 3:38 asserts that nothing lies outside God’s dominion.

2. Textual Transmission and Reliability

The consistency of manuscripts across centuries (e.g., the Masoretic Text tradition, the Qumran fragments) upholds that Lamentations has been transmitted accurately. Archaeological evidence from ancient Israelite sites, along with the Dead Sea Scrolls, affirms a stable textual tradition. This reliability bolsters confidence that we can rightly interpret Lamentations 3:38 within the larger biblical message.

3. Interpretation in Church History

Early church theologians, reflecting on passages like Lamentations 3:38, often recognized that God, being sovereign, has the authority to permit or orchestrate circumstances while remaining fundamentally just and loving. Their conclusions align with the biblical themes of discipline, testing, and ultimate redemption.

VI. Theological and Practical Implications

1. Trust in God’s Sovereignty

Believers draw comfort knowing that misfortunes are neither random nor outside God’s power. Romans 8:28 encourages that “in all things God works for the good of those who love Him,” providing assurance that He weaves both favorable and challenging circumstances into His larger purposes.

2. Understanding Discipline

Scripture teaches that hardship can serve as divine discipline. Though painful, it refines character and leads to deeper reliance on God (Hebrews 12:7–11). Adversity, in this light, can be transformative rather than merely punitive.

3. Preserving Faith Amid Suffering

Lamentations, while describing catastrophic suffering, ultimately leads to renewed faith: “The LORD is good to those who wait for Him, to the soul who seeks Him” (Lamentations 3:25). Even in difficulty, faith is nourished by hope in God’s steadfast love and purpose.

VII. Conclusion

Lamentations 3:38 acknowledges that nothing happens outside God’s sovereign domain. While suffering and adversity can appear contradictory to a purely benevolent view of the Lord, the broader biblical narrative reveals a God who is both just and merciful, orchestrating all events toward His redemptive purposes.

This verse, therefore, does not conflict with the notion of a benevolent deity but underscores the depth of divine sovereignty: God permits and can ordain hardship as much as blessing, ultimately working all things together for the good of those who seek Him. In the context of Lamentations, this served as a sober reminder of the consequences of sin and the hope that endurance through suffering can lead to restored fellowship with Him.

Through historical manuscripts, archaeological evidence confirming Lamentations’ authenticity, and the Scriptures’ overarching theme, we see that both “good and bad” issuing from the mouth of the Most High is a testimony to God’s comprehensive rule. Rather than undermining His goodness, it highlights a purposeful plan, directing every circumstance—pleasant or painful—toward His glorious ends.

Why doesn't God prevent suffering?
Top of Page
Top of Page